Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Pennsylvania > Pittsburgh
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-18-2012, 09:54 AM
 
Location: Mid-Atlantic
12,529 posts, read 17,535,105 times
Reputation: 10634

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by squarian View Post
No doubt you're right, and the necessary data must be available.

How I look at it is that, if Rankin's prop values really have increased 60% since 2005, I wish I'd bought some property in Rankin.
Sure, a property costing 8000 in 2005 is now worth 12,800.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-18-2012, 11:27 AM
 
Location: Lawrenceville, Pittsburgh
2,109 posts, read 2,158,020 times
Reputation: 1845
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianTH View Post
The report does in fact get into that, and that is where it becomes clear that lower-value properties are systematically being assessed more than higher-value properties relative to recent sales. This in turn does have aggregate effects from poorer to richer school districts, or richer to poorer neighborhoods, and so on, but that is really a byproduct of this consistent underlying bias in the assessments.
Got it. So what this report/filing is saying is more like the extremes of the property value spectrum are smoothed out to look more like the median property value. To this extent, towns with an outsized number of low value properties are systematically overassessed relative to the higher average value towns as a whole. This happens at the individual property level, where the lowest of the low value properties are artifically inflated, and the highest of the high value properties are artificially deflated, possibly by some smoothing mechanism?

Edit: I'd like to point out that I'm not necessarily agreeing that this is true and accurate, but rather, I'm trying to summarize my understanding of the argument being made.

Last edited by WhoIsStanwix?; 05-18-2012 at 11:28 AM.. Reason: addendum
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-18-2012, 11:53 AM
 
20,273 posts, read 33,001,421 times
Reputation: 2911
I'd have to go back to the report (it is Exhibit 1 in the link above), but I don't think it really explained why this regressivity (as it is known) actually happened. It just showed it had happened and proposed a formulaic correction.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-18-2012, 08:57 PM
 
Location: Kittanning
4,692 posts, read 9,030,554 times
Reputation: 3668
I am constantly looking at properties in low-income neighborhoods and comparing their current sales prices to their newly assessed values. What I can tell you is that the new assessment has property value increases across the board in low-income neighborhoods, to the extent that many properties are significantly over-valued.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Pennsylvania > Pittsburgh
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:18 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top