Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Pennsylvania > Pittsburgh
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-16-2011, 01:11 PM
 
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
6,327 posts, read 9,152,053 times
Reputation: 4053

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianTH View Post
Yep--right now, in retrospect "artificial" seems like the right word for the "recovery" from the Dot-Com Recession.
And we didn't even have any benefits from that "boom" which was going on from 2003 to 2006. I believe it wasn't until mid 2008 when we finally got back to our peak employment before the Dot-Com Recession. Of course though, our recovery and 2010 census results would have probably been a little different if US Airways didn't lay off thousands during the "recovery".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-16-2011, 01:22 PM
 
20,273 posts, read 33,012,123 times
Reputation: 2911
Quote:
Originally Posted by bradjl2009 View Post
And we didn't even have any benefits from that "boom" which was going on from 2003 to 2006. I believe it wasn't until mid 2008 when we finally got back to our peak employment before the Dot-Com Recession.
Of course the recent superior performance in Pittsburgh is the other side of that coin: in the mid-2000s we temporarily lost people and jobs to the metros where everyone thought they were getting rich on housing, but that bubble bursting has left many of those metros worse off than Pittsburgh.

So relatively speaking, we were better off for missing that artificial "boom". Of course the nation as a whole is much, much worse off for not having a real, sustainable recovery from the Dot-Com recession--and if there had been such a real recovery, I suspect we would have participated in it a lot more than we participated in the artificial housing-bubble boom.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2011, 02:22 PM
 
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
6,327 posts, read 9,152,053 times
Reputation: 4053
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianTH View Post
Of course the recent superior performance in Pittsburgh is the other side of that coin: in the mid-2000s we temporarily lost people and jobs to the metros where everyone thought they were getting rich on housing, but that bubble bursting has left many of those metros worse off than Pittsburgh.

So relatively speaking, we were better off for missing that artificial "boom". Of course the nation as a whole is much, much worse off for not having a real, sustainable recovery from the Dot-Com recession--and if there had been such a real recovery, I suspect we would have participated in it a lot more than we participated in the artificial housing-bubble boom.
So much for the people that have left to get rich in the past 10 years. It's likely ome of those people have actually been moving back here that left 5 to 10 years ago. I think we need a reform in how our country tries to grow the economy if it wants to prevent another recession like we just had. We should focus future growth on manufacturing, R & D, innovation, and opening small business instead of playing financial games and opening chain stores and restaurants that hire people for $10 an hour and say the economy is booming.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2011, 02:31 PM
 
20,273 posts, read 33,012,123 times
Reputation: 2911
Quote:
Originally Posted by bradjl2009 View Post
So much for the people that have left to get rich in the past 10 years. It's likely ome of those people have actually been moving back here that left 5 to 10 years ago.
I agree. We seem to have had a big spike in the labor force since the recession hit hard elsewhere and only mildly here, and I would be willing to bet a good chunk of those people were boomerang refugees.

Quote:
I think we need a reform in how our country tries to grow the economy if it wants to prevent another recession like we just had.
Yep, I would think that is obvious. Some things are easier said than done, but some economic investments have proven, sustainable value--things like education, infrastructure, R&D, and so on. If we lead in those areas, and also make sure that everyone willing and able to work can provide security and an increasingly better life for themselves and their families, we should be able to do OK.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2011, 03:24 PM
 
Location: Philly
10,227 posts, read 16,817,249 times
Reputation: 2973
Quote:
total household debt—through payment or default—fell by $1.1 trillion, or 8.6%, from mid-2008 through the first half of 2011, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Auto loan and credit-card balances in August had their biggest drop since April 2010...Deleveraging should help the U.S. economy in the long-run, putting households on a sounder footing and easing the nation's reliance on the savings of Chinese and other foreign nationals...Historically, deleveraging after a financial crisis is long and painful. In a 2010 study of 15 crises since World War II followed by deleveraging, economists Carmen and Vincent Reinhart concluded that economic growth and inflation-adjusted home prices fell in most countries during the decade after the crisis, while unemployment grew. ..From 1997 to 2007, household debt ballooned from 66% of economic output to 98%, according to Federal Reserve data. As of June, the percentage had since been whittled down to 89%...
Americans' Debt Cutting Hampers Growth - WSJ.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Pennsylvania > Pittsburgh

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:03 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top