Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-10-2010, 02:27 PM
 
8,893 posts, read 5,371,263 times
Reputation: 5696

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaggy001 View Post
You are right. He should stay uninsured. Then, if he and/or his wife get sick, they can go to the ER. Then, when the bills come in all he has to do is declare bankruptcy and then you, as the taxpayer, can pick up 100% of the cost.
I believe we'll be getting some compensation when he has to sell the condo.

Do you have an answer for how will he actually pay for his UHC? Or is that for other people to do?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-10-2010, 02:38 PM
 
14,247 posts, read 17,922,570 times
Reputation: 13807
Quote:
Originally Posted by Minethatbird View Post
I believe we'll be getting some compensation when he has to sell the condo.

Do you have an answer for how will he actually pay for his UHC? Or is that for other people to do?
Presumably he will be taxed at his marginal rate just like the rest of us.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2010, 02:42 PM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,818,277 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
How is this any different than individuals who dont go to work, and ask the governmet to pay for their own housing, their own food, and medicaid insurance?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick Roma View Post
A preview of events soon to come brought to you by Obamacare..........
To quote the father of this plan, Mitt Romney (then governor of MA):

"We can't have as a nation 40 million people — or, in my state, half a million — saying, 'I don't have insurance, and if I get sick, I want someone else to pay,'... It's a conservative idea,... individuals have responsibility for their own health care. I think it appeals to people on both sides of the aisle: insurance for everyone without a tax increase" (Link)

Unless conservatives like to speak from both ends, is this not really a conservative idea, as opposed to say UHC that I would rather see?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2010, 02:45 PM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,818,277 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by Minethatbird View Post
So I can pay for his and mine?
And you have been paying for him (and the other uninsured like him). Just because the idea didn't get through the sand doesn't mean it hasn't a fact of the system.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2010, 02:48 PM
 
14,247 posts, read 17,922,570 times
Reputation: 13807
Quote:
Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost View Post
To quote the father of this plan, Mitt Romney (then governor of MA):

"We can't have as a nation 40 million people — or, in my state, half a million — saying, 'I don't have insurance, and if I get sick, I want someone else to pay,'... It's a conservative idea,... individuals have responsibility for their own health care. I think it appeals to people on both sides of the aisle: insurance for everyone without a tax increase" (Link)

Unless conservatives like to speak from both ends, is this not really a conservative idea, as opposed to say UHC that I would rather see?
What I don't get is how fiscal conservatives can defend a system that is costing around $7,290 per person per year compared to $4,417 in Switzerland and $2,992 in the UK. And it isn't as though the results are measurably better.

I see myself as a middle of the road voter. But as someone who has been in business for years, the economics shock me.

I mean, it makes basic economic sense to say that we have a problem here. I would have thought that conservatives would be all over that one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2010, 02:56 PM
 
8,630 posts, read 9,137,436 times
Reputation: 5990
This is Obamacare in miniature. One truly becomes a slave to health insurance companies. If one was to respond to me saying otherwise, I'm sure your insurance is subsidized by an employer. The talking heads talk of small business being the backbone of this nation----not for long, how can they pay these premiums, only large businesses, state and federal for the most part. Another plan not sustainable overtime, just like our current one, just to line the pockets for for-profit insurance companies. Over time people will work primarily for insurance coverage, not homes, education etc. especially if this economy drags on in which it will. Obama pandered to big business with his bill, soon afterwards the Supreme court declared big business as people and can bribe politicians as much as they like setting up a huge revolt coming in 2014.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2010, 02:57 PM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,818,277 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaggy001 View Post
What I don't get is how fiscal conservatives can defend a system that is costing around $7,290 per person per year compared to $4,417 in Switzerland and $2,992 in the UK. And it isn't as though the results are measurably better.

I see myself as a middle of the road voter. But as someone who has been in business for years, the economics shock me.

I mean, it makes basic economic sense to say that we have a problem here. I would have thought that conservatives would be all over that one.
Because they are true believers in lip service. It gets them the high they crave. Politicians know that, and they keep them on that high.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2010, 03:02 PM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,818,277 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmking View Post
Over time people will work primarily for insurance coverage, not homes, education etc. especially if this economy drags on in which it will.
You think that hasn't been happening? I know people who are working only to have health insurance. If their employers didn't offer health insurance (many of those that do, have drastically reduced benefits over last decade or so), they would have long retired. These people are just waiting to qualify in Medicare after which they will retire.

THIS is another of those wrongs with America and access to health care. Unless we recognize access to health care as a rights issue, and take power away from corporations, the problem is only going to get worse, even with the Health Reform Bill that does address some issues, but doesn't handle the cost issue. I say... raise my taxes, use it as a premium and expand Medicare for all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2010, 03:02 PM
 
8,893 posts, read 5,371,263 times
Reputation: 5696
Quote:
Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost View Post
And you have been paying for him (and the other uninsured like him). Just because the idea didn't get through the sand doesn't mean it hasn't a fact of the system.
So perhaps he needs to be told to go buy insurance .... oh wait, Massachusetts has already done that, doesn't look like that has worked out well.

How much are you chipping in for a policy for him and his wife? You might as well, as you're paying for it anyways.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2010, 03:05 PM
 
8,893 posts, read 5,371,263 times
Reputation: 5696
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaggy001 View Post
Presumably he will be taxed at his marginal rate just like the rest of us.
Do you think his and his spouses marginal rate equals $800 per month?

That was the cost for a private policy, or at least the best policy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:21 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top