Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Pennsylvania > Philadelphia
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-02-2015, 01:22 PM
 
Location: The City of Brotherly Love
1,304 posts, read 1,230,755 times
Reputation: 3524
Quote:
Originally Posted by cpomp View Post
#1 and #2 are far to ghetto to have an attractive downtown.

#3 Too many NIMBYs. People in the suburbs are even more anti-development than the city.

#4 This would be an extension of downtown, and the only logical option.

I would have said Callowhill/Northern Liberties had the chance, but NoLibs is too low density and Callowhill is at least a decade away from that.
The area around Temple is pretty ghetto, but it seems like it is becoming nicer with each passing year. If Temple got a hold of the projects near the Temple University station, tore them down, and built a mixed-use complex with a residential component, the area would be even nicer.

#2 is a shame that it is so ghetto. It is one of the best transit nexuses that Philly has to offer.

I can see Callowhill becoming more dense, especially if the project at Broad and Callowhill (I forgot its name) takes off. Spring Garden Street is another one I can see becoming more dense, especially as the Greenway project finishes up. Even North Vine is taking off with 1601 Vine, the Mormon Temple, and the meeting house all being constructed on former surface lots. It would be cool if the area between North Vine and Spring Garden became a super-dense extension of Center City.

Quote:
Originally Posted by kyb01 View Post
Actually I think he means the area that already has lots of development near City Ave and Monument Rd for #3.
Yep! That's what I had in mind (even towards Presidential Boulevard). West of Belmont Avenue could become more dense in my opinion, excluding the large shopping center. Convert the R6 to heavy rail rapid transit (or at least a full-fledged Regional Rail line) and increase the bus frequency between Bala station and everything east of it, and we have excellent transit connectivity!

Also, I will do some research in that movement. I'm interested now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-02-2015, 01:32 PM
 
Location: Philadelphia, PA
233 posts, read 333,837 times
Reputation: 189
Quote:
Originally Posted by PhilliesPhan2013 View Post
I have a few places in mind that could see high density development:

#1. TempleTown (Cecil B. Moore)-I think this neighborhood is prime for high density construction. With Temple unable to acquire more space for its campus, going vertical seems like the only logical choice. Morgan Hall was completed in 2013 and really shows us what that area is capable of.

#2. North Philadelphia (Broad and Lehigh)-This is one of the most transit friendly nodes in the city, with access to the Broad Street Line, SEPTA Regional Rail lines, Amtrak, and the multitude of buses that pass through this area. I can see TOD development occurring here

#3. City Avenue-City Avenue is perfect for high density development. The only downside is that City Avenue isn't transit-friendly. If the R6 Bala/Cynwyd Line was converted into heavy rail rapid transit, that area would explode with growth!

#4. Broad and Washington-This area of the city can support high density construction, retail, and even a light rail line down Washington Avenue.
I think Broad and Erie would be more likely to see highrise development far in the future than Broad and Lehigh. There is already a highrise-ish building there, albeit an abandoned one, it is next to Temple's medical campus, and it is currently a much busier intersection.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2015, 01:46 PM
 
Location: The City of Brotherly Love
1,304 posts, read 1,230,755 times
Reputation: 3524
Quote:
Originally Posted by thwanko View Post
I think Broad and Erie would be more likely to see highrise development far in the future than Broad and Lehigh. There is already a highrise-ish building there, albeit an abandoned one, it is next to Temple's medical campus, and it is currently a much busier intersection.
That makes sense. I hear that Erie Avenue is one of the heaviest traveled corridors for SEPTA. I was thinking Broad and Lehigh just because of how many modes of transportation exist near it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2015, 06:09 PM
 
7 posts, read 6,188 times
Reputation: 10
What about Germantown and Chelten. There is already two "highrises" and it has pretty good transit with the 23 and two regional rails nearby. A lot of the businesses there cater to lower income people but as people begin to reinvest in Germantown it could happen there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2015, 06:17 PM
 
Location: back in Philadelphia!
3,264 posts, read 5,649,418 times
Reputation: 2146
Germantown used to BE Philadelphia's second downtown, so that suggestion is not far off!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2015, 08:11 PM
 
Location: Philadelphia, PA
8,700 posts, read 14,686,635 times
Reputation: 3668
Second downtown? Sports Complex.

