Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
We know that of course, LGBT don't like to be discriminated against. They're fighting to have their voices heard and understood. WHAT does that have to do with bestiality? I THINK you're trying to say that LGBT are a bunch of deviants...just like those who practice bestiality...right?
Can't say that out loud though because then we could understand exactly where he is coming from. Comments like "everything is relative" means "I don't like them. They gross me out. Therefor if that bad can be allowed why not beastiality? And vice versa. If beastiality is deviant, then so too is homosexuality. Cuz yuck."
Notice he has not replied ONCE to the repeated comments on consent here?
No he did. He said that was a childish argument and then continued posting pictures of the Queen.
I guess he thinks the Queen has a.... special... relationship with her corgis?
I've heard lots of complaints about the royal family, but bestiality is definitely a new one.
I THINK (but it's hard to tell) that he was implying no one asks the dogs for permission to own them...or something. That the dogs don't give consent? Again...hard to tell what he means.
I THINK (but it's hard to tell) that he was implying no one asks the dogs for permission to own them...or something. That the dogs don't give consent? Again...hard to tell what he means.
That's what I took it to mean. It is a weird equivalency to make.
Can't say that out loud though because then we could understand exactly where he is coming from. Comments like "everything is relative" means "I don't like them. They gross me out. Therefor if that bad can be allowed why not beastiality? And vice versa. If beastiality is deviant, then so too is homosexuality. Cuz yuck."
Notice he has not replied ONCE to the repeated comments on consent here?
The queen's pic is not enough to explain.. that she doesn't care of her dogs consent..
I THINK (but it's hard to tell) that he was implying no one asks the dogs for permission to own them...or something. That the dogs don't give consent? Again...hard to tell what he means.
Yes...
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
