Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-01-2010, 09:20 AM
 
2,851 posts, read 3,475,383 times
Reputation: 1200

Advertisements

Because when we go for medical/law schools we need top scores. We don't get a racial modifier. At the medical school where I know people on the admit board they routinely let in significantly lower scoring minority female applicants to increase racial diversity. We're talking 24MCAT and <3.0 SGPA.

Suffolk/Nassau PD give 10% bonus to minorities. 20,000 people tried to get 100 positions just to show you how good the jobs are. You basically need over 100% to get one. Normally that means you were ex-military or a lateral transfer cop... or you could just have a different skin color. Great way to select!

Two quick examples.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-01-2010, 09:50 AM
 
10,449 posts, read 12,464,091 times
Reputation: 12597
Quote:
Originally Posted by SilverBulletZ06 View Post
Because when we go for medical/law schools we need top scores. We don't get a racial modifier. At the medical school where I know people on the admit board they routinely let in significantly lower scoring minority female applicants to increase racial diversity. We're talking 24MCAT and <3.0 SGPA.

Suffolk/Nassau PD give 10% bonus to minorities. 20,000 people tried to get 100 positions just to show you how good the jobs are. You basically need over 100% to get one. Normally that means you were ex-military or a lateral transfer cop... or you could just have a different skin color. Great way to select!

Two quick examples.
Affirmative action in colleges is just one small piece of the whole pie. It's an attempt to balance things out (and not a very effective one if you ask me because in lowering the bar for minorities, it just raises the likelihood for majorities to make an association between the minority group and lower intelligence), but when looking at the whole picture, white (straight masculine Christian able-bodied middle-class/rich etc.) men still have the upper hand.

Affirmative action doesn't change the way people think either. People still have racist and sexist beliefs, whether they're conscious or unconscious. If anything, affirmative action gives people who have racist tendencies justification in their minds. I'd even go as far as to say Affirmative Action hurts more than it helps. After all, what good is a scholarship to Harvard if everyone just thinks you got in cause you're "a minority"?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-01-2010, 02:50 PM
 
3,424 posts, read 5,976,319 times
Reputation: 1849
I think people tend to assume that because there is no institutional label on nepotism and legacies, that everyone should then be naive enough to believe that ALL non minorities got into Harvard on their own merits either. The way these things work is that certain people get in based on who they know, which has historically speaking, been directly correlated to race, and others get in based on racial/gender norming, which is also directly based race. The only difference is that one form is a seemingly passive, and largely unspoken form of preferential treatment, and the latter is an overt and aggressive form of preferential treatment.

Last edited by solytaire; 08-01-2010 at 02:58 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-01-2010, 03:21 PM
 
6,993 posts, read 6,339,494 times
Reputation: 2824
Quote:
Originally Posted by momonkey View Post
OK, then find the strenth to spell check!
Back at ya....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-01-2010, 03:28 PM
 
Location: New Kensington (Parnassus) ,Pa
2,422 posts, read 2,279,688 times
Reputation: 603
Quote:
Originally Posted by SilverBulletZ06 View Post
Because when we go for medical/law schools we need top scores. We don't get a racial modifier. At the medical school where I know people on the admit board they routinely let in significantly lower scoring minority female applicants to increase racial diversity. We're talking 24MCAT and <3.0 SGPA.

Suffolk/Nassau PD give 10% bonus to minorities. 20,000 people tried to get 100 positions just to show you how good the jobs are. You basically need over 100% to get one. Normally that means you were ex-military or a lateral transfer cop... or you could just have a different skin color. Great way to select!

Two quick examples.
Here we go again, more dumbing down of Ameica. If you don't have what it takes to make it as a doctor or a lawyer, then go into a field you are qualified for.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-01-2010, 03:34 PM
 
Location: New Kensington (Parnassus) ,Pa
2,422 posts, read 2,279,688 times
Reputation: 603
Quote:
Originally Posted by solytaire View Post
I think people tend to assume that because there is no institutional label on nepotism and legacies, that everyone should then be naive enough to believe that ALL non minorities got into Harvard on their own merits either. The way these things work is that certain people get in based on who they know, which has historically speaking, been directly correlated to race, and others get in based on racial/gender norming, which is also directly based race. The only difference is that one form is a seemingly passive, and largely unspoken form of preferential treatment, and the latter is an overt and aggressive form of preferential treatment.
Sorry to bust your bubble, but most people get in because they made the grade to do so!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-01-2010, 03:37 PM
 
720 posts, read 691,383 times
Reputation: 204
Quote:
Originally Posted by aveojohn View Post
Here we go again, more dumbing down of Ameica. If you don't have what it takes to make it as a doctor or a lawyer, then go into a field you are qualified for.
Then the same standard applies to all those being allowed in with lower qualifications, because of their race?

Me, I say if you can't do the job you don't get it. That applies to everyone, everywhere! I don't care if you were born with a purple stripe down your back..you want something, be like everyone else, fight for it, and earn it..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-01-2010, 04:35 PM
 
3,424 posts, read 5,976,319 times
Reputation: 1849
Quote:
Originally Posted by aveojohn View Post
Sorry to bust your bubble, but most people get in because they made the grade to do so!
either way its only speculative...you declare that non minorities get in because they made the grade to do so, and others declare that minorities and women get in because they also made the grade to do so.

Besides, whats the problem with affirmative action if most people get in because they made the grade to do so anyway. Unless by "most people" you only meant non minority males...

Dont lose any sleep over bursting my bubble...it is well in tact..lol
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-01-2010, 04:40 PM
 
46,961 posts, read 25,998,208 times
Reputation: 29449
Quote:
Originally Posted by nzrugby View Post
Amusing to read that white American males have it hard as stated by some on this board.
So, how do you have it hard ?
Higher risk of sunburn.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-01-2010, 04:44 PM
 
Location: East Chicago, IN
3,100 posts, read 3,302,796 times
Reputation: 1697
Quote:
Originally Posted by aveojohn View Post
Sorry to bust your bubble, but most people get in because they made the grade to do so!
That is a lie. So many people have gotten into Ivy League schools due to who their daddy is or what wing they donated it's not even funny. Every single person has used connections to get something in school or work at some point. Whoever claims they did it via "hard work" just didn't know who was pulling the strings for them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:43 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top