Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Pennsylvania > Pittsburgh
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-14-2012, 06:40 PM
 
Location: Washington County, PA
4,240 posts, read 4,914,741 times
Reputation: 2859

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gnutella View Post
No, I-79, I-279, the Pennsylvania Turnpike and PA 43 are all built to Interstate standards. I-70 is not between Washington and New Stanton. I-376 is not between Robinson and Monroeville. I-579 is not except across the Veterans Bridge. PA 28 is not between I-279 and Blawnox.
That's the exact point I was making. Sorry if it was confusing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-14-2012, 08:30 PM
 
68 posts, read 124,460 times
Reputation: 21
I think Fayette County would benefit the most if the sections to I-376 are completed. The net benefit would likely be comparable to what took place in northern suburbs after I-279 was finished.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-14-2012, 10:59 PM
 
Location: South Oakland, Pittsburgh, PA
875 posts, read 1,489,164 times
Reputation: 286
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimsmith022968 View Post
I think Fayette County would benefit the most if the sections to I-376 are completed. The net benefit would likely be comparable to what took place in northern suburbs after I-279 was finished.
Even so, the benefit would only be towards NEW greenfield development, not really any sort of revitalization of the EXISTING river towns.

Case-in-point: New Kensington and Tarentum along Route 28. They both have absolutely DEAD main streets/commercial districts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-15-2012, 10:22 AM
 
783 posts, read 2,021,162 times
Reputation: 657
Quote:
Originally Posted by Impala26 View Post
Even so, the benefit would only be towards NEW greenfield development, not really any sort of revitalization of the EXISTING river towns.

Case-in-point: New Kensington and Tarentum along Route 28. They both have absolutely DEAD main streets/commercial districts.
The section that just opened was in Brownsville. You can't get much more dead than Brownsville.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-15-2012, 03:16 PM
 
Location: About 10 miles north of Pittsburgh International
2,458 posts, read 4,201,750 times
Reputation: 2374
Just curious, cause I havn't been through there in a while--with all the development that followed 279, is Mars better or worse off?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-15-2012, 04:12 PM
gg
 
Location: Pittsburgh
26,137 posts, read 25,954,579 times
Reputation: 17378
It was a total waste of money. I used to ride part of that toll road with its wildly high tolls. People downy there don't want to pay to drive like that, so they take the long way and save. No one on those roads. Too funny, but what would you expect in PA?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-15-2012, 04:53 PM
 
2,869 posts, read 5,133,664 times
Reputation: 3668
As misguided as MFE spending can be, as a person who is no longer living in Pittsburgh, I believe it would be criminal for it to try to look like Atlanta.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2012, 11:09 AM
 
Location: Umbrosa Regio
1,334 posts, read 1,806,289 times
Reputation: 970
All I will say is massive investment into large highways is backwards thinking. Transportation infrastructure that is overwhelmingly dependent on the internal combustion engine is not a good long-term strategy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-17-2012, 02:32 PM
 
1,782 posts, read 2,084,226 times
Reputation: 1366
Quote:
Originally Posted by LIRefugee View Post
All I will say is massive investment into large highways is backwards thinking. Transportation infrastructure that is overwhelmingly dependent on the internal combustion engine is not a good long-term strategy.
Yep, within 10 years the internal combustion engine will no longer be the majority driving source of power for vehicles on roads in this country. The only thing that will slow this inevitable force down is the viability of alternative fuel sources (fuel cells, solar panels, batteries, super capacitors).

ICE efficiency ~ 28% (+ transmission required)

Electric motor >95% (transmission not required)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-17-2012, 06:58 PM
 
Location: Mid-Atlantic
12,529 posts, read 17,535,105 times
Reputation: 10634
So, how will the state make highway repairs since the gas tax will be history?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Pennsylvania > Pittsburgh
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:24 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top