Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-15-2010, 12:43 PM
 
Location: Florida
1,313 posts, read 1,550,778 times
Reputation: 462

Advertisements

I finally found something more than just a passing mention of the NBO

Paul's ophthalmological crusade

Quote:
For all Paul's passion, his National Board remains something like the Libertarian Party of ophthalmology. Registered in Kentucky and governed by Paul and two family members, it continues – Paul spokesman Jesse Benton said – to run a formal, confidential recertification process for ABOP dissidents that is much like that of ABO itself. The group has no website and no public presence, but it most recently recertified a doctor just two weeks ago, Benton said. Paul, in his statement, suggested that the American Board of Medical Specialties had refused to embrace his rival group to protect ABOP, one of it charter members, though there's no evidence Paul ever seriously sought formal recognition.

The National Board of Ophthalmology "never quite caught fire like Rand and the 200 other ophthalmologists had hoped, but it continues to offer quality, trustworthy certifications for ophthalmologists," said Benton.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-15-2010, 12:45 PM
 
35,016 posts, read 39,145,685 times
Reputation: 6195
Quote:
Originally Posted by chattypatty View Post
An ophthalmologist is a DOCTOR, as in, an MD. An ophthalmologist is also a SURGEON. To become an ophthalmologist, one must complete a four year medical school PLUS a three or four year medical residency specializing in ophthalmology medicine and surgery. Furthermore, there are fellowships for those who want further training in a subspecialty.

I believe in your mind, you were thinking of "optometrist," which is an eye doctor though not a medical doctor/surgeon.

A dictionary around the house is useful for learning these distinctions.


The boards under discussion are the American Board of Ophthalmology and Rand Paul's personal one he made in his clubhouse with stationery and a P.O. address.

I've typed essentially that same sentence so many times in this thread I can now spell Ophthalmology without a dictionary.... thanks, though

Many of you have confused the legitimate board with the AMA. For best results, try reading through the posts in this thread, and the several articles linked herein
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-15-2010, 12:48 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,090,553 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by delusianne View Post
The boards under discussion are the American Board of Ophthalmology and Rand Paul's personal one he made in his clubhouse with stationery and a P.O. address.
And the problem is where? LOTS of businesses are started in the same method..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-15-2010, 12:49 PM
 
Location: Long Island (chief in S Farmingdale)
22,180 posts, read 19,453,569 times
Reputation: 5297
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
his organization is an actual organization. You not liking the fact that he exercised his right to take part in the free enterprise system, doesnt mean its not real..
Still quite misleading....

Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
I have yet to see this claim through all of the postings here.. Where did he claim he was certified by other organizations, and again, why do I care? All I care about is if he's licensed to practice in the field in which he operates..
Delusianne has posted it over and over again, he made the claim prior to the Primary in the Courier Journal (a Louisville paper)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-15-2010, 01:17 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,090,553 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smash255 View Post
Still quite misleading....
You have the nerve to tell me to stop misleading, while you start this thead accusing Paul of not being certified by organizations he doesnt need to be certified by..
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smash255 View Post
Delusianne has posted it over and over again, he made the claim prior to the Primary in the Courier Journal (a Louisville paper)
Delusional linked to two stories
Joseph Gerth | Rand Paul creates mistrust by refusing to answer questions about ophthalmology certification | courier-journal.com | The Courier-Journal
Rand Paul Defends His National Board of Ophthalmology In Certification Flap | TPMMuckraker
The first one makes no such accusation of Paul claiming he was certified by different boards, the second, is a story about Paul admitting that his certification had lapsed and he mis-spoke because the question was "unclear",

Again, where is Paul claiming he continued to have certification by some board that he doesnt even need to be certified by?

Pauls own statement acknowledge that he was NOT certified by the agencies currently, but was in the past.
Right Now - Rand Paul: I passed my ophthalmology certification, but took a stand against the way the board operates
I took the American Board of Ophthalmology (the largest governing body in ophthalmology) boards in 1995, passed them on my first attempt (as well as three times during residency), and was therefore board-certified under this organization for a decade.

