Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Arizona > Phoenix area
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-19-2010, 09:40 PM
 
Location: Phoenix
3,995 posts, read 10,027,943 times
Reputation: 905

Advertisements

Massachusetts is now a "red" state that allows gay marriage! Who'd of thunk it was possible...I mocked them and told them they could no longer "chastize" Arizona for being a "red" state. Wasn't Mitt Romney from Mass (a mormon and republican )?

The funny thing is that many of my friends in Phoenix who are originally from Massachusetts are "shocked" by this development as Mass has long been considered a liberal democratic stronghold. Granted it is ONE office but it is a senatorial seat...that is big...

I reminded them that they live in a very stereotyped "red" state (Arizona) and they do just fine here; however, I can see why it is a shock to them. It would be like Sen. McCain or Kyl losing his seat to a liberal dem...

What do you all think about the development in the Massachusetts election (especially those from the Bay State who now live in Phoenix)?

In epic upset, GOP's Brown wins Mass. Senate race
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-19-2010, 10:08 PM
 
Location: Anchored in Phoenix
1,942 posts, read 4,575,429 times
Reputation: 1784
From what I read, Scott Brown, the new U.S. Senator from Massachussetts, has a record of being pro-choice. And in 1982 he posed nude for Cosmopolitan. He denies being a social liberal.

He's done more social liberal things than me, and I'm an extreme social liberal. I would have voted for the libertarian though.

I am hoping for the defeat of my congressman Harry Mitchell this fall. I have great hopes for gridlock! Stop socialism!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2010, 10:16 PM
 
Location: Phoenix
3,995 posts, read 10,027,943 times
Reputation: 905
Quote:
Originally Posted by Howard Roark View Post
From what I read, Scott Brown, the new U.S. Senator from Massachussetts, has a record of being pro-choice. And in 1982 he posed nude for Cosmopolitan. He denies being a social liberal.

He's done more social liberal things than me, and I'm an extreme social liberal. I would have voted for the libertarian though.

I am hoping for the defeat of my congressman Harry Mitchell this fall. I have great hopes for gridlock! Stop socialism!
LOL! Love the passion!

I'm not so much "anti-socialism" but that is a confusing American topic.

Otherwise to "stop socialism" we'd have to end freeways, social security, military, police, medicare, anti-trust (this is way confusing because in a perfectly capitalistic society it is almost certain a monopoly would always, eventually form), education, The Federal Reserve, and so much more!

If I was a Mass. resident I would have voted for Brown (he's CUTE!!! hmmmm...the "gay" vote?) LOL I'm being facetious...kind of : http://www.cosmopolitan.com/celebrit...-nude-in-cosmo

Last edited by fcorrales80; 01-19-2010 at 10:40 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-20-2010, 09:57 AM
 
Location: Phoenix, AZ
135 posts, read 542,830 times
Reputation: 71
I wonder, wasn't this special election in MA to fill what was left of Kennedy's term? I'm just curious about this....

When would Kennedy's term have ended? 2010 or 2012? If (hypothetically) Kennedy's term would not have ended until 2012, for instance, then in this case Brown winning the seat is a temporary thing until the MA voters can get their s--t together and decide who might be a better choice to fill Kennedy's shoes for the long term.

I doubt anyone has what Teddy Kennedy had to fill his shoes, no matter what Teddy's personal past and life was. It's going to be a tough act to follow for MA voters to replace him in years to come.

The seat has been in a democrats hands for many years even back to when I grew up there and still lived there...it might change temporarily, but I doubt it will change for the long haul...

This said...what happens to Obama's health care reform bill and the house and senate versions? We know what the media has to say about it...what think the rest of us?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-20-2010, 11:46 PM
 
Location: San Antonio
4,468 posts, read 10,628,712 times
Reputation: 4245
I don't think those voters voted on party - I think Mr. Brown hit it right on the nose - the voters voted for CHANGE. They're tired of Congress getting nothing done, and they voted for someone they thought might try to change that. The Dem candidate was just more of the same, and from what I heard from friends up there, acted like she had it in the bag. Heck, if I lived in MA, I'd have voted for him too.....and I'm a registered Democrat.

Sometimes it's about more than "party affiliation".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-22-2010, 09:08 AM
 
Location: Alexandria, VA
727 posts, read 1,535,458 times
Reputation: 754
Massachusetts screwed themselves. They should've just let the governor appoint the senator, though it doesn't help that Coakley was an awful candidate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-22-2010, 12:46 PM
 
Location: Phoenix
3,995 posts, read 10,027,943 times
Reputation: 905
Quote:
Originally Posted by jzcrandall View Post
Massachusetts screwed themselves. They should've just let the governor appoint the senator, though it doesn't help that Coakley was an awful candidate.
Exactly, I know that the voters of Mass. wanted some "change" but I don't believe they'll like the change that Brown brings. I've been reading about this political career and his standings and he is very conservative and right wing. Can there be an election to recall a senator in Mass? If so, don't be surprised if such a thing were to occur; his political leanings are not in line with liberal Mass one bit! Even Mitt Romney had more socially liberal views and he was Mormon (not that Mormons are precluded from liberal views but that is usually the case).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2010, 10:11 AM
 
Location: Phoenix, AZ
11 posts, read 14,018 times
Reputation: 14
Quote:
Originally Posted by Howard Roark View Post

I am hoping for the defeat of my congressman Harry Mitchell this fall. I have great hopes for gridlock! Stop socialism!
LOL, you're just being sarcastic on the socialism thing... right?

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2010, 11:25 AM
 
2,942 posts, read 6,525,152 times
Reputation: 1214
Quote:
LOL, you're just being sarcastic on the socialism thing... right?


While I can't speak for him, perhaps this link could help answer it:
In 2010, Conservatives Still Outnumber Moderates, Liberals
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2022 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Arizona > Phoenix area
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:36 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top