Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Pennsylvania > Pittsburgh
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-15-2013, 06:55 PM
 
7,112 posts, read 10,155,379 times
Reputation: 1781

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by pman View Post
actually cities like pittsburgh are usually the biggest beneficiaries. carnegie lived in nyc and hired someone to manage his factories. of course at 2.5 hours it isnt difficult to get to ny for a meeting with shareholders.
Isn't that sort of analogous to the PG's suggestion of what is happening now? The big money people head off to NYC while the basic operations remain in Pittsburgh? I don't see how Pittsburgh is benefiting. Carnegie certainly wasn't going to take the steel mills to NYC. He wanted to get away from them. Alcoa top management moved to NYC so Pittsburgh wasn't the beneficiary. This is not a positive trend. I doubt Rochester is excited that Bausch and Lomb top management went to New Jersey either.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-15-2013, 07:03 PM
 
Location: Pittsburgh
7,541 posts, read 10,287,280 times
Reputation: 3510
Quote:
Originally Posted by pman View Post
in a normal country pittsburgh would be a 2.5 -3 hr rail ride from nyc

CEO types usually don't ride trains in the 21st Century, particularly for a trip of that length. Its quicker and more private to take the company jet.




But even among the very wealthy, places like Pittsburgh can be preferred. Although Frick moved to New
York- his very wealthy daughter Helen Clay Frick came back here after his death preferring this city to live in.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-15-2013, 07:32 PM
 
1,010 posts, read 1,397,093 times
Reputation: 381
Quote:
Originally Posted by MathmanMathman View Post
Once again, they are saying it's in Whippany, N.J but really that's code for NYC. Executives with very high pay expect a certain level of city infrastructure and amenities. Pittsburgh might be falling short on that high-end stuff and therefor more suitable for middle and lower management.

The general trend is for people to move from rural to urban areas. Airline hubs are concentrating in the larger cities. Corporations want to be midst of all that growth and energy. Places like Atlanta are on the positive side of that trend while Pittsburgh is probably on the downside. Pittsburgh might have a place as 2nd tier city in all this. Some Pittsburghers want those "free-loaders" Pitt and CMU to pay their "fair share" of taxes. But really, CMU and Pitt help to keep Pittsburgh world-class.
I agree with you 100 percent.....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-15-2013, 07:45 PM
 
1,010 posts, read 1,397,093 times
Reputation: 381
Quote:
Originally Posted by MathmanMathman View Post
Wouldn't make a bit of difference. CEOs can fly in less time and in more comfort on a private jet or at least 1st class or business class on a commercial jet. Besides, they wouldn't want to invest that time and effort when it's easier to live near NYC 24/7.

Companies were in Pittsburgh because they had to be near the factories. Today, with so much better communications and jobs much more portable, what is the case for living in Pittsburgh? Want the culture, worldwide connections, and the hang with the important and famous people? You have to go to where they are.
This is why I believe have 5 or 9 fortune 500 hq does not measure the true economic growth of a region. I keep going back to Columbus, OH. A city that has 1 fortune 500 company, smaller airport and fewer flights than Pittsburgh. Yet it is growing and expanding its population. They are more than twice the size city wise and will probably pass the pittsburgh metro in size with the 2020 census.

Columbus is doing it because it does a much better job than Pittsburgh when it comes to small business startup and growth. So many people on here want to hold onto the past. Yes, heinz is and always will be an important part of this city's history. If we can hold onto the HQ that is great. However, big corporate HQ is not in Pittsburgh's future. This region needs to focus more on growing small businesses and creating a better atmosphere to start one.

This is the only hope to grow pittsburgh. We will never be the same corporate HQ as in 1950, but we can be much more stable with more economic diversity.

Pittsburgh keeps thinking New York, Chicago, LA, Philadelphia when it should be thinking Raleigh, Columbus, Portland or Salt Lake City.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-16-2013, 06:07 AM
 
Location: Philly
10,227 posts, read 16,866,270 times
Reputation: 2973
Quote:
Originally Posted by I_Like_Spam View Post
CEO types usually don't ride trains in the 21st Century, particularly for a trip of that length. Its quicker and more private to take the company jet
But even among the very wealthy, places like Pittsburgh can be preferred. Although Frick moved to New
York- his very wealthy daughter Helen Clay Frick came back here after his death preferring this city to live in.
id say that depends. thats probably true of a company like bayer where the ceos may be immigrants but its not really true as a whole that executives dont ride trains except in the us. in other countries when they build a line like , say , ny chicago , the place in the middle that gains quick access to these places, sees a large benefit. its not really debatable. why? in 2.5 to three hours youre in midtown , thats competitive with flying on a private jet.
anyway , zman , thats the impetus for my thread that mebtions lucas piatt. its important to make it as easy as possible for new small businesses to form
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-16-2013, 06:25 AM
 
Location: Philly
10,227 posts, read 16,866,270 times
Reputation: 2973
related
The Surprising Cities Leading America's Start-Up Revolution - Richard Florida - The Atlantic Cities
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-16-2013, 06:30 AM
 
5,894 posts, read 6,901,336 times
Reputation: 4107
Quote:
Originally Posted by I_Like_Spam View Post
CEO types usually don't ride trains in the 21st Century, particularly for a trip of that length. Its quicker and more private to take the company jet.
This is especially true of the CEOs in question that want to be closer to the playground for the rich (NYC), which truly is the only reason in the 21st century that one 'needs' to have executive operations there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-16-2013, 06:36 AM
 
Location: Pittsburgh
7,541 posts, read 10,287,280 times
Reputation: 3510
Quote:
Originally Posted by pman View Post
id say that depends. thats probably true of a company like bayer where the ceos may be immigrants but its not really true as a whole that executives dont ride trains except in the us. in other countries when they build a line like , say , ny chicago , the place in the middle that gains quick access to these places, sees a large benefit. its not really debatable. why? in 2.5 to three hours youre in midtown , thats competitive with flying on a private jet.
anyway , zman , thats the impetus for my thread that mebtions lucas piatt. its important to make it as easy as possible for new small businesses to form


All depends on where you are in Pittsburgh and where in New York you want to be, as to whether or not its a benefit to take a train.

Downtown Pittsburgh to Midtown New York, you're right.


Sewickley Pittsburgh to Howard Beach New York City, its much easier to take a flight.

Getting to and from the train station may or may not be easier than getting to or from the airport, depending on your final origin or destination.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-16-2013, 07:01 AM
 
Location: Mexican War Streets
1,584 posts, read 2,099,748 times
Reputation: 1389
Quote:
Originally Posted by I_Like_Spam View Post
All depends on where you are in Pittsburgh and where in New York you want to be, as to whether or not its a benefit to take a train.

Downtown Pittsburgh to Midtown New York, you're right.


Sewickley Pittsburgh to Howard Beach New York City, its much easier to take a flight.

Getting to and from the train station may or may not be easier than getting to or from the airport, depending on your final origin or destination.
Of course that's right, but entirely besides the point since the downtown to downtown travel demand is doubtlessly much greater. You could argue all airports would be downtown but for the lack of space. In a related note, it's easier to get from PIT to JFK by plane as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-16-2013, 07:22 AM
 
Location: Western PA
3,733 posts, read 5,982,290 times
Reputation: 3189
We're not likely to see a George Westinghouse or Henry Heinz again. These people built companies based on their love of invention and the product. Same with Thomas Edison. They had loyalty to their towns (and Westinghouse even built one for his workers). They had loyalty to their employees, as well. (Not so much Carnegie and Frick, but that's another story).

Today's CEOs are from the "greed is good" school. They have huge egos and massive insecurities. They're armed with their Harvard MBAs and jump on the CEO circuit from one company to the next, slashing costs, increasing margins, moving locations, and creating more wealth for their shareholders. Built in to their plans are generous golden parachutes, then it's off to their next conquest. They have no loyalty to any city - it's all about them.

This is not unique to companies in Pittsburgh. Sadly, it's pretty standard for the business world today.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2022 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Pennsylvania > Pittsburgh

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:28 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top