In 1997, I, along with 200 other young ophthalmologists formed the National Board of Ophthalmology to protest the American Board of Ophthalmology's decision to grandfather in the older ophthalmologists and not require them to recertify.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-15-2010, 01:30 PM
 
Location: Long Island (chief in S Farmingdale)
22,180 posts, read 19,453,569 times
Reputation: 5297
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
You have the nerve to tell me to stop misleading, while you start this thead accusing Paul of not being certified by organizations he doesnt need to be certified by..

Delusional linked to two stories
Joseph Gerth | Rand Paul creates mistrust by refusing to answer questions about ophthalmology certification | courier-journal.com | The Courier-Journal
Rand Paul Defends His National Board of Ophthalmology In Certification Flap | TPMMuckraker
The first one makes no such accusation of Paul claiming he was certified by different boards, the second, is a story about Paul admitting that his certification had lapsed and he mis-spoke because the question was "unclear",

Again, where is Paul claiming he continued to have certification by some board that he doesnt even need to be certified by?

Pauls own statement acknowledge that he was NOT certified by the agencies currently, but was in the past.
Right Now - Rand Paul: I passed my ophthalmology certification, but took a stand against the way the board operates
I took the American Board of Ophthalmology (the largest governing body in ophthalmology) boards in 1995, passed them on my first attempt (as well as three times during residency), and was therefore board-certified under this organization for a decade.

In 1997, I, along with 200 other young ophthalmologists formed the National Board of Ophthalmology to protest the American Board of Ophthalmology's decision to grandfather in the older ophthalmologists and not require them to recertify.
I never said he needed to be certified by the organization, but when you claim to be board certified it generally means some board that is nationally recognizable, not some thing you made up yourself.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-15-2010, 01:36 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles, CA
287 posts, read 546,958 times
Reputation: 204
What is all the fus about?

Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009 View Post
1. The AMA does not certify ANYONE. They are a political organization and not a certifying entity

2. The National Board of Medical Examiners certifies physicians (through NBME parts 1-3). The NBME recognizes certified residencies and endorses the certification of specialists through specialty oral and written exams.

3. Osteopaths (DO) have a parallel certifcation process. DOs can take NBME and be board certified through the NBME if they attend a certified residency. However,there is a separate certification process as well available to DOs that is not recognized bythe NBME.

My primary care doc is a DO and is outstanding (I am a training snob). He went to a good MD residency and is boarded. I think that DOs who go to good MD residencies are equivilent to MDs, but many have a harder time getting into the better residencies relative to MD grads.


There are all sorts of "lick em, stick em" certifications that one can get, but the NBME carries the most credence.
Hawkeye Doc over here explains everything. Rand Paul graduated from Duke University one of the best medical schools in the world.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-15-2010, 01:41 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles, CA
287 posts, read 546,958 times
Reputation: 204
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smash255 View Post
I never said he needed to be certified by the organization, but when you claim to be board certified it generally means some board that is nationally recognizable, not some thing you made up yourself.
Uhh thats what the NBME is for?

The National Board of Medical Examiners®
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-15-2010, 01:50 PM
 
Location: Long Island (chief in S Farmingdale)
22,180 posts, read 19,453,569 times
Reputation: 5297
Quote:
Originally Posted by basketballakev View Post
Uhh thats what the NBME is for?

The National Board of Medical Examiners®
They are for licensing not certifications
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-15-2010, 04:00 PM
 
Location: Texas
37,949 posts, read 17,856,305 times
Reputation: 10371
Quote:
Originally Posted by delusianne View Post

He had claimed to be certified by both boards, but Courier-Journal reporter Joseph Gerth quickly discovered that claim was false.


He was going to repeal the civil rights act because msnbc said so. That was false.
You also said he hasn't addressed the issue, that was false.

Show me proof that he said what he did. Use a credible source besides a paper which has an agenda against Rand.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top