Pittsburgh protests 2.0 (medical, restrictions, limit)

[erieguy]

Originally Posted by h_curtis

You have weird things that you find funny, but whatever.


Not sure what folks you're referring to, as I can only speak for myself.


I personally think everyone should have the right to do whatever they want with their bodies. I don't think the government should threaten arrest for someone choosing what they do with their body. That consistently goes for vaccines and for childbirth. I don't , nor have I ever, stated that the government should arrest anyone that doesn't get vaccinated.

Nah, hypocrisy is funny.

Great to hear, especially since you’ve been complaining about folks that aren’t vaccinated and promoted a vaccine mandate.

[h_curtis]

Originally Posted by erieguy

Nah, hypocrisy is funny.

Great to hear, especially since you’ve been complaining about folks that aren’t vaccinated and promoted a vaccine mandate.

Of course, cuz people that choose to not get vaccinated are idiots. But I don’t think they should be arrested. Just like I don’t think that people should be arrested if they choose to have an abortion.

[erieguy]

Originally Posted by h_curtis

Of course, cuz people that choose to not get vaccinated are idiots. But I don’t think they should be arrested. Just like I don’t think that people should be arrested if they choose to have an abortion.

Right. You want the government to tell folks what they can do with their bodies unless it’s something you don’t agree with. It’s called hypocrisy.

[Duderino]

Originally Posted by erieguy

Right. You want the government to tell folks what they can do with their bodies unless it’s something you don’t agree with. Pure hypocrisy.

And you want the government to be "hands off," unless it has to do with a personal health decision? Isn't that how the GOP logic goes? Or how about those pro-life politicians that secretly seek abortions for their mistresses (cough cough)

If there's anyone throwing around the "hypocrisy" darts, it certainly includes Republicans.

[h_curtis]

Originally Posted by erieguy

Right. You want the government to tell folks what they can do with their bodies unless it’s something you don’t agree with. It’s called hypocrisy.

did you not read what I wrote?


Try again, this time s-l-o-w-l-y.


I do not think someone should be arrested for choosing to not get vaccinated.
I do not think that people should be arrested if they choose to have an abortion.




Do I think people that choose to not get vaccinated are idiots? YES.


However;


I do not think someone should be arrested for choosing to not get vaccinated.
I do not think that people should be arrested if they choose to have an abortion.

Clear on that now?

[erieguy]

Originally Posted by Duderino

And you want the government to be "hands off," unless it has to do with a personal health decision? Isn't that how the GOP logic goes?

If there's anyone throwing around the "hypocrisy" darts, it certainly includes Republicans.

Love the deflection and strawman arguments. The fact is you’re picking and choosing what you think the government should do in regards to what folks can do with their bodies. Also, fact is you’ll still have a choice in regards to abortion, and another fact is it’s going to happen.

[erieguy]

Originally Posted by h_curtis

did you not read what I wrote?


Try again, this time s-l-o-w-l-y.


I do not think someone should be arrested for choosing to not get vaccinated.
I do not think that people should be arrested if they choose to have an abortion.




Do I think people that choose to not get vaccinated are idiots? YES.


However;


I do not think someone should be arrested for choosing to not get vaccinated.
I do not think that people should be arrested if they choose to have an abortion.

Clear on that now?

I read it. You’re now bringing being arrested into it because your hypocrisy has been proven. Great that you think that though. Will you be protesting against it?

Opinions vary. Not everyone lives in fear and is interested in getting an experimental shot, but always love the name calling.

[h_curtis]

Originally Posted by erieguy

I read it. You’re now bringing being arrested into it because your hypocrisy has been proven. Great that you think that though. Will you be protesting against it?

Opinions vary. Not everyone lives in fear and is interested in getting an experimental shot, but always love the name calling.

How are my two statements hypocritical? I’m saying exactly the same thing.

And of course arrest is part of it. That’s what roe v wade is all about. Like, do you even have a functioning brain? You really can’t comprehend that? Jesus.

[erieguy]

Originally Posted by h_curtis

How are my two statements hypocritical? I’m saying exactly the same thing.

And of course arrest is part of it. That’s what roe v wade is all about. Like, do you even have a functioning brain? You really can’t comprehend that? Jesus.

Because you’re picking and choosing what folks should be able to do with their bodies. You want a vaccine mandate but not an abortion law.

Lol. You didn’t bring up arrest until your hypocrisy was proven, and as I said, great that you feel that way. Will you be protesting?

[h_curtis]

Originally Posted by erieguy

Because you’re picking and choosing what folks should be able to do with their bodies. You want a vaccine mandate but not an abortion law.

Lol. You didn’t bring up arrest until your hypocrisy was proven, and as I said, great that you feel that way. Will you be protesting?

No, I'm not.


I don't know what your definition of "mandate" is when you mention it, but I'll be as clear as I possibly can.


I DO NOT WANT THE GOVERNMENT TO BE ALLOWED TO ARREST SOMEONE FOR CHOOSING TO NOT GET A VACCINATION.



I DO NOT WANT THE GOVERNMENT TO BE ALLOWED TO ARREST SOMEONE FOR CHOOSING TO GET AN ABORTION.


You understand that just because I think someone *should* get vaccinated, doesn't mean I think the government should force it under threat of arrest.



There's no hypocrisy.


We have no idea where you stand of course, because you're afraid to put your opinions out there. Why is that?


Do you think that the government should be allowed to arrest someone for choosing to get or not get a medical procedure?


My answer to that question is NO.


What's your answer to that question?