Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Pennsylvania > Pittsburgh
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-27-2017, 07:34 PM
 
Location: Pittsburgh, PA (Morningside)
14,353 posts, read 17,027,384 times
Reputation: 12411

Advertisements

Read all about it here. The Trib has some more facts.

Summary across the varied sites:

1. LG Realty is abandoning the plan to build 200 apartments at this site, instead building retail and offices, along with underground parking. Groundbreaking next year, open by 2019 or 2020.

2. However, they will have to chip in money towards developing 490 units of housing within a one-mile radius of the site, with the subsidized/market rate balance split around 50/50. This will not only effectively replace all of the affordable units lost when Penn Plaza was knocked down, it will result in more market-rate units than they originally intended. I have a few guesses on where these apartments will go, but we don't know anything concrete yet. The amount of money batted around in these articles does not seem enough to build that many units, but maybe it's just the tip of the iceberg in terms of allowing for other grants and subsidies to flow.

3. The silly "Friends of Enright Park" got something out of the deal too, with LG contributing $1 million to the park's redesign. It seems the park has to be the same size or larger, but may be reconfigured a bit - which is good, because it needs to be.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-27-2017, 08:00 PM
gg
 
Location: Pittsburgh
26,137 posts, read 25,973,648 times
Reputation: 17378
deal designed to fund low-income housing

What else is new? Goodness, what happened to the middle class and people who actually contribute and work to get the prime locations. I really HATE the way Pittsburgh is going. I feel bad for the college grades with huge debt, but they make enough not to live in the subsidized stuff. Pittsburgh isn't the place to be if you are trying to work hard and move forward I guess. It is all about the poor that will just run everything into the ground like they did to East Liberty and East Hills. It is what it is.

Only a few more years and I can get out of here. I am tired of subsidizing the people that aren't contributing and never did.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2017, 08:24 PM
 
Location: Marshall-Shadeland, Pittsburgh, PA
32,616 posts, read 77,608,316 times
Reputation: 19101
Quote:
Originally Posted by gg View Post
deal designed to fund low-income housing

What else is new? Goodness, what happened to the middle class and people who actually contribute and work to get the prime locations. I really HATE the way Pittsburgh is going. I feel bad for the college grades with huge debt, but they make enough not to live in the subsidized stuff. Pittsburgh isn't the place to be if you are trying to work hard and move forward I guess. It is all about the poor that will just run everything into the ground like they did to East Liberty and East Hills. It is what it is.

Only a few more years and I can get out of here. I am tired of subsidizing the people that aren't contributing and never did.
Tyovan4 and I are the only two on here who regularly ask why there’s so much welfare thrown at the development of both luxury units and low-income-targeted units in prime walkable neighborhoods while the working-class is told “go pound sand”. If poor and rich people are being subsidized to live in nice parts of town, then I’m not going to work hard to be forced to move to a bad part of town.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2017, 08:36 PM
 
Location: Pittsburgh, PA (Morningside)
14,353 posts, read 17,027,384 times
Reputation: 12411
If you guys read the link on the Post Gazette, the plan will up the number of market-rate units developed from 200 (on the old footprint of Penn Plaza) to 239 (scattered within a mile radius). So it really isn't the case that this deal just has good things for low income people.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2017, 08:52 PM
 
11,086 posts, read 8,543,209 times
Reputation: 6392
Quote:
Originally Posted by SteelCityRising View Post
Tyovan4 and I are the only two on here who regularly ask why there’s so much welfare thrown at the development of both luxury units and low-income-targeted units in prime walkable neighborhoods while the working-class is told “go pound sand”. If poor and rich people are being subsidized to live in nice parts of town, then I’m not going to work hard to be forced to move to a bad part of town.
Renting one of those apartments would mean you pay higher rent to pay for the "low income " tenants. Nothing is free. Someone pays and it's not the owner of the apartments.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2017, 09:00 PM
 
Location: East End, Pittsburgh
969 posts, read 772,246 times
Reputation: 1044
Quote:
Originally Posted by eschaton View Post
Read all about it here. The Trib has some more facts.

Summary across the varied sites:

1. LG Realty is abandoning the plan to build 200 apartments at this site, instead building retail and offices, along with underground parking. Groundbreaking next year, open by 2019 or 2020.

2. However, they will have to chip in money towards developing 490 units of housing within a one-mile radius of the site, with the subsidized/market rate balance split around 50/50. This will not only effectively replace all of the affordable units lost when Penn Plaza was knocked down, it will result in more market-rate units than they originally intended. I have a few guesses on where these apartments will go, but we don't know anything concrete yet. The amount of money batted around in these articles does not seem enough to build that many units, but maybe it's just the tip of the iceberg in terms of allowing for other grants and subsidies to flow.

3. The silly "Friends of Enright Park" got something out of the deal too, with LG contributing $1 million to the park's redesign. It seems the park has to be the same size or larger, but may be reconfigured a bit - which is good, because it needs to be.
Do you expect these 490 apartments would be located on one site? It wasn't clear to me how this part of the deal is structured.

I'm cautiously optimistic about this deal. To me it sounds like we get the best of everything. More apartments as you mentioned, and they are a balance of market and affordable. The parking is now going to be underground and the area needs more office space.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2017, 09:07 PM
 
Location: Pittsburgh, PA (Morningside)
14,353 posts, read 17,027,384 times
Reputation: 12411
Quote:
Originally Posted by xdv8 View Post
Do you expect these 490 apartments would be located on one site? It wasn't clear to me how this part of the deal is structured.
Probably not. LG owns smaller parcels at two of the other corners of Penn and Negley (the former Babyland site and the former Monroe Muffler site). Presumably it would be easier to build apartments there because they don't need to acquire the land, but I couldn't see more than 100 units in those locations - probably less. There's other parcels further up N Negley that ELDI has been trying to redevelop that the city might have in mind ad well. Keep in mind that given the huge zone the land can be developed within, some of it could be scattered site infill in Garfield or East Liberty or something as well. It's too early to tell.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2017, 09:31 PM
 
8,090 posts, read 6,962,857 times
Reputation: 9226
Quote:
Originally Posted by SteelCityRising View Post
Tyovan4 and I are the only two on here who regularly ask why there’s so much welfare thrown at the development of both luxury units and low-income-targeted units in prime walkable neighborhoods while the working-class is told “go pound sand”. If poor and rich people are being subsidized to live in nice parts of town, then I’m not going to work hard to be forced to move to a bad part of town.
Why don’t you try being poor, since they have it so much better than the so-called “working class”. Tell us how that works out for you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2017, 10:26 PM
 
Location: Pixburgh
1,214 posts, read 1,457,555 times
Reputation: 1380
Quote:
Originally Posted by gladhands View Post
Why don’t you try being poor, since they have it so much better than the so-called “working class”. Tell us how that works out for you.
eye of the beholder. works out just fine for many people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2017, 01:41 AM
gg
 
Location: Pittsburgh
26,137 posts, read 25,973,648 times
Reputation: 17378
Quote:
Originally Posted by SteelCityRising View Post
Tyovan4 and I are the only two on here who regularly ask why there’s so much welfare thrown at the development of both luxury units and low-income-targeted units in prime walkable neighborhoods while the working-class is told “go pound sand”. If poor and rich people are being subsidized to live in nice parts of town, then I’m not going to work hard to be forced to move to a bad part of town.
Agreed. Prime land should be more for the working people, not the folks just hanging around watching a big screen TV. They can do that anywhere.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Pennsylvania > Pittsburgh
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:11 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top