Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-01-2010, 11:50 AM
 
Location: North America
19,784 posts, read 15,104,274 times
Reputation: 8527

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by SourD View Post
Being a bit obtuse are you? Let me ask you this. How far out are the foreign vessels working? Who is doing the cleanup close to shore?
From the same website:

Unified Command for the BP Oil Spill | Mobile Unified Command Provides Update on Perdido Pass

Nearshore skimming vessels are working near the west end of Dauphin Island, the mouth of Mobile Bay, Gulf Shores, Ala., Orange Beach, Ala., and Pensacola, Fla. More than 65,400 gallons of oil-water mix were collected Thursday in the Gulf waters as far as 50 miles off shore.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-01-2010, 12:03 PM
 
Location: Imaginary Figment
11,449 posts, read 14,461,350 times
Reputation: 4777
Quote:
Originally Posted by carterstamp View Post
There is a document on that website that outlines the waiver in specifics. Click on it and read it.
Too much to ask I'm afraid.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2010, 12:07 PM
 
Location: North America
19,784 posts, read 15,104,274 times
Reputation: 8527
Quote:
Originally Posted by SLCPUNK View Post
Too much to ask I'm afraid.

It's one click. There are daily updates and press conferences there. It explains what has been done and what is currently in place.

The fact is, foreign vessels are already there. Nearshore skimmers are already there. The "berms" that Gov. Jindall was asking for were approved way back in May. The Jones Act doesn't apply in most cases, and when it is, there are fast track procedures in place.

And, as an extra added bonus, from the same website, the Jones Act Fact sheet.

http://www.deepwaterhorizonresponse....eet.670991.pdf
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2010, 12:12 PM
 
16,545 posts, read 13,447,180 times
Reputation: 4243
Quote:
Originally Posted by carterstamp View Post
It's one click. There are daily updates and press conferences there. It explains what has been done and what is currently in place.

The fact is, foreign vessels are already there. Nearshore skimmers are already there. The "berms" that Gov. Jindall was asking for were approved way back in May. The Jones Act doesn't apply in most cases, and when it is, there are fast track procedures in place.
I see you are finally admitting, since you posted it several times, that the foreign vessels are working out at 50 miles. The Jones Act needs to be waived for anything within 3 miles of shore AND so they can pull into our ports. So the thread is a failure to call the Jones Act a lie.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2010, 12:16 PM
 
20,458 posts, read 12,373,731 times
Reputation: 10250
oh the boondoggle this is! bottom line here is that 50 odd countries have offered assistance and there are giant swaths of ocean that are not being cleaned and the majority of the offers have not been accepted or approved.

THAT is the issue. Telling the world that Republicans are lying is the diversion!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2010, 12:21 PM
 
10,545 posts, read 13,580,303 times
Reputation: 2823
If there are no government obstacles to overcome, I wonder what the motive would be for this company to delay getting their vessel, that was built for this specific reason, into place and skimming. I find it interesting that they would build it for this purpose, decide to delay getting it there, and then say they're waiting on permits and contracts. How did they get the government to state that they don't have a timetable but will get a report as soon as possible? Is it more likely that company is delaying their work or that there are government obstacles and politicians making half statements to protect their image?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2010, 12:22 PM
 
Location: North America
19,784 posts, read 15,104,274 times
Reputation: 8527
Quote:
Originally Posted by SourD View Post
I see you are finally admitting, since you posted it several times, that the foreign vessels are working out at 50 miles. The Jones Act needs to be waived for anything within 3 miles of shore AND so they can pull into our ports. So the thread is a failure to call the Jones Act a lie.

No, it isn't. Look at the context in which it was used by the pundits. Nearshore skimming is already being done.

Again, use the link and find out what is and isn't being done.

Another link:

http://www.mctf.com/Jones_Act_not_oil_spill_clean-up_impediment.pdf (broken link)

In addition, even within 3 miles, the Coast Guard Federal On-Scene Commander (FOSC) may use foreign skimmers when an adequate number and type of U.S. oil spill response vessels are not available. The FOSC does not need to ask the President, the Secretary of Homeland Security, or even the Commandant of the Coast Guard for permission to use foreign skimmer vessels under this authority.

Clear enough now, or do you need a blackboard and chalk?

Last edited by carterstamp; 07-01-2010 at 12:31 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2010, 12:31 PM
 
16,545 posts, read 13,447,180 times
Reputation: 4243
Quote:
Originally Posted by carterstamp View Post
No, it isn't. Look at the context in which it was used by the pundits. Nearshore skimming is already being done.
I'm done arguing with you about it. Everything you posted mentioned foreign vessels working out passed the 3 mile range. American flagged vessels are doing the near shore skimming. The Coast Gaurd made a determination to allow foreign vessels to help in the near shore skimming when needed, hence the fast track to the Jones Act waivers. The point being here is that this thread is a huge spin that provides half the truth but tries to come across like the whole story is being told.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2010, 12:35 PM
 
Location: North America
19,784 posts, read 15,104,274 times
Reputation: 8527
Quote:
Originally Posted by SourD View Post
I'm done arguing with you about it. Everything you posted mentioned foreign vessels working out passed the 3 mile range. American flagged vessels are doing the near shore skimming. The Coast Gaurd made a determination to allow foreign vessels to help in the near shore skimming when needed, hence the fast track to the Jones Act waivers. The point being here is that this thread is a huge spin that provides half the truth but tries to come across like the whole story is being told.

You're done arguing because I have proven that the OP is correct.

Stay blissfully ignorant.

Again, from the link I posted:

When there is a need but no American vessel is available, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) in the Department of Homeland Security is authorized to waive the Jones Act and bring in a foreign vessel.

The Maritime Administration in the Department of Transportation is responsible for promptly determining, and informing CBP of, the availability of qualified Jones Act vessels for specific transportation requirements described in such waiver requests.

The American maritime industry has not and will not stand in the way of the use of these well-established waiver procedures to address this crisis.

On June 15, 2010, Admiral Thad Allen, USCG, the National Incident Commander for the BP oil spill, announced the development of specific guidance to ensure the accelerated processing of requests for Jones Act waivers. His announcement further streamlines an already streamlined process.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2010, 05:51 AM
 
Location: North America
19,784 posts, read 15,104,274 times
Reputation: 8527
Amazing, the people who cut and run in the face of facts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:55 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top