Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-24-2013, 11:22 PM
 
Location: Old Mother Idaho
29,213 posts, read 22,351,209 times
Reputation: 23853

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by DRob4JC View Post
I bolded and underlined the operative possessive pronoun in your statement... THEIR estate.

The taxes are enacted when a person dies.

Stuff don't pay taxes - people do.
No. The taxes are collected when the estate is settled. People die all the time and leave estates that are never settled. That money goes into limbo until an heir is found. If no heir, the money just stays in the bank as a dead account.

There is a difference. Calling it a death tax may have been intended to be dramatic, but it misfired. It would have been much better to call it a survivor's tax.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-24-2013, 11:36 PM
 
Location: Bellevue
59 posts, read 52,637 times
Reputation: 31
What point is there to leave an inheritance if a large portion of it will be taxed away? Leaves no incentive to leave anything for your kids, sorry to say. Might as well make it mandatory to list the US government as a next of kin on wills.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2013, 11:37 PM
 
27,121 posts, read 15,305,548 times
Reputation: 12060
Quote:
Originally Posted by ovcatto View Post
First of all you can't permanently repeal anything.

Second, why are Republicans so insistent about not calling inheritance taxes, inheritance taxes?


Third, you can't permanently pass anything either.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2013, 11:48 PM
 
Location: Where they serve real ale.
7,242 posts, read 7,905,230 times
Reputation: 3497
The estate tax should stay at the 55% level (for estates over $20 million but none owed on estates less than that) as it isn't good for society to have so much of society's assets not earned and instead inherited. If you make the money then you get to enjoy it for your life time but, no, you don't get to set up inherited aristocracies. That's what is required if we want our country to be a meritocracy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-25-2013, 07:15 AM
 
Location: North America
5,960 posts, read 5,544,954 times
Reputation: 1951
Quote:
Originally Posted by Think4Yourself View Post
The estate tax should stay at the 55% level (for estates over $20 million but none owed on estates less than that) as it isn't good for society to have so much of society's assets not earned and instead inherited. If you make the money then you get to enjoy it for your life time but, no, you don't get to set up inherited aristocracies. That's what is required if we want our country to be a meritocracy.
I think most people wouldn't want the tax to be only 55%.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-25-2013, 08:58 AM
 
Location: Inyokern, CA
1,609 posts, read 1,078,941 times
Reputation: 549
Quote:
Originally Posted by chad3 View Post
Only 0.3% - 2% of Americans are effected by the estate tax (it only effects the super rich.)

Repealing Estate Tax Helps Rich, Harms Everyone Else | Op-Eds & Columns

Only 2% pay any estate tax, so ending it affects rich few - Baltimore Sun


I wish just (once) republicans would fight to help the poor and middle class. Republicans say "no" to high min wage laws, "no" to tax credits for regular workers, "no" to helping home foreclosure victims, and "no" to healthcare for all, ex.ex.


But its a big "YES" to ending the death tax, and the biggest "YES" of all for this,

Romney's Economic Plan Includes $6.6 Trillion Tax Cut For The Rich And Corporations | ThinkProgress


The death tax brings in huge revenues to shrink our deficits, and the above tax cuts would add $6.6 trillion to our national debt. But republicans don't care, but like Fox news and Rush radio says "the rich made all the right choices."
Here is some "food for thought" regarding your comment "I wish just (once) republicans would fight to help the poor and middle class. Republicans say "no" to high min wage laws, "no" to tax credits for regular workers, "no" to helping home foreclosure victims, and "no" to healthcare for..."

Republicans know and understand that the way to help all levels of society is to keep our "private enterprise" economic engine running. It is that private enterprise that provides jobs at all levels which keep our society vibrant and economically sound. When government "interfers" with their "so-called" help the middle class they interfer with the "engine" that provides those jobs.

It is also well known that all this "welfare" and "government-program giveaway" does nothing but deteriorate self responsibility and the human mind. I have stated many times on these forums that welfare and giveaway must be on the "local" level only where it is known who really needs charity and same can be controlled. The Federal government has long misused a statement within the Constitution; i.e., "provide for the general welfare..." "General Welfare" means "all" and "everyone" of the citizens of the United States. Welfare from the federal level (along with uncountable other give away's) does NOT benefit "all." It only benefits "some" which means it is unconstitutional. That's the means test. And when you actually stand "most" of government programs up to this requirement you find that almost all these welfare programs are illegally provided by the Feds. If they are necessary, only the States can provide same and it is a State issue to be decided by each individual State as to the real needs of that State.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top