Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-10-2010, 05:22 AM
 
Location: Michigan
5,376 posts, read 5,344,175 times
Reputation: 1633

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by kingdomcome1 View Post
He clearly was "on the clock". Look at the pics again. Then again, I guess something like this doesn't really suprise me Maybe he should worry more about doing his job, then making news.....then again, maybe that was his job

He was not making news (the person trying to report it was trying to make news out of nothing - like Andrew B having someone to throw eggs so he could report it) in his questions or personal filming. No foul. No story. No outrage.

The only confrontation i see is in the article writers words, not the pictures. He asked questions. Took pictures. Is that now a crime?

One of the biggest laughs we (in the media) get is the assumption that if you work for one network your liberal or another your conservative. 99.9% of us do our job. Period. No matter who we work for.

Last edited by plannine; 09-10-2010 at 05:33 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-10-2010, 06:15 AM
 
8,652 posts, read 17,234,865 times
Reputation: 4622
Quote:
Originally Posted by charolastra00 View Post
It doesn't appear that he was an actual reporter- probably more of a cameraman or producer. If he was doing things on his own time separate from ABC then what is the problem?
From the link.....

"In my opinion, the ABC employee’s role at the rally was to provoke a confrontation with participants so ABC News cameras could record it and then use the footage; literally, making news."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2010, 06:18 AM
 
8,652 posts, read 17,234,865 times
Reputation: 4622
Quote:
Originally Posted by charolastra00 View Post
So a freelance audio tech working a contract job for ABC interviewing people with inflammatory statements on his personal video camera is unethical?

Interesting...
Yes......
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2010, 06:25 AM
 
8,652 posts, read 17,234,865 times
Reputation: 4622
Quote:
Originally Posted by plannine View Post
He was not making news (the person trying to report it was trying to make news out of nothing - like Andrew B having someone to throw eggs so he could report it) in his questions or personal filming. No foul. No story. No outrage.

The only confrontation i see is in the article writers words, not the pictures. He asked questions. Took pictures. Is that now a crime?

One of the biggest laughs we (in the media) get is the assumption that if you work for one network your liberal or another your conservative. 99.9% of us do our job. Period. No matter who we work for.
If you are saying it's not true then the media needs to work on that "assumption" we have out here...I'd say the "assumption" has been well earned by the media... Just take a good look at the anchors at the networks.....NBC, CBS and ABC have a very liberal agenda......
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2010, 06:35 AM
 
Location: Tennessee
37,794 posts, read 40,990,020 times
Reputation: 62169
Here are ABC NATIONAL male anchors and male correspondents. I don't see that guy's photo here. Do you?

ABC News Anchors and Correspondents (National) - Male

Maybe he's a local.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2010, 06:39 AM
 
Location: South Fla
9,644 posts, read 9,842,040 times
Reputation: 1942
Quote:
Originally Posted by Langlen View Post
Still don't see the problem.

ABC newsperson or not.

There's no such thing as decent news media when it comes to American news, so yes, he does have every right to get confrontational.
So guess you dont want one with comments like that. Complain there isnt something yet make excuses for it not happening. Makes no sense
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2010, 07:40 AM
 
Location: OCEAN BREEZES AND VIEWS SAN CLEMENTE
19,893 posts, read 18,436,651 times
Reputation: 6465
Abc CBS NBC think we know what they are all about. Report the news, that is it, nothing more nothing less. Hmmmmmmmmmm Obama administration and our Media, what do they have in common? The job is to report the news only, not make the news!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2010, 10:00 AM
 
Location: Dorchester
2,605 posts, read 4,841,719 times
Reputation: 1090
Quote:
Originally Posted by charolastra00 View Post
So a freelance audio tech working a contract job for ABC interviewing people with inflammatory statements on his personal video camera is unethical?

Interesting...
Maybe you should ask yourself why he wasn't forthcoming about his identity?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2010, 10:08 AM
 
Location: Dorchester
2,605 posts, read 4,841,719 times
Reputation: 1090
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pandamonium View Post
Veit aknowledges that he lost his cool because the responses were off the beam. He was contracted and got reprimanded by ABC. With that reprimand, ABC accepted responsibility for those actions to an extent.

It truly is no more and no less.

We aren't talking about premeditation. The guy lost his temper. The rest is the need for a bunch of people to feel like victims.
If it weren't premeditated then why was it that the person documenting the scene had to do a bit of detective work to find out who this guy was.

This is nothing more than lefties making excuses for inexcusable behavior and then trying to make the people, who are shocked by this incident, feel small. Par for the course
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2010, 10:11 AM
 
Location: Dorchester
2,605 posts, read 4,841,719 times
Reputation: 1090
Quote:
Originally Posted by plannine View Post
He was not making news (the person trying to report it was trying to make news out of nothing - like Andrew B having someone to throw eggs so he could report it) in his questions or personal filming. No foul. No story. No outrage.

The only confrontation i see is in the article writers words, not the pictures. He asked questions. Took pictures. Is that now a crime?

One of the biggest laughs we (in the media) get is the assumption that if you work for one network your liberal or another your conservative. 99.9% of us do our job. Period. No matter who we work for.

Yeah right!


Last edited by TomDot; 09-10-2010 at 10:19 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:58 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top