Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Parenting
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: What do you think is the ideal number of kids to have?
0 11 16.42%
1 2 2.99%
2 24 35.82%
3 14 20.90%
4 7 10.45%
5 2 2.99%
6 3 4.48%
7 1 1.49%
8 0 0%
9 0 0%
10+ 3 4.48%
Voters: 67. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-07-2008, 07:34 AM
 
Location: Western Hoosierland
17,998 posts, read 9,063,792 times
Reputation: 5943

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by skbs View Post
My grandfather was one of 13... My great grandmother was pregnant for 16 years straight... I couldn't do it... I cannot imagine 20!

Personally, I only have two because of a genetic disease my kids have a 25% chance of getting... it would mean they would be very sick and only live to about 30.... I am VERY LUCKY I have two HEALTHY kids and I didn't know about this gene until I has prego with my second... we decided it would be best to stop at two...no sense risking it. (I started out wanting four)

my grandfather is one of 14 and my grandmother is one of 10.


lucky for me i am 1 of 1.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-08-2008, 01:34 PM
 
72 posts, read 226,953 times
Reputation: 41
I noticed that in my family, the older generation had more kids, 8 is the amount my grandmother had, and 11 was the amount of kids my great-grandmother had, my mom was born in 1967 so she was 1 of 8 kids that was during the baby boom generation, and I was one of 2 kids, and so were my other cousins, a lot of them only had one sibling or were only children. And now a lot of them are getting married and having 3 or 4 kids now. Interesting, huh? I noticed that with some of my friends too. And now I'm pregnant and me and my husband plan on having 3 or 4 kids too. It seems like the younger generation of kids and Americans want bigger families now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-08-2008, 02:17 PM
 
1,219 posts, read 4,219,017 times
Reputation: 591
My dh and I each only had one sibling, too. We have 5 kids and LOVE it!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2008, 01:58 AM
 
Location: Duluth, Minnesota, USA
7,639 posts, read 18,127,435 times
Reputation: 6913
However many God chooses to give you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2008, 02:29 PM
 
72 posts, read 226,953 times
Reputation: 41
Quote:
Originally Posted by tvdxer View Post
However many God chooses to give you.
That's a good answer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2008, 02:46 PM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
475 posts, read 1,305,136 times
Reputation: 348
How every many you can afford to take care of.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2008, 03:01 PM
 
Location: SW Missouri
15,852 posts, read 35,139,020 times
Reputation: 22695
Well, for me the answer is a big, fat Zero.

Everyone has to make their own decisions, but it is a generally accepted fact that over-population is killing the planet. I don't care if the white-middle-class population is declining in leaps and bounds, the third-world is more than making up for it and the resources of this planet can only take so much.

That having been said, I personally think that having one child is the best compromise. It allows the population to grow at a slower rate, allows people to realize their "parenting" needs/desires (whatever that is), and also provides the greatest advantage to the child who does not have to share resources with others allowing them the best opportunity to learn and grow as individuals.

Personally, I see no advantage in having a passel of children, but obviously everybody's interpretation of this will be different. I cannot say that there is any right or wrong, but I do think that people should look beyond their own selfish wants when considering how big their family should be.

20yrsinBranson
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2008, 03:05 PM
 
1,875 posts, read 2,870,409 times
Reputation: 145
More power to ya.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 20yrsinBranson View Post
Well, for me the answer is a big, fat Zero.

Everyone has to make their own decisions, but it is a generally accepted fact that over-population is killing the planet. I don't care if the white-middle-class population is declining in leaps and bounds, the third-world is more than making up for it and the resources of this planet can only take so much.

That having been said, I personally think that having one child is the best compromise. It allows the population to grow at a slower rate, allows people to realize their "parenting" needs/desires (whatever that is), and also provides the greatest advantage to the child who does not have to share resources with others allowing them the best opportunity to learn and grow as individuals.

Personally, I see no advantage in having a passel of children, but obviously everybody's interpretation of this will be different. I cannot say that there is any right or wrong, but I do think that people should look beyond their own selfish wants when considering how big their family should be.

20yrsinBranson
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2008, 03:09 PM
 
Location: SW Missouri
15,852 posts, read 35,139,020 times
Reputation: 22695
Quote:
Originally Posted by gdude View Post
my grandfather is one of 14 and my grandmother is one of 10.


lucky for me i am 1 of 1.
Me too! Rock on. No having to deal with other people's DRAMA that affect my life in a negative way. No arguing with brothers and sisters about who gets the inheritance (if any).

Besides it has been proven (scientifically, statistically, anecdotally) that only children are more intelligent, more mature and better adjusted than children from multiple-child families. *And* we generally know how to entertain ourselves and enjoy being alone!

Ya can't beat it.

20yrsinBranson
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2008, 04:16 PM
 
Location: Manitoba
793 posts, read 2,214,107 times
Reputation: 277
For me it be at least 5. We both love children greatly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Parenting

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:01 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top