Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-11-2010, 05:01 AM
 
Location: Tampa Florida
22,229 posts, read 17,876,854 times
Reputation: 4585

Advertisements

The Repubs will likely bring this back up and there is a significant amount of public support for such an amendment. So it will provide them some political talking points for Nov., but the reality is, it would require 2 thirds vote in House and Senate, plus 38 States to ratify. Not going to happen, anytime soon, it would take many years to get it done. Who knows, the President's Deficit Commission may suggest some form of that. Right now, its just going to be meaningless talking point politics, much like the meaningless talking points on the 14th Amendment.

Republicans see balanced budget amendment as potent campaign weapon - TheHill.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-11-2010, 05:09 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,696,085 times
Reputation: 18521
The Contract with America.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2010, 05:55 AM
 
Location: Pa
20,300 posts, read 22,240,736 times
Reputation: 6553
Another partisan thread.
Both parties spew this rhetoric and neither follows through with it.
Both parties abuse the pork, both parties pander to special interest groups.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2010, 06:04 AM
 
Location: Tampa Florida
22,229 posts, read 17,876,854 times
Reputation: 4585
The "Contract with America", as expected, died in the Senate. But it did provide a lot of talking fodder leading up to the midterm election, and Repubs gained a majority. They are simply trying to use the issue again, for political gain, and know full well, it could never actually be accomplished without bipartisan support. Too many politicians, Repub and Dem, like spending on pet projects in their districts. Over many years, that may change and it gradually is. The public opinion of Congress in general, is not getting better. More and more politicians are recognizing that they will have to start listening to the public and act on their behalf. But, politicians also realize, that some of the things the public cries for are popular, but not necessarily, best.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2010, 06:06 AM
 
Location: Tampa Florida
22,229 posts, read 17,876,854 times
Reputation: 4585
Quote:
Originally Posted by tinman01 View Post
Another partisan thread.
Both parties spew this rhetoric and neither follows through with it.
Both parties abuse the pork, both parties pander to special interest groups.
No, both Party's know that the public responds to sound bites, not policies.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2010, 06:14 AM
 
30,087 posts, read 18,701,618 times
Reputation: 20908
Quote:
Originally Posted by florida.bob View Post
The Repubs will likely bring this back up and there is a significant amount of public support for such an amendment. So it will provide them some political talking points for Nov., but the reality is, it would require 2 thirds vote in House and Senate, plus 38 States to ratify. Not going to happen, anytime soon, it would take many years to get it done. Who knows, the President's Deficit Commission may suggest some form of that. Right now, its just going to be meaningless talking point politics, much like the meaningless talking points on the 14th Amendment.

Republicans see balanced budget amendment as potent campaign weapon - TheHill.com


Amazing. People are actually opposed to controlling the insane spending in congress and balancing the budget. Now I know that, as Michael Savage says, liberalism is a mental disorder.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2010, 06:25 AM
 
Location: Tampa Florida
22,229 posts, read 17,876,854 times
Reputation: 4585
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009 View Post
Amazing. People are actually opposed to controlling the insane spending in congress and balancing the budget. Now I know that, as Michael Savage says, liberalism is a mental disorder.
I am certainly not opposing the idea. I am stating that in this political environment, as with the environments of recent history, there is no way it could be accomplished. The Repubs know that and will just use the rhetoric for political gain, if they can. In order for a Balanced Budget to be accomplished, there will have to be a return to actual bipartisan representation. I don't see that in the near future.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2010, 06:32 AM
 
45,251 posts, read 26,498,346 times
Reputation: 25006
Quote:
Originally Posted by florida.bob View Post
The Repubs will likely bring this back up and there is a significant amount of public support for such an amendment. So it will provide them some political talking points for Nov., but the reality is, it would require 2 thirds vote in House and Senate, plus 38 States to ratify. Not going to happen, anytime soon, it would take many years to get it done. Who knows, the President's Deficit Commission may suggest some form of that. Right now, its just going to be meaningless talking point politics, much like the meaningless talking points on the 14th Amendment.

Republicans see balanced budget amendment as potent campaign weapon - TheHill.com
So by your logic, legislators acting on the will of their constituency is considered grandstanding.

What a nonsensical, partisan thread.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2010, 06:48 AM
 
Location: Tampa Florida
22,229 posts, read 17,876,854 times
Reputation: 4585
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank DeForrest View Post
So by your logic, legislators acting on the will of their constituency is considered grandstanding.

What a nonsensical, partisan thread.
I think there would be massive support for eliminating taxes entirely, does that mean it should be done? I think practical realities come into play.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2010, 06:57 AM
 
45,251 posts, read 26,498,346 times
Reputation: 25006
Quote:
Originally Posted by florida.bob View Post
I think there would be massive support for eliminating taxes entirely, does that mean it should be done? I think practical realities come into play.
commonly referred to as, the old sidestep.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:19 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top