Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 09-16-2010, 10:45 AM
 
29,981 posts, read 42,926,416 times
Reputation: 12828

Advertisements

If a tax policy has been in place for 10 years is then not extending that policy but rather raising taxes exactly that: raising taxes?

Why after 10 years would a policy in place for a decade be considered "extending cuts" rather than "raising taxes" if the objective is to raise taxes.

Is this just rhetoric from the left to continue the finger pointing at former President GW Bush?

Is this just more rhetoric to make Obama look as though he is not breaking another promise?

Is a tax hike not a tax hike when the left can spin the rhetoric into something else instead?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-16-2010, 10:47 AM
 
6,484 posts, read 6,615,778 times
Reputation: 1275
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifelongMOgal View Post
If a tax policy has been in place for 10 years is then not extending that policy but rather raising taxes exactly that: raising taxes?

Why after 10 years would a policy in place for a decade be considered "extending cuts" rather than "raising taxes" if the objective is to raise taxes.

Is this just rhetoric from the left to continue the finger pointing at former President GW Bush?

Is this just more rhetoric to make Obama look as though he is not breaking another promise?

Is a tax hike not a tax hike when the left can spin the rhetoric into something else instead?
Probably the same way a "commuter fee" can be implemented by the city I work in. I live just outside the city limits but drive into the city. They won't call it a "tax"...but they still charge it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2010, 10:57 AM
 
Location: Don't be a cry baby!
1,309 posts, read 1,362,320 times
Reputation: 617
It really depends on which political party’s loud mouth is spewing the lies.
A tax break is a play of words to get undereducated people to feel they are getting a goodie when in fact they are being played like a fiddle.
You/we are either getting taxed are we aren’t; we are either getting taxed more or less. If you feel like our lawmakers are doing you a favor it’s because they expect one in return, to them we are fools. (and a large portion are!)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2010, 11:06 AM
 
48,502 posts, read 96,838,702 times
Reputation: 18304
It politcal terms its when you can do it indirect to those who will pay the ultimate cost don't realise it. You raise fees on business then they either raise cost of what they produce or eliminate cost and labor is 70-75% of cost.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2010, 11:08 AM
 
31,387 posts, read 37,040,586 times
Reputation: 15038
When a sale at a store is over, was the price raised or is the sale just over?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2010, 11:10 AM
 
29,981 posts, read 42,926,416 times
Reputation: 12828
Quote:
Originally Posted by ovcatto View Post
When a sale at a store is over, was the price raised or is the sale just over?
If prices have been in place consistently for a decade it is not a "sale".

However, your post does FAIL!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2010, 11:32 AM
 
Location: Imaginary Figment
11,449 posts, read 14,464,213 times
Reputation: 4777
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifelongMOgal View Post
If a tax policy has been in place for 10 years is then not extending that policy but rather raising taxes exactly that: raising taxes?

Why after 10 years would a policy in place for a decade be considered "extending cuts" rather than "raising taxes" if the objective is to raise taxes.

Is this just rhetoric from the left to continue the finger pointing at former President GW Bush?

Is this just more rhetoric to make Obama look as though he is not breaking another promise?

Is a tax hike not a tax hike when the left can spin the rhetoric into something else instead?
He never said he wouldn't "raise" it on that particular group. So your premise is flawed to begin with.

The tax rate would return to how it was under Clinton, Daddy Bush and Reagan. A couple of points isn't the end of the world. You've got to hand it to the GOP propaganda machine. No where else in the world would the middle class to the proletariat march in the street to protest the upper echelon's tax increase. I don't think you'll ever realize how absurdly funny you guys all appear. Not to mention talking out of both sides of your mouth (ie we must pay down this deficit/we must not allow the tax cuts to expire.)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2010, 11:42 AM
 
Location: Southeast
4,301 posts, read 7,032,932 times
Reputation: 1464
If the left wing can call cancellation of a scheduled tax cut before it takes effect a "massive tax increase" then for the sake of fairness the expiring Bush cuts can most certainly be called a tax hike.

Given that the Bush tax cuts are nearly a decade old, they have become the norm. In fact, the rate set by the "tax cuts" have actually been in effect longer than the rates they were originally cutting.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2010, 11:42 AM
 
29,981 posts, read 42,926,416 times
Reputation: 12828
Quote:
Originally Posted by SLCPUNK View Post
He never said he wouldn't "raise" it on that particular group. So your premise is flawed to begin with.

The tax rate would return to how it was under Clinton, Daddy Bush and Reagan. A couple of points isn't the end of the world. You've got to hand it to the GOP propaganda machine. No where else in the world would the middle class to the proletariat march in the street to protest the upper echelon's tax increase. I don't think you'll ever realize how absurdly funny you guys all appear. Not to mention talking out of both sides of your mouth (ie we must pay down this deficit/we must not allow the tax cuts to expire.)
What particular group? The American taxpayer?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2010, 11:57 AM
 
Location: Long Island (chief in S Farmingdale)
22,184 posts, read 19,457,116 times
Reputation: 5302
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifelongMOgal View Post
What particular group? The American taxpayer?
Those making over $250,000, which actually winds up being closer to those making $300,000 or more once you take into consideration the extended 28% bracket, the AMT patch, property tax, mortgage interest deductions, etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top