Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-14-2010, 07:02 PM
 
Location: Long Island (chief in S Farmingdale)
22,190 posts, read 19,470,309 times
Reputation: 5305

Advertisements

Rand Paul claims to be board certified Ophthalmologist, well he is board certified, by a board he created, not by the American Medical Association.

Quote:
U.S. Senate candidate Rand Paul says he is a "board-certified" ophthalmologist -- even though the national clearinghouse for such certifications says he hasn't been for the past five years.

Rand Paul, who practices in Bowling Green, says he is certified by the National Board of Ophthalmology, a group that he incorporated in 1999 and that he heads.

But that entity is not recognized by the American Board of Medical Specialties, which works with the American Medical Association to approve such specialty boards.
Rand Paul's ophthalmology certification not recognized by national clearinghouse | courier-journal.com | The Courier-Journal
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-14-2010, 07:18 PM
 
Location: somewhere in the woods
16,880 posts, read 15,203,858 times
Reputation: 5240
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smash255 View Post
Rand Paul claims to be board certified Ophthalmologist, well he is board certified, by a board he created, not by the American Medical Association.



Rand Paul's ophthalmology certification not recognized by national clearinghouse | courier-journal.com | The Courier-Journal

I know some doctors right now that do not belong to the AMA as they consider it to be the same as a union for doctors and they do not approve of unions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2010, 07:19 PM
 
23,838 posts, read 23,131,520 times
Reputation: 9409
How does that compare to the 29 percent of doctors who are members of the AMA, even as Nancy Pelosi trotted out in front of the cameras to proclaim that Obamacare had the full support of the AMA - as if that were the Mother of All Endorsements?

I'm not sure how it compares. But from my vantage point, 29 percent means diddly squat and completely eroded my faith in the Association as an arbiter of good principles. Therefore I don't give a rip what they say now regarding Rand Paul.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2010, 07:20 PM
 
Location: Land of debt and Corruption
7,545 posts, read 8,329,379 times
Reputation: 2889
Medical professions often have many different accrediting, certification, and licensing bodies. For my profession, we can get certification from two different national organizations (or neither), but we must be licensed in our state to practice in my field. Most states mirror their licensing requirements after the certification requirements, but certification itself is optional. Some employers require it, but it's really not necessary. Rand Paul apparently did hold board certification through the National Board of Opthamologists which means he met the educational and professional requirements through that organization. He let that certification lapse, meaning he didn't pay his annual dues. There is really nothing outrageous about this. The only thing that really matters is that he is licensed to practice in his state (if he is practicing still).

Quote:
The specialties board recognizes the American Board of Ophthalmology, the nation's main ophthalmological certification group. Paul had certification from that organization before he let it lapse after he started his National Board of Ophthalmology.
Switching from one accrediting agency to another (even if he started it himself) is not unheard of in the medical field. People do it in my field all the time. Being recognized by the AMA is kind of meaningless. Only 20% of physicians are even members of the AMA, so it's kind of irrelevant.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2010, 07:32 PM
 
Location: Neither here nor there
14,810 posts, read 16,211,393 times
Reputation: 33001
Default Your thread title is misleading......

The AMA is a professional organization and does not "certify" physicians. There are many medical certification boards in this country that are independent of the AMA and the American Board of Medical Specialties. Only about 22% of physicians in the US are members of the AMA. Membership is strictly voluntary and many physicians shun membership. The AMA exists today as much as a political lobby as anything else. It has enormous influence, along with Big Pharma, in both Congress and the FDA and their goal is to protect their interests.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2010, 07:37 PM
 
Location: The Woods
18,358 posts, read 26,503,289 times
Reputation: 11351
The AMA is a left-leaning union of sorts, basically. My doctor is not a member. Most aren't.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2010, 07:37 PM
 
Location: Hoboken
19,890 posts, read 18,758,413 times
Reputation: 3146
The left grasping at straws again. Just sit back relax it will al be over in November. You can't stop it so just step aside.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2010, 07:42 PM
 
Location: Vermont
11,761 posts, read 14,659,204 times
Reputation: 18534
Being a member of the AMA has nothing to do with it.

The American Board of Medical Specialties is an independent organization that certifies medical specialists based on known, rigorous education, training, and testing requirements.

And the certification standards for Rand Paul's group? Well, who knows? At a minimum, it appears that they don't require periodic recertification.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2010, 07:43 PM
 
Location: Home, Home on the Front Range
25,826 posts, read 20,710,498 times
Reputation: 14818
Interesting.

He basically certified himself.

Well, that's free enterprise for you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2010, 07:45 PM
 
Location: Here
11,578 posts, read 13,952,362 times
Reputation: 7009
Who cares? Are you planning on seeing him for an eye exam?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:47 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top