Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Pennsylvania > Pittsburgh
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-27-2008, 08:44 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,694,120 times
Reputation: 35920

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by creepsinc View Post
I read your posts several times. I repeat: staggering ignorance. On this subject at least.
What is your background on this issue?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-27-2008, 08:46 PM
 
2,751 posts, read 5,361,986 times
Reputation: 1779
Quote:
Originally Posted by creepsinc View Post
My vast library of drug literature was stolen from my car along with most of my other books during a cross-country move. The basic paraphrase of the statistics is something like 10% of people who experiment with ANY given drug, "hard" or "soft", develop a problem with it. Don't believe the government DARE hype. There's a HUGE difference between use and abuse of anything.
You had a vast library of drug literature that you made a point of dragging across the country and that's the extent of your statistics?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2008, 08:47 PM
 
Location: RVA
2,420 posts, read 4,710,930 times
Reputation: 1212
I would like to add that putting ANYTHING into one's own body is a basic individual right. Murder and rape are not. I used the word "pacified" to neutralize the argument that "drugs cause violence". If you're worried about behavior control, you should worry more about the government controlling my (and your) behavior.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2008, 08:49 PM
 
Location: RVA
2,420 posts, read 4,710,930 times
Reputation: 1212
Quote:
Originally Posted by ExPit View Post
You had a vast library of drug literature that you made a point of dragging across the country and that's the extent of your statistics?
By "drug literature", I mean just about every book written on the subject in the past 40 years. Should I be consulting FDA statistics, or perhaps the DEA? Or should I stick with controlled studies conducted by respected scientists who actually know what they're talking about. Forgive me for wanting to take my book collection with me when I moved across the country.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2008, 08:50 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,694,120 times
Reputation: 35920
You're getting carried away with my example. I frankly stand by what I said. I was not equating drug use with rape and murder. I was questioning the logic. "If people are going to do (fill in the blank) anyway, why not legalize it?" Regardless of what "it" is. That is simply not logical, because it can be applied to anything.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2008, 08:51 PM
 
Location: RVA
2,420 posts, read 4,710,930 times
Reputation: 1212
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katiana View Post
What is your background on this issue?
Years spent studying the problem from all angles and personal experience. What's yours?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2008, 08:52 PM
 
Location: RVA
2,420 posts, read 4,710,930 times
Reputation: 1212
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katiana View Post
You're getting carried away with my example. I frankly stand by what I said. I was not equating drug use with rape and murder. I was questioning the logic. "If people are going to do (fill in the blank) anyway, why not legalize it?" Regardless of what "it" is. That is simply not logical, because it can be applied to anything.
Call me an unrepentant libertarian, but it SHOULD be applied to anything that doesn't directly cause physical harm to someone else. Obviously driving under the influence of anything psychoactive should remain illegal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2008, 08:54 PM
 
2,751 posts, read 5,361,986 times
Reputation: 1779
Quote:
Originally Posted by creepsinc View Post
By "drug literature", I mean just about every book written on the subject in the past 40 years. Should I be consulting FDA statistics, or perhaps the DEA? Or should I stick with controlled studies conducted by respected scientists who actually know what they're talking about. Forgive me for wanting to take my book collection with me when I moved across the country.
Controlled studies of course. See, I tend to agree with you on this, but for others on this forum and elsewhere that don't, if you could talk about other countries that have legalized or decriminalized drugs, talk about what they have seen, as far as addiction rates, crime rates, overall social effect over a span of five, ten, fifteen years, that kind of thing. Speaking for myself, I just don't know. That's why I asked.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2008, 09:00 PM
 
Location: RVA
2,420 posts, read 4,710,930 times
Reputation: 1212
Quote:
Originally Posted by ExPit View Post
Controlled studies of course. See, I tend to agree with you on this, but for others on this forum and elsewhere that don't, if you could talk about other countries that have legalized or decriminalized drugs, talk about what they have seen, as far as addiction rates, crime rates, overall social effect over a span of five, ten, fifteen years, that kind of thing. Speaking for myself, I just don't know. That's why I asked.
Well, as far as I know, there still isn't a country on earth that has legalized hard drugs. Technically, even pot is still illegal in the Netherlands. I'm more concerned with the history of drug use and the physiological aspects of it. I do know that marijuana has been used medicinally for thousands of years and we're still waiting on a fatality. Compare that to alcohol. Heroin wouldn't kill nearly as many people as it does if it was regulated. People die from drug overdoses because of purity issues.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2008, 09:02 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,694,120 times
Reputation: 35920
You know, I studied alcoholism in grad school at the University of Colorado. I don't remember any such statistic about 10% of users developing a problem. Even if that is correct, which it may be, if you understood epidemiology you would know that 10% of a given populaton is a HUGE number.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Pennsylvania > Pittsburgh
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:41 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top