Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-05-2010, 11:43 PM
 
7,541 posts, read 6,272,509 times
Reputation: 1837

Advertisements

No. plain an simple
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-05-2010, 11:45 PM
 
Location: Midwest City, Oklahoma
14,848 posts, read 8,210,859 times
Reputation: 4590
You people keep taking the debate beyond what it was intended to be.

Again, for the record, the United States had a sterilization program aimed at mental patients and violent criminals. It was not unconstitutional within its own rights, because felons have no rights under the constitution.

The reason it was repealed is because since only certain felons were sterilized, rather than all felons(such as white-collar criminals), then it was unequal. And that is what made our sterilization program unconstitutional. And the policy-makers refused to sterilize every single felon.


My question is simply, do you believe that the program as it was, had both good intentions and good results? Do you believe child molesters, rapists, murderers, and mental patients have the right to procreate?


They already don't have the right to own a gun, as well as many other restrictions.

Why is the ability to have children seen as a fundamental right? Especially seeing as the world is largely overpopulated, there are so many children in need of adoption and foster homes, and that a large swath of the public simply chooses to never have children at all.

Why is protecting a violent criminal's ability to pass on his bad genes deemed so important?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-05-2010, 11:46 PM
 
Location: southern california
61,288 posts, read 87,431,754 times
Reputation: 55562
Quote:
Originally Posted by altlover85 View Post
I don't think it's having the disabled child that is the badge of honor. It is raising the child to be the best they can be that is looked upon positively.

I don't know where you are getting this whole successful child is a bad thing from. I think most parents still hope that their child can go to the best college and get a high paying job.

Redshadowz, if it just ended with violence, I could almost agree with you, but you know that people would manipulate the policies for their own personal gain.
by the terrible harrassment that good students experience in k12. how to do i from friends who are teachers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-05-2010, 11:48 PM
 
Location: southern california
61,288 posts, read 87,431,754 times
Reputation: 55562
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redshadowz View Post
You people keep taking the debate beyond what it was intended to be.

Again, for the record, the United States had a sterilization program aimed at mental patients and violent criminals. It was not unconstitutional within its own rights, because felons have no rights under the constitution.

The reason it was repealed is because since only certain felons were sterilized, rather than all felons(such as white-collar criminals), then it was unequal.


My question is simply, do you believe that the program as it was, had both good intentions and good results? Do you believe child molesters, rapists, murderers, and mental patients have the right to procreate?


They already don't have the right to own a gun, as well as many other restrictions.

Why is the ability to have children seen as a fundamental right? Especially seeing as the world is largely overpopulated, there are so many children in need of adoption and foster homes, and that a large swath of the public simply chooses to never have children at all.

Why is protecting a violent criminal's ability to pass on his genes deemed so important?
how strange that the things we judged and sentenced & condemned the germans for at nuremberg , we now propose.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-05-2010, 11:56 PM
 
874 posts, read 1,660,021 times
Reputation: 386
Huckleberry, your school must have been different than mine. I was both disabled and a high achiever and I didn't get much crap about it. Neither did my other friends who were in advanced classes and not disabled.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-05-2010, 11:56 PM
 
Location: Midwest City, Oklahoma
14,848 posts, read 8,210,859 times
Reputation: 4590
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huckleberry3911948 View Post
how strange that the things we judged and sentenced & condemned the germans for at nuremberg , we now propose.

The Germans did things that could hardly been justified by science. Their desire to exterminate the jews seems to me to be absolutely idiotic. And btw, the Germans actually copied our eugenics program. If it wasn't for the American Eugenics program, and anti-miscegenation laws, there might not have even been a Nazi Germany.

Like I said, these are things the United States has already done in the past. These things were sanctioned by some of our greatest political leaders. Approved by the masses.

The Germans hardly were condemned for sterilizing the mentally ill, the gays, criminals, the gypsies, the jews, or the deemed genetically inferior. The Germans were condemned for exterminating people and using others as lab rats in terrible experiments.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-05-2010, 11:58 PM
 
874 posts, read 1,660,021 times
Reputation: 386
I've changed my mind. No, I don't think it's a good idea. You can't isolate a policy from outside forces. There is still slippery slope potential.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2010, 12:15 AM
 
Location: southern california
61,288 posts, read 87,431,754 times
Reputation: 55562
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redshadowz View Post
The Germans did things that could hardly been justified by science. Their desire to exterminate the jews seems to me to be absolutely idiotic. And btw, the Germans actually copied our eugenics program. If it wasn't for the American Eugenics program, and anti-miscegenation laws, there might not have even been a Nazi Germany.

Like I said, these are things the United States has already done in the past. These things were sanctioned by some of our greatest political leaders. Approved by the masses.

The Germans hardly were condemned for sterilizing the mentally ill, the gays, criminals, the gypsies, the jews, or the deemed genetically inferior. The Germans were condemned for exterminating people and using others as lab rats in terrible experiments.
the accusations against them and part of the evidence of their cruelty and unjust behavior was evidence of sterilizaton of the mentally handicapped.
this is a matter of record.
do you need links.
???
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2010, 12:25 AM
 
Location: Terra firma
1,372 posts, read 1,549,314 times
Reputation: 1122
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redshadowz View Post
You people keep taking the debate beyond what it was intended to be.

Again, for the record, the United States had a sterilization program aimed at mental patients and violent criminals. It was not unconstitutional within its own rights, because felons have no rights under the constitution.
And you keep trying to over simplify a complex issue. For your information the sterilization programs of the 1920's had their roots in Eugenics which was a very politically and racially charged movement now considered a pseudo-science. Many people (estimated at around 100,000) in places like Appalachia were sterilized simply for having below average IQ scores. There was a strong racial and class elitism component to this movement and many, myself included, see it as a dark chapter in U.S. history.

Eugenics in America: A brief History
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sourc...DDVBxw&cad=rja
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2010, 12:26 AM
 
Location: Midwest City, Oklahoma
14,848 posts, read 8,210,859 times
Reputation: 4590
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huckleberry3911948 View Post
the accusations against them and part of the evidence of their cruelty and unjust behavior was evidence of sterilizaton of the mentally handicapped.
this is a matter of record.
do you need links.
???
Actually I would love links, but really, I still agree with them. And honestly if we were complaining, we are pretty damn big hypocrites(not surprisingly), since we were doing the same thing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:40 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top