Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 09-03-2010, 01:05 PM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,892 posts, read 16,075,809 times
Reputation: 3954

Advertisements

Am I the only one amused that Ergohead chose to illustrate InformedConsent's failure to respond with a video of a chicken?

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-03-2010, 01:06 PM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,892 posts, read 16,075,809 times
Reputation: 3954
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
I told you I'd be back, no?

And thank you again for keeping the facts of Obama's Constitutional ineligibility to be POTUS at the top of POC!
I love these threads at the top. More opportunity to make you personally look bad.

So... your answer to the question is "yes?"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-03-2010, 01:06 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,006 posts, read 44,813,405 times
Reputation: 13707
Quote:
Originally Posted by HistorianDude View Post
Since it's actually neither irrelevant, off-topic nor hypothetical
Yes it is, unless you're willing to claim that the unnamed person in your question is Obama. Are you willing to do so?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-03-2010, 01:08 PM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,892 posts, read 16,075,809 times
Reputation: 3954
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Yes it is, unless you're willing to claim that the unnamed person in your question is Obama. Are you willing to do so?
You already asked that question. It was answered yesterday.

See... I actually am not afraid to answer questions.

So... your answer is "Yes?"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-03-2010, 01:10 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,006 posts, read 44,813,405 times
Reputation: 13707
Quote:
Originally Posted by HistorianDude View Post
I love these threads at the top. More opportunity to make you personally look
You have that backwards. lol

I've posted facts regarding Obama's Constitutional ineligibility. You're stuck on an irrelevant hypothetical question. That is, unless you're willing to claim the unnamed person in your 'question' is Obama. Is it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-03-2010, 01:14 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,006 posts, read 44,813,405 times
Reputation: 13707
Quote:
Originally Posted by HistorianDude View Post
You already asked that question. It was answered yesterday.
Link the post with your answer to the question of if the unnamed person in your hypothetical question is Obama.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-03-2010, 01:15 PM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,892 posts, read 16,075,809 times
Reputation: 3954
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
You have that backwards. lol

I've posted facts regarding Obama's Constitutional ineligibility. You're stuck on an irrelevant hypothetical question. That is, unless you're willing to claim the unnamed person in your 'question' is Obama. Is it?
Of course it's not. What a dumb question, and not because you're still asking it after it was answered yesterday.

Obama was born in Hawaii. You know that.

So it's not hypothetical, because it's a real person. I can even show you their birth certificate.

It's not off topic, because the topic is your phony definition of natural born citizen.

And it's not irrelevant because it is directly relevant to that phony theory.

Now.. yes or no. One simple word. You've already spent hundreds in your cowardly dodging of the question.

So... your answer is "yes?"

Here it is again, in case you forgot:

Do you believe that a person born in Los Angeles, California to two U.S. citizen parents who were both born in Erie, Pennsylvania is a natural born citizen?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-03-2010, 01:16 PM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,892 posts, read 16,075,809 times
Reputation: 3954
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Link the post with your answer to the question of if the unnamed person in your hypothetical question is Obama.
//www.city-data.com/forum/15735532-post576.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-03-2010, 01:19 PM
 
19,226 posts, read 15,319,728 times
Reputation: 2337
Quote:
Originally Posted by HistorianDude View Post
Am I the only one amused that Ergohead chose to illustrate InformedConsent's failure to respond with a video of a chicken?

Not just ANY chicken.

Pay, I say pay attention boy - I'm cuttin' but you ain't bleeding!


YouTube - Foghorn Leghorn Rant!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-03-2010, 01:25 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,006 posts, read 44,813,405 times
Reputation: 13707
Quote:
Originally Posted by HistorianDude View Post
So it's not hypothetical, because it's a real person. I can even show you their birth certificate.

It's not off topic, because the topic is your phony definition of natural born citizen.

And it's not irrelevant because it is directly relevant to that phony theory.
Not a phony theory. CLEARLY elucidated by John Jay in his letter to Washington on July 25, 1787:

Quote:
Permit me to hint whether it would not be wise and seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of Foreigners into the administration of our national Government, and to declare expressly that the Command in Chief of the American army shall not be given to nor devolve on, any but a natural born citizen.
The Papers of John Jay - View page 1 of 2

Info on John Jay:
http://www.columbia.edu/cu/lweb/digital/exhibitions/constitution/essay.html

Obama, self-admittedly a British citizen at birth (fightthesmears.com), was born a foreigner.

Foreigner: a person belonging to or owing allegiance to a foreign country
First known use of foreigner - 15th century
(source: Merriam-Webster Dictionary)

Obama is Constitutionally ineligible.

Gotta go handle some more professional obligations (some of us do work for a living). Have fun chasing your tail, HD!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:38 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top