Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Pennsylvania > Pittsburgh
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-23-2010, 03:15 PM
 
Location: Hell with the lid off, baby!
2,193 posts, read 5,801,316 times
Reputation: 380

Advertisements

Woot!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-23-2010, 04:22 PM
 
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
6,327 posts, read 9,148,549 times
Reputation: 4053
More good news I saw from the census bureau!! Allegheny County's population went from 1,218,227 to 1,218,494; so the county gained over 200 people which isn't much but the first gain in a long time!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2010, 05:32 PM
 
Location: The canyon (with my pistols and knife)
14,186 posts, read 22,727,826 times
Reputation: 17393
Eh, problem is, one year of positive growth won't compensate for nine years of negative growth.

But that's what the 2020 Census is for.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2010, 05:36 PM
 
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
6,327 posts, read 9,148,549 times
Reputation: 4053
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gnutella View Post
Eh, problem is, one year of positive growth won't compensate for nine years of negative growth.

But that's what the 2020 Census is for.
Yea but that's not what excites me. What excites me is that after decades of lowering population the area is turning a corner finally! The question I have though if it is also that people are not moving and staying put and they may be planning to move out though once the recession is over.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2010, 05:40 PM
 
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
6,327 posts, read 9,148,549 times
Reputation: 4053
Plus I also doubt the lost of about 30 to 40k people from 2003 to 2007 (I feel that may be exaggerated a little bit )
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2010, 07:14 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,694,120 times
Reputation: 35920
Quote:
Originally Posted by bradjl2009 View Post
Plus I also doubt the lost of about 30 to 40k people from 2003 to 2007 (I feel that may be exaggerated a little bit )
It's actually 43,872

Pittsburgh, PA MSA Population and Components of Change
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2010, 05:54 AM
 
20,273 posts, read 33,003,811 times
Reputation: 2911
As an aside, I think the Census estimates for population losses in the City of Pittsburgh in the mid-2000s are likely to prove on the high side, based on things like the data from the American Community Survey and understanding the estimate methodology for subcounty places.

But anyway--historically people in the United States have always moved during recessions to the places with relatively low unemployment, so this is no surprise. In fact there were preliminary indications of this in the employment data: our labor force (people working or actively looking for work) has spiked up, which in circumstances like this strongly implies job-seekers have migrated to the region.

Now on the one hand that effect is probably going to end at some point. But on the other hand, it may be a while--unemployment nationally likely won't return to normal levels for years, and it is possible Pittsburgh will stay ahead of the curve that whole time. Moreover, migration has been kept modest this time due to all the disruptions in the housing market, which make it harder for people to move. Slowly but surely, however, people are working out of that situation (every foreclosure, short sale, and so on is another household freed up to move if they want), and we may see some pent-up migration come through in the next couple years.

Anyway, should be interesting. The bottomline is we will need to be aggressive about making sure people are finding work in the local economy, such that this growth is economically beneficial and doesn't just add to the local unemployed population. I think we will do OK, but to the extent there are projects that can be accelerated, we should really do that so we provide as many near-term employment opportunities as possible.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2010, 06:32 AM
 
Location: The canyon (with my pistols and knife)
14,186 posts, read 22,727,826 times
Reputation: 17393
Pittsburgh MSA population breakdown by county

Allegheny County

2008 population: 1,218,227
2009 population: 1,218,494
Change year/year: +267

Armstrong County

2008 population: 68,449
2009 population: 67,851
Change year/year: -598

Beaver County

2008 population: 172,396
2009 population: 171,673
Change year/year: -723

Butler County

2008 population: 183,663
2009 population: 184,694
Change year/year: +1,031

Fayette County

2008 population: 143,289
2009 population: 142,605
Change year/year: -684

Washington County

2008 population: 206,740
2009 population: 207,389
Change year/year: +649

Westmoreland County

2008 population: 362,627
2009 population: 362,251
Change year/year: -376

Pittsburgh MSA

2008 population: 2,355,391
2009 population: 2,354,957
Change year/year: -434

As I suspected, population gains in Allegheny, Butler and Washington Counties were wiped out by population losses in Armstrong, Beaver, Fayette and Westmoreland Counties. To simplify it, if I-79 travels through the county, it gained population. If not, it lost population. The good news is, the core of the metro area is relatively healthy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2010, 07:18 AM
 
20,273 posts, read 33,003,811 times
Reputation: 2911
The rural parts of the Pittsburgh MSA are very likely to keep losing population, and the urbanized part (which includes major suburbs) was actually already gaining population as of the 2000 Census. The rural-to-urban/suburban population shift has been going on throughout American history, and will undoubtedly continue.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2010, 08:00 AM
 
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
6,327 posts, read 9,148,549 times
Reputation: 4053
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katiana View Post
Whoops. But I still agree with BrianTH that those loss estimates may prove to be a bit high. Personally, no one I know personally well has moved out of Pittsburgh (other than joining military).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Pennsylvania > Pittsburgh

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:24 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top