Rename this area "Downtown Philadelphia" and up-zone the hell out of it. With the recent success of the Navy Yard, forget about putting residential there. Put the residential here. Lay out KOZ zones on certain parcels, and let developers go to town. Here, there is easy highway access to I-76 and I-95, as well as close proximity to the airport, and the Broad Street line. Close proximity to green space too. Build some office buildings, and let the rest of the Navy Yard fill out. The rest of the demand for the area could be from residential and and hotel developments. Build a nightlife district or two as well centered around Xfinity Live! and maybe an all pedestrian retail district as well akin to Lincoln Road in Miami Beach.

Get it done city officials!

Outside of that, I don't really see any other area outside of Center City and University City that could serve as a "Downtown-esk" area in our lifetimes. I could see highrise demand along City Avenue and North Broad between Center City and Temple, but I don't see anywhere else that's so built up with enough momentum to draw in investors and developers to make such developments a reality.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-03-2015, 08:06 AM
 
10,787 posts, read 8,749,363 times
Reputation: 3983
Quote:
Originally Posted by PhilliesPhan2013 View Post
The area around Temple is pretty ghetto, but it seems like it is becoming nicer with each passing year. If Temple got a hold of the projects near the Temple University station, tore them down, and built a mixed-use complex with a residential component, the area would be even nicer.

#2 is a shame that it is so ghetto. It is one of the best transit nexuses that Philly has to offer.

I can see Callowhill becoming more dense, especially if the project at Broad and Callowhill (I forgot its name) takes off. Spring Garden Street is another one I can see becoming more dense, especially as the Greenway project finishes up. Even North Vine is taking off with 1601 Vine, the Mormon Temple, and the meeting house all being constructed on former surface lots. It would be cool if the area between North Vine and Spring Garden became a super-dense extension of Center City.



Yep! That's what I had in mind (even towards Presidential Boulevard). West of Belmont Avenue could become more dense in my opinion, excluding the large shopping center. Convert the R6 to heavy rail rapid transit (or at least a full-fledged Regional Rail line) and increase the bus frequency between Bala station and everything east of it, and we have excellent transit connectivity!

Also, I will do some research in that movement. I'm interested now.
Temple simply does not have the financial resources to "create" another downtown like Penn does. Plus the residential parts of UC were never totally neglected the way N. Philly has been. Yes, there were run down parts of UC but not pure devastation. So, I don't see anything grander happening there.

I already mentioned that the "Franklin Town" neighborhood is happening now, 40 years later, because of the Mormon projects, the Granary and expansion of Museum Towers. Further east, east of Broad, the Reading Viaduct project will change the Callowhill/Easerhead neighborhood. The are already signs of that along 13th St where a main stairway to rail park will appear.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-03-2015, 08:07 AM
 
10,787 posts, read 8,749,363 times
Reputation: 3983
Quote:
Originally Posted by rotodome View Post
Germantown used to BE Philadelphia's second downtown, so that suggestion is not far off!
It absolutely was. Definitely.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2015, 08:16 AM
 
Location: Philadelphia, PA
4,514 posts, read 4,040,229 times
Reputation: 3079
Quote:
Originally Posted by RightonWalnut View Post
Second downtown? Sports Complex.

Rename this area "Downtown Philadelphia" and up-zone the hell out of it. With the recent success of the Navy Yard, forget about putting residential there. Put the residential here. Lay out KOZ zones on certain parcels, and let developers go to town. Here, there is easy highway access to I-76 and I-95, as well as close proximity to the airport, and the Broad Street line. Close proximity to green space too. Build some office buildings, and let the rest of the Navy Yard fill out. The rest of the demand for the area could be from residential and and hotel developments. Build a nightlife district or two as well centered around Xfinity Live! and maybe an all pedestrian retail district as well akin to Lincoln Road in Miami Beach
This is where I was thinking would be the best for a second downtown. Then the area in between it and center city could get built up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2015, 08:25 AM
 
1,524 posts, read 1,181,563 times
Reputation: 3194
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeNigh View Post
Something that would add to the skyline without being continuous from the current skyline.
Are you envisioning something like what you see in Manhattan from the NJ Turnpike, where you see tall buildings way downtown and then lower buildings until you get to the Chrysler Building/Empire State Building areas of midtown? If that's the case, like another poster said, I don't see it happening.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Pennsylvania > Philadelphia
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top