Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-21-2010, 08:43 AM
 
25,157 posts, read 53,947,295 times
Reputation: 7058

Advertisements

Being Jewish and left handed are not the norm. Are they disordered too?

Obesity, slothfulness, and stuffing one's face full of fried high calorie foods is normal. Is that wonderful? Should we all do that?

Quote:
Originally Posted by wdavid002 View Post
Homosexuality is not the "norm"..so it is not in order with most of the population..therefore a "disorder". Anyone who tries to argue differently is being dishonest. Doesn't mean that it should not exist..just is not the normal order of things...don't know why it is even necessary to type this stuff...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-21-2010, 08:47 AM
 
8,624 posts, read 9,088,985 times
Reputation: 2863
Quote:
Originally Posted by John1960 View Post
WILMINGTON, Del., Sept. 20 (UPI) -- Christine O'Donnell, Delaware's Republican U.S. Senate nominee, said in an interview four years ago homosexuality is "an identity disorder."

Newly revealed comments from 2006 indicate O'Donnell once believed gays and lesbians have an "identity disorder," putting her squarely at odds with the American medical and psychological community, and popular opinion, ABC News reported Monday.

O'Donnell: Homosexuality a disorder - UPI.com

You must remember that Christine O'Donnell has not been paid off or pressured by radical gays organizations to reclassify the cause of homosexuality.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-21-2010, 08:47 AM
 
3,153 posts, read 3,594,130 times
Reputation: 1080
Quote:
Originally Posted by artsyguy View Post
Being Jewish and left handed are not the norm. Are they disordered too?

Obesity, slothfulness, and stuffing one's face full of fried high calorie foods is normal. Is that wonderful? Should we all do that?
Stop babbling..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-21-2010, 08:49 AM
 
Location: North Cackelacