Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-23-2010, 01:27 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,081,664 times
Reputation: 9383

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
Is anyone else besides Beck saying this?

What company is Petrobras trying to lease the rigs from?
Not everything is Beck..
Global Energy :: Rig Tender Deadline Delayed Again (http://www.energiahoje.com/globalenergy/2010/06/16/412490/rig-tender-deadline-delayed-again.html - broken link)

Petrobras once again has extended the deadline, this time until June 27, for the delivery of proposals for the third tender package for drill rigs, for the lease of one or more units, with the possibility of offering a semi-submersible or mono-column and with the requirement that they must be built in Brazil. Furthermore, yet another delay is still possible.

http://foro.univision.com/t5/Cubanos.../m-p/397369787
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-23-2010, 01:29 PM
 
999 posts, read 2,010,531 times
Reputation: 1200
Hmmmm. The judge who issued the order has a conflict of interest here.

Katrina’s “who dat Judge Martin Feldman” now dabbling in oil! « slabbed

Those darn activist judges who put their own financial interests before the law.

The higher courts will overturn this judge who is in the pockets of the fossil fuel industry.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2010, 01:34 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,081,664 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by coldbliss View Post
Hmmmm. The judge who issued the order has a conflict of interest here.

Katrina’s “who dat Judge Martin Feldman” now dabbling in oil! « slabbed

Those darn activist judges who put their own financial interests before the law.

The higher courts will overturn this judge who is in the pockets of the fossil fuel industry.
Why do you guys continue to read news sources that outright LIE to you?

Those financials are from 2008.. What year is it NOW?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2010, 01:36 PM
 
Location: The Heartland
4,458 posts, read 4,190,417 times
Reputation: 760
Quote:
Originally Posted by coldbliss View Post
Hmmmm. The judge who issued the order has a conflict of interest here.

Katrina’s “who dat Judge Martin Feldman” now dabbling in oil! « slabbed

Those darn activist judges who put their own financial interests before the law.

The higher courts will overturn this judge who is in the pockets of the fossil fuel industry.

Some environmental groups sought to highlight the judge's investments in oil and gas companies. Judge Feldman owned shares in a wide variety of energy firms, including onshore oil and gas producers, pipeline companies and shallow-water drilling contractors, none of which would likely be directly affected by the deep-water moratorium.


But he also had investments in companies that have been affected. In 2008, he owned stock in Transocean Ltd., the deep water-drilling specialist that owned the Deepwater Horizon. He also owned stock in offshore oil producer ATP Oil & Gas, offshore driller Rowan and oil services firm Halliburton, but had sold those shares by the end of 2008.


When asked about his holdings, a secretary for Judge Feldman, referred to the "public record" of his filings, but the most recent filing was not available from the federal court. In a May 24 order in a separate case tied to the oil spill, the judge noted his holdings do not raise a conflict of interest.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2010, 01:43 PM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,861,612 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
Not everything is Beck..
Global Energy :: Rig Tender Deadline Delayed Again (http://www.energiahoje.com/globalenergy/2010/06/16/412490/rig-tender-deadline-delayed-again.html - broken link)

Petrobras once again has extended the deadline, this time until June 27, for the delivery of proposals for the third tender package for drill rigs, for the lease of one or more units, with the possibility of offering a semi-submersible or mono-column and with the requirement that they must be built in Brazil. Furthermore, yet another delay is still possible.

Obama
Neither of your links responds to my questions.

The poster I was querying stated that Petrobras was calling companies in the gulf within 24 hours of the moratorium about leasing rigs.

I could only find a Glenn Beck story on this, and several blogs repeating Beck, and asked if any other news source was saying this.

Beck mentioned one company, I think it was Lourdes Marine. I couldn't find that the company Beck mentions actually controls any leasing rigs, so I asked for more information.

Your links simply report that a deep-well company that is not involved in the Gulf will benefit from this disaster. In much the same way as companies not involved in Alaskan ventures benefited from the Exxon-Valdez disaster. That's not news, that's common sense. Your links also say that companies have been contacting Petrobras, not the other way around.

So my questions stand.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2010, 02:06 PM
 
16,545 posts, read 13,447,180 times
Reputation: 4243
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
Neither of your links responds to my questions.

The poster I was querying stated that Petrobras was calling companies in the gulf within 24 hours of the moratorium about leasing rigs.

I could only find a Glenn Beck story on this, and several blogs repeating Beck, and asked if any other news source was saying this.

Beck mentioned one company, I think it was Lourdes Marine. I couldn't find that the company Beck mentions actually controls any leasing rigs, so I asked for more information.

Your links simply report that a deep-well company that is not involved in the Gulf will benefit from this disaster. In much the same way as companies not involved in Alaskan ventures benefited from the Exxon-Valdez disaster. That's not news, that's common sense. Your links also say that companies have been contacting Petrobras, not the other way around.

So my questions stand.
Petrobras declined to comment about them leasing the idle rigs, but they are willing to take them:

RIO DE JANEIRO, June 11 (Reuters) - Brazil could benefit
from the BP Gulf of Mexico spill as a U.S. moratorium on
offshore drilling boosts available rigs for the country's deep
water oil exploration program.
Even as an ecological catastrophe makes the future of U.S.offshore drilling less certain, Brazil is plowing ahead with a$220 billion five-year plan to tap oil fields even deeper thanBP's (BP.L) ill-fated Gulf well, which is still leaking crude. With an estimated 35 rigs idled in the Gulf of Mexico,Brazil is already receiving inquiries from companies looking tomove their rigs here, where vast discoveries in recent yearsmay soon turn the country into a major crude exporter. "What is bad for some may be good for others," saidFernando Martins, Latin America Vice President for GE Oil andGas, which provides services to drillers in Brazil. "Since operators are shutting down at least temporarily inthe U.S. Gulf, some companies are planning to move their rigsto Brazil now," he said, without offering details.


I wonder why they wouldn't offer details about companies planning to move their rigs there?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2010, 02:14 PM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,861,612 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by SourD View Post
Petrobras declined to comment about them leasing the idle rigs, but they are willing to take them:

RIO DE JANEIRO, June 11 (Reuters) - Brazil could benefit
from the BP Gulf of Mexico spill as a U.S. moratorium on
offshore drilling boosts available rigs for the country's deep
water oil exploration program.
Even as an ecological catastrophe makes the future of U.S.offshore drilling less certain, Brazil is plowing ahead with a$220 billion five-year plan to tap oil fields even deeper thanBP's (BP.L) ill-fated Gulf well, which is still leaking crude. With an estimated 35 rigs idled in the Gulf of Mexico,Brazil is already receiving inquiries from companies looking tomove their rigs here, where vast discoveries in recent yearsmay soon turn the country into a major crude exporter. "What is bad for some may be good for others," saidFernando Martins, Latin America Vice President for GE Oil andGas, which provides services to drillers in Brazil. "Since operators are shutting down at least temporarily inthe U.S. Gulf, some companies are planning to move their rigsto Brazil now," he said, without offering details.


I wonder why they wouldn't offer details about companies planning to move their rigs there?
Petrobrass declined to comment? Who asked them? That doesn't appear in your link. Would you care to comment?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2010, 02:20 PM
 
16,545 posts, read 13,447,180 times
Reputation: 4243
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
Petrobrass declined to comment? Who asked them? That doesn't appear in your link. Would you care to comment?
I would assume Reuters. It doesn't exactly say who did the interview.

The spill has temporarily halted new drilling in the Gulf
of Mexico and Alaska, and has spurred Norway, which 40 years
ago pioneered offshore drilling, to halt new licensing for now.
Brazil's state oil company Petrobras (PETR4.SA) (PBR.N),which already produces around a quarter of the world's deepwater oil, could be an obvious candidate to take newlyavailable rigs.
Petrobras declined to comment on the issue.

Brazil sees silver lining in BP spill: more rigs | Reuters
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2010, 02:26 PM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,861,612 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by SourD View Post
I would assume Reuters. It doesn't exactly say who did the interview.

The spill has temporarily halted new drilling in the Gulf
of Mexico and Alaska, and has spurred Norway, which 40 years
ago pioneered offshore drilling, to halt new licensing for now.
Brazil's state oil company Petrobras (PETR4.SA) (PBR.N),which already produces around a quarter of the world's deepwater oil, could be an obvious candidate to take newlyavailable rigs.
Petrobras declined to comment on the issue.

Brazil sees silver lining in BP spill: more rigs | Reuters
Thanks for actually providing a link.

And back to the original question. You stated that Petrobras was calling companies in the gulf within 48 hours of the moratorium. Can you substantiate that claim?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2010, 02:58 PM
 
16,545 posts, read 13,447,180 times
Reputation: 4243
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
Thanks for actually providing a link.

And back to the original question. You stated that Petrobras was calling companies in the gulf within 48 hours of the moratorium. Can you substantiate that claim?
Try this for starters

Within 48 hours after President Obama issued the six-month moratorium on deep-water drilling, the George Soros-backed Brazilian oil company, Petrobras, contacted a large New Orleans company, Laborde Marine, which services the deep-water drilling market. The company was seeking to lease all its vessels. “If the moratorium on deep-water drilling is not lifted, 33 semi-submersible rigs and/or drill ships affected will simply go to other countries where they will be well received, such as Brazil,” Cliffe F. Laborde and J. Peter Laborde, Jr. wrote in a June 4 letter to their Louisiana Senators.

Soros’s Oil Spill Payoff | FrontPage Magazine
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top