Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Pennsylvania > Pittsburgh
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-18-2015, 11:22 AM
 
Location: Downtown Cranberry Twp.
41,018 posts, read 18,189,699 times
Reputation: 8528

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigPizzaHutFan View Post
Paying workers fairly is corruption, but expensive infrastructure projects that make life convenient for a very few at everyone's else expense isn't corruption. What an interesting world you live in.
Again, you're leaving out the word city in front of workers. You're obviously not aware that it doesn't affect all menial jobs/workers. Big difference.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-18-2015, 11:26 AM
 
385 posts, read 309,477 times
Reputation: 187
Quote:
Originally Posted by erieguy View Post
Again, you're leaving out the word city in front of workers. You're obviously not aware that it doesn't affect all menial jobs/workers. Big difference.
I'm aware that it's only city workers. That makes your opinion even more ridiculous, because it doesn't affect you and your opinion on it means nothing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2015, 11:29 AM
 
Location: Downtown Cranberry Twp.
41,018 posts, read 18,189,699 times
Reputation: 8528
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigPizzaHutFan View Post
I'm aware that it's only city workers. That makes your opinion even more ridiculous, because it doesn't affect you and your opinion on it means nothing.
Sure it does. What's good for city workers should be good for everyone. No reason to play favorites with taxpayers $$$.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2015, 11:31 AM
 
385 posts, read 309,477 times
Reputation: 187
Quote:
Originally Posted by erieguy View Post
Sure it does. What's good for city workers should be good for everyone. No reason to play favorites with taxpayers $$$.
Exactly, which is why I'm glad PennDOT isn't going to waste my money on a very expensive HOV lane to a place where an insignificant population lives.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2015, 11:38 AM
 
Location: Downtown Cranberry Twp.
41,018 posts, read 18,189,699 times
Reputation: 8528
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigPizzaHutFan View Post
Exactly, which is why I'm glad PennDOT isn't going to waste my money on a very expensive HOV lane to a place where an insignificant population lives.
I certainly wouldn't discount it happening out to here, however.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2015, 11:40 AM
 
385 posts, read 309,477 times
Reputation: 187
Quote:
Originally Posted by erieguy View Post
I certainly wouldn't discount it happening out to here, however.
< 30,000 is not a significant population.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2015, 11:45 AM
 
Location: Downtown Cranberry Twp.
41,018 posts, read 18,189,699 times
Reputation: 8528
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigPizzaHutFan View Post
< 30,000 is not a significant population.
As with everything, time will tell. I like what they're doing out here and expect more to happen. The new construction going on is pretty significant.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2015, 12:12 PM
 
2,218 posts, read 1,944,302 times
Reputation: 1909
So the opponents of the mandatory minimum have been able to interject their miserly opinions about the issue into yet another unrelated thread. Way to go!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2015, 12:28 PM
 
Location: Downtown Cranberry Twp.
41,018 posts, read 18,189,699 times
Reputation: 8528
The topic of a huge transportation project in Cranberry was brought up. While most that comment on every Cranberry post or thread are not from here, I see no problem with it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2015, 12:30 PM
 
385 posts, read 309,477 times
Reputation: 187
Quote:
Originally Posted by erieguy View Post
The topic of a huge transportation project in Cranberry was brought up. While most that comment on every Cranberry post or thread are not from here, I see no problem with it.
Cranberry is a county away; maybe posts regarding Cranberry should be in the general Pennsylvania forum? It's a sparsely-populated, rural area that has more in common with New Castle than with Pittsburgh.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Pennsylvania > Pittsburgh

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:49 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top