Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Pennsylvania
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-04-2013, 07:24 AM
 
Location: Philly
10,227 posts, read 16,811,894 times
Reputation: 2973

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by PacoMartin View Post
The term "urban area" in census geography uses a very strict definition of the end of an urban area. It completely ignores any municipal or state boundaries. The boundaries are chaotic shapes.

The numbers for "Metropolitan Census Area" and "Combined Census Area" outside of New England respects county lines. Theses populations are easier to estimate, although invariably counties are included that some people find unusual. For instance including Trenton with New York City CMSA instead of Philadelphia.
in this case, allentown to phillipsburg is a contiguous urban area where as lancaster, york, and harrisburg are not.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-04-2013, 09:39 AM
 
Location: Pittsburgh, PA (Morningside)
14,352 posts, read 17,012,289 times
Reputation: 12401
Quote:
Originally Posted by pman View Post
in this case, allentown to phillipsburg is a contiguous urban area where as lancaster, york, and harrisburg are not.
The Lancaster urbanized area already includes a few parts of York County (such as Wrightsville). It looks as if they're less than a mile from merging, and probably will by 2020 provided the last stretch of undeveloped farm along Lincoln Highway gets developed.

Looking at Harrisburg and York it appears the two already touch somewhere south of York Haven. So presumably their merger will happen even sooner.

Hell, it appears that Reading has almost merged with Lancaster as well. That said, there are examples of adjacent urbanized areas which have not been merged. For example, Pottstown and Trenton are not part of the Philadelphia urbanized area. So it may be some time before they are formally merged.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2013, 02:40 PM
 
32 posts, read 45,411 times
Reputation: 22
Quote:
Originally Posted by SteelCityRising View Post
Philadephia, for example, while being our own "first city" in PA is still overshadowed quite a bit on the national radar due to its unfortunate close proximity to NYC. On a smaller scale Pittsburgh is pretty much sitting pretty all by itself with nothing "urban" for hours around it, which means it should always be the "second city" in the state but will always be viewed as more of a "sibling" to Philadelphia on the national level when people think of PA. Americans have a pretty limited knowledge of geography. I'd hazard a guess to say many think Philadelphia is the state capital---not Harrisburg. I'd also guess that many Pennsylvanians don't realize Pittsburgh only has just over 300,000 people.
Most Americans don't realize that Pittsburgh is nearly five hours away from Philadelphia. One city may as well be in Indiana and one in New York, for as far apart and as unrelated as they are.

Frankly, I'd be hard pressed to name a single town in the entire state that I see as "booming" in the foreseeable future. Unless you define "booming" as only loosing population and jobs below some annual percentage level.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2013, 02:54 PM
 
Location: Philadelphia, PA
1,567 posts, read 3,115,318 times
Reputation: 1664
Quote:
Originally Posted by bannedintheusa1 View Post
why? I'm guessing there's a reason they are considered separate. I'm not sure that Paco was saying they need to be one but that you need to understand the differences rather than arbitrarily saying things. in other words, perspective. people in Lancaster commute to Harrisburg, they also commute to Philadelphia. I think there should be a reason. the census uses commute patterns afaik. nearly a third of Lancaster's metro jobs are in Lancaster city so in the end it's a tight little cluster. I'd point out that a unified region would actually give you less information. admittedly I'm a little confused as to why philly and Pittsburgh are lower than you usually see them.

Lancaster is usually quoted at over a half million and philly near 6 million (Pittsburgh over 2)
Lancaster County, Pennsylvania - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Just as background, I grew up in Lebanon so I'm from that general area. Even back in the 70s and 80s the broadcast media was billed as "South Central PA" or "Susquehanna Valley". So even then there was a recognition of a proto unity of sorts. The countryside of all the cities is (unfortunately) building out towards each other. More and more, it's one region that contains its historical node cities.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2013, 03:14 PM
 
16 posts, read 19,397 times
Reputation: 18
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJ Johnson View Post
Most Americans don't realize that Pittsburgh is nearly five hours away from Philadelphia. One city may as well be in Indiana and one in New York, for as far apart and as unrelated as they are.

Frankly, I'd be hard pressed to name a single town in the entire state that I see as "booming" in the foreseeable future. Unless you define "booming" as only loosing population and jobs below some annual percentage level.
how do you explain that the Lehigh valley, sepa, south central pa, and Pittsburgh have all been growing? perhaps not boomtown (though Allentown's numbers are pretty strong) but not "losing below average"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2013, 02:51 PM
 
Location: Kittanning
4,692 posts, read 9,031,392 times
Reputation: 3668
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJ Johnson View Post
Most Americans don't realize that Pittsburgh is nearly five hours away from Philadelphia. One city may as well be in Indiana and one in New York, for as far apart and as unrelated as they are.

Frankly, I'd be hard pressed to name a single town in the entire state that I see as "booming" in the foreseeable future. Unless you define "booming" as only loosing population and jobs below some annual percentage level.
Five hours is not far from one end of a state to another, unless you're in Delaware.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-29-2013, 03:10 PM
 
124 posts, read 153,636 times
Reputation: 34
I think Pat Howard made a kind of case back in 2011 in Erie:

Pat Howard: Only changing the rules can save Erie, other Pa. cities Source: GoErie
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Pennsylvania

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top