Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Parenting
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-01-2018, 02:20 AM
 
137 posts, read 145,190 times
Reputation: 192

Advertisements

"The number of families with minor children who own their home has decreased by almost 3.6 million in one decade (2006-2016), while the number of families with children living in rentals has increased by 1.9 million over the same period of time"

I think this happened because of lifestyle choices:
- people are not interested in owning anymore, they rather live somewhere close to work than move to the suburbs; Cause moving to the suburbs comes at a high cost: longer commute hours, mortgage and so on.
- the increasing age of parents having their first child;
- employers still choose downtown locations;


https://www.rentcafe.com/blog/rental...-10-years-ago/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-01-2018, 03:09 AM
 
412 posts, read 275,633 times
Reputation: 386
As a former real estate agent(twice), this is part of the reason I got out of it and never intend on going back in. The standards of who can qualify for loans has become so tight, that pretty much anyone paying student loans or other debts not relating to housing cannot qualify.

Also, another factor you're forgetting is that it used to be that if people bought a house, they were not as stuck into it because in only about 5 years paying for it, the value would appreciate a lot more than the balance of their mortgage, so they could move. Now, if people decide they want out of the house and they don't have enough money to pay the difference after they come up short, their only other option is a short sale, and only if they have a proven financial hardship to show they cannot afford to pay for the house.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-01-2018, 06:55 AM
 
Location: New Yawk
9,196 posts, read 7,231,243 times
Reputation: 15315
That has definitely been our situation. When we first got married, it was the beginning of what would be a real estate bubble in our area; almost overnight, little 700 square foot bungalows that were under $100k, were suddenly going for a quarter of a million, and kept on going up. At some point we came to the realization that we couldn’t afford both a home and a family on one income, so we picked having children first and buying a home once they were in school and I went back to work.

Was it ideal to have kids while living in an apartment? No, but at the same time, by waiting we are now able to afford a much nicer home than if we had bought before we had kids.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-01-2018, 08:27 AM
 
6,459 posts, read 7,795,049 times
Reputation: 15981
It's much less about the # of people who own Vs rent and much more about the %. Have the percentages increased or decreased? And whatever the answer, there are multiple reasons why, not just because people are not interested in owning anymore...not even sure what that means.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-01-2018, 08:36 AM
 
3,155 posts, read 2,699,769 times
Reputation: 11985
We play it safe, fiscally, and I couldn't imagine having kids before owning our house. It is the absolute largest wealth-conserving decision we could have made. Even if the house value only breaks even (it doubled in "value" in the 4 years since we bought it), over 30 years of rent increases, by the time the house is paid off, our rent (for a much smaller and shabbier place) would be $10,000/month, while our last mortgage payment will be 25% of that ($2,500/month) taxes and basic maintenence costs included.

The everyday problems of kids+apartments/rentals aside, If we didn't own the house, there would be no hope of paying for any portion of our kids college, our prospects for retirement would be dim, and the thought of helping them financially in the future would be an improbable dream.

We're pretty savvy, financially. We operate with fiscal discipline, and we have business ideas in the works that may pay off well in the long-run, but--at this point--the biggest thing we've done to put our family/kids on stable financial ground is to purchase a home before having kids.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-01-2018, 12:19 PM
 
412 posts, read 275,633 times
Reputation: 386
What's also important is, NEVER get pets until you own a house. Your options of renting will be more narrow, and you'll end up having that extra burden that keeps you from finding an affordable place to rent and save for a house
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-01-2018, 12:25 PM
 
Location: Texas
13,480 posts, read 8,380,774 times
Reputation: 25948
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nathan777 View Post
What's also important is, NEVER get pets until you own a house. Your options of renting will be more narrow, and you'll end up having that extra burden that keeps you from finding an affordable place to rent and save for a house
A lot of apartments accept pets as long as you pay a deposit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-01-2018, 12:33 PM
 
6,459 posts, read 7,795,049 times
Reputation: 15981
Quote:
Originally Posted by wac_432 View Post
We play it safe, fiscally, and I couldn't imagine having kids before owning our house. It is the absolute largest wealth-conserving decision we could have made. Even if the house value only breaks even (it doubled in "value" in the 4 years since we bought it), over 30 years of rent increases, by the time the house is paid off, our rent (for a much smaller and shabbier place) would be $10,000/month, while our last mortgage payment will be 25% of that ($2,500/month) taxes and basic maintenence costs included.

The everyday problems of kids+apartments/rentals aside, If we didn't own the house, there would be no hope of paying for any portion of our kids college, our prospects for retirement would be dim, and the thought of helping them financially in the future would be an improbable dream.

We're pretty savvy, financially. We operate with fiscal discipline, and we have business ideas in the works that may pay off well in the long-run, but--at this point--the biggest thing we've done to put our family/kids on stable financial ground is to purchase a home before having kids.
Everyone listen to that.

Our condo in Boston was crazy expensive when we bought it about 6 yrs ago and it's close to doubled in value. I can rent it out now and cover the mortgage, taxes, etc. - the renters would be paying my mortgage.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-01-2018, 01:24 PM
 
Location: TX
255 posts, read 183,973 times
Reputation: 622
Quote:
Originally Posted by carmenn View Post
"The number of families with minor children who own their home has decreased by almost 3.6 million in one decade (2006-2016), while the number of families with children living in rentals has increased by 1.9 million over the same period of time"

I think this happened because of lifestyle choices:
- people are not interested in owning anymore, they rather live somewhere close to work than move to the suburbs; Cause moving to the suburbs comes at a high cost: longer commute hours, mortgage and so on.
- the increasing age of parents having their first child;
- employers still choose downtown locations;


https://www.rentcafe.com/blog/rental...-10-years-ago/
Sorry but some of your reasons as to why you THINK people rent are wrong. First, I am married with a toddler and we WISH we could AFFORD to own. We rent. Your first reason is wrong. People certaimly don't PREFER to rent. Why would you prefer renting?? Also second reason is wrong. Actually- all those reasons are wrong lol
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-01-2018, 01:28 PM
 
Location: TX
255 posts, read 183,973 times
Reputation: 622
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nathan777 View Post
What's also important is, NEVER get pets until you own a house. Your options of renting will be more narrow, and you'll end up having that extra burden that keeps you from finding an affordable place to rent and save for a house
I kinda agree with this.we have 2 cats and in the past we slightly had an issue finding an apartment to rent that accepted cats and had an affordable cat fee. But obviously we would never get rid of our cats just so we could live somewhere.

Now we are renting a house that accepts pets so its not an issue.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Parenting

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:34 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top