Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Pennsylvania
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-27-2017, 07:25 AM
 
Location: Morrison, CO
34,231 posts, read 18,575,619 times
Reputation: 25802

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by DoneWithPA View Post
They Leave here because of the High Taxes, Bad roads that We have Paid to Fix for years, A haven for Illegal Aliens, Highest Gas tax in the nation and Now Wolf wants another tax increase for What oh yea the Teachers Union. Im on my way out of this State and taking my money with me and I pulled my ecom business a long time ago. Why would I want to pay business and sales tax to PA ? Screw Wolf and the welfare dead beats

There is a lot of truth to this. I worked for the state economic development dept. many years ago, and all these factors weighed in to dissuade companies from locating manufacturing here. The other problem is PA is perceived as a UNION state from the steel, and coal days. Today, the public sector unions are actually more of a problem, but that is the perception companies have. They are more likely to locate in the south, in right to work states with lower taxes, no unions, lower labor costs, and lower energy costs. Tennessee, South Carolina, Kentucky, etc. Companies will go where their costs of doing business are lower.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-27-2017, 08:50 AM
 
Location: Boston Metrowest (via the Philly area)
7,270 posts, read 10,596,784 times
Reputation: 8823
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilot1 View Post
There is a lot of truth to this. I worked for the state economic development dept. many years ago, and all these factors weighed in to dissuade companies from locating manufacturing here. The other problem is PA is perceived as a UNION state from the steel, and coal days. Today, the public sector unions are actually more of a problem, but that is the perception companies have. They are more likely to locate in the south, in right to work states with lower taxes, no unions, lower labor costs, and lower energy costs. Tennessee, South Carolina, Kentucky, etc. Companies will go where their costs of doing business are lower.
Right-to-work states also have higher poverty rates, lower median incomes, and not-so-great healthcare. There's a cost of doing business that all businesses need to recognize to sustain a high standard-of-living and quality-of-life for workers, and states should not want to do business with companies that can't comply with a basic level of needs.

Last edited by Duderino; 07-27-2017 at 08:58 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-27-2017, 10:54 AM
 
2,957 posts, read 5,903,707 times
Reputation: 2286
Quote:
Originally Posted by jtab4994 View Post
LOL every silver lining has a cloud, doesn't it? 3,000 jobs instead of 50,000 makes it a disaster. Unbelievable.
Yes, because the headline that everybody talked about (and is the thread title is 50,000).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-27-2017, 10:56 AM
 
Location: Morrison, CO
34,231 posts, read 18,575,619 times
Reputation: 25802
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duderino View Post
Right-to-work states also have higher poverty rates, lower median incomes, and not-so-great healthcare. There's a cost of doing business that all businesses need to recognize to sustain a high standard-of-living and quality-of-life for workers, and states should not want to do business with companies that can't comply with a basic level of needs.

Where have all the major auto companies put assembly plants in the last twenty or so years?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-27-2017, 11:02 AM
 
Location: Boston Metrowest (via the Philly area)
7,270 posts, read 10,596,784 times
Reputation: 8823
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilot1 View Post
Where have all the major auto companies put assembly plants in the last twenty or so years?
I'm not disagreeing with the fact that the trend for manufacturing has been to head South. That's honestly been a trend since at least the 1930s when textiles starting leaving cities in New England.

My point is that when states are competing against one other to make themselves the most "business friendly," taxpayers and workers lose. There's a reason why the middle-class has declined in this country, while the top 5% of the US has been making money hand-over-fist. It's directly related to the decline in power of the American worker.

Not to mention, the South is not the bargain it once was. With more growth and population, there are needs for increased infrastructure and public services. In due time, those "cheaper" states will become just as expensive as their Northern counterparts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-27-2017, 11:53 AM
 
Location: Shawnee-on-Delaware, PA
8,077 posts, read 7,436,873 times
Reputation: 16330
Quote:
Originally Posted by blazerj View Post
Yes, because the headline that everybody talked about (and is the thread title is 50,000).
People should not be so gullible as to believe headlines and thread titles.


Anyway the OP's link is broken so we can't even go to the original article to see if he interpreted it correctly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-27-2017, 05:41 PM
 
2,957 posts, read 5,903,707 times
Reputation: 2286
Quote:
Originally Posted by jtab4994 View Post
People should not be so gullible as to believe headlines and thread titles.


Anyway the OP's link is broken so we can't even go to the original article to see if he interpreted it correctly.
Not gullible, but when you read many articles a day, comment on many forums, talk to many people, it's difficult to circle back and get the actual, correct content from a story.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-27-2017, 08:39 PM
 
Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
7,736 posts, read 5,516,649 times
Reputation: 5978
The timeline goes like this:

In 2013, the ceo of foxconn said he would build a factory in PA. Corbett's admin. touted this as a big win: Foxconn to build plant in Pennsylvania - Nov. 22, 2013

It never happened. Fast forward to early this year, and they are finally close to a decision. A decision to build a factory 17x smaller and pennsylvania is just "a potential" landing spot. Now, zero jobs are coming here out of it, which is a shame.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-28-2017, 06:53 AM
 
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
6,327 posts, read 9,153,428 times
Reputation: 4053
Quote:
Originally Posted by thedirtypirate View Post
The timeline goes like this:

In 2013, the ceo of foxconn said he would build a factory in PA. Corbett's admin. touted this as a big win: Foxconn to build plant in Pennsylvania - Nov. 22, 2013

It never happened. Fast forward to early this year, and they are finally close to a decision. A decision to build a factory 17x smaller and pennsylvania is just "a potential" landing spot. Now, zero jobs are coming here out of it, which is a shame.
It sounds like this factory is many years from being operational. I heard they haven't even bought any land in Wisconsin for this plant yet, this thing is a long time from being a reality. At least there's the Shell Cracker plant in Beaver County which is supposed to start construction soon. I also believe they have announced business plans in the US in the past only to never do anything as well.

Last edited by bradjl2009; 07-28-2017 at 07:11 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-28-2017, 06:56 AM
 
Location: Shawnee-on-Delaware, PA
8,077 posts, read 7,436,873 times
Reputation: 16330
Quote:
Originally Posted by thedirtypirate View Post
The timeline goes like this:

In 2013, the ceo of foxconn said he would build a factory in PA. Corbett's admin. touted this as a big win: Foxconn to build plant in Pennsylvania - Nov. 22, 2013

It never happened. Fast forward to early this year, and they are finally close to a decision. A decision to build a factory 17x smaller and pennsylvania is just "a potential" landing spot. Now, zero jobs are coming here out of it, which is a shame.
The Harrisburg plant from the 2013 article was projected to employ only 500 people, not 50,000. Was that even the same project?


In any case, I do agree that it's a shame PA did not get the 3,000-worker plant.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Pennsylvania
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top