Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Pennsylvania > Pittsburgh
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 12-04-2012, 09:20 PM
gg gg started this thread
 
Location: Pittsburgh
26,137 posts, read 25,977,619 times
Reputation: 17378

Advertisements

Pittsburgh Public Schools consider increasing revenue from property taxes - Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Keeping in mind after 2013 there will be no windfall in place. That being said, people will see sharper increases per mil they raise. The future of all this school funding looks pretty bleak. Not just for the city though. It is for our whole region.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-05-2012, 02:20 AM
 
268 posts, read 385,459 times
Reputation: 324
This is absolutely true. Not just for our region, but for the entire state. In addition to our local reassessment issues, a huge factor is Gov. Corbett. He was largely supported in his election bid by private groups from out of state with an anti-public education agenda, and has been working with his state congress to follow through on his promises by cutting funding to public education every year since he has been in office.

Opponents of the state cuts have argued that this is going to cause a rise in local tax rates to cover some of the shortfall caused by the state cuts. This is starting to happen. However, the impact of the state cuts on local shares in upper end school districts is less because in more upscale communities they already fund nearly all (approximately 85%) of the school's operating budgets. The state cuts are really being felt in the exact districts that can afford it least. It is definitely a mess right now.

There is an easy solution that every other state in the country who has extensive gas drilling is utilizing, but that our governor is fighting against. There has been pressure over the last few years for the Marcellus gas companies to pay fees which could easily cover the tax reduction to the people of PA but Corbett is the biggest opponent to those fees...oh wait, the Marcellus drilling companies gave millions in campaign support to Corbett's election campaign and bought him off from the beginning. Now it all makes sense...

The state cuts
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-05-2012, 11:59 AM
 
Location: Lawrenceville, Pittsburgh
2,109 posts, read 2,159,791 times
Reputation: 1845
So, 11 years without an increase in school tax, which, by the way, is limited by law to 1.7%, and you're freaking out?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-05-2012, 12:14 PM
 
1,653 posts, read 1,586,085 times
Reputation: 2822
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhoIsStanwix? View Post
So, 11 years without an increase in school tax, which, by the way, is limited by law to 1.7%, and you're freaking out?
You make it sound like he needs a special occasion. Spontaneous freaking out is the best kind.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-05-2012, 02:39 PM
 
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
1,304 posts, read 3,035,416 times
Reputation: 1132
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhoIsStanwix? View Post
So, 11 years without an increase in school tax, which, by the way, is limited by law to 1.7%, and you're freaking out?
Unfortunately, that 1.7% increase will hardly put a dent in just the pension shortfall, let alone all of the fixed costs of running the school district(s) . I can see a lot of school districts trying to convince the Harrisburg bureaucrats to waive this limitation, as has been done (and granted) in the past.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-08-2012, 08:00 AM
 
Location: Washington County, PA
4,240 posts, read 4,919,051 times
Reputation: 2859
Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainlove View Post
This is absolutely true. Not just for our region, but for the entire state. In addition to our local reassessment issues, a huge factor is Gov. Corbett. He was largely supported in his election bid by private groups from out of state with an anti-public education agenda, and has been working with his state congress to follow through on his promises by cutting funding to public education every year since he has been in office.

Opponents of the state cuts have argued that this is going to cause a rise in local tax rates to cover some of the shortfall caused by the state cuts. This is starting to happen. However, the impact of the state cuts on local shares in upper end school districts is less because in more upscale communities they already fund nearly all (approximately 85%) of the school's operating budgets. The state cuts are really being felt in the exact districts that can afford it least. It is definitely a mess right now.

There is an easy solution that every other state in the country who has extensive gas drilling is utilizing, but that our governor is fighting against. There has been pressure over the last few years for the Marcellus gas companies to pay fees which could easily cover the tax reduction to the people of PA but Corbett is the biggest opponent to those fees...oh wait, the Marcellus drilling companies gave millions in campaign support to Corbett's election campaign and bought him off from the beginning. Now it all makes sense...

The state cuts
Could not have said it better myself. Crookbett is just another lying sack of crap.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Pennsylvania > Pittsburgh

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:00 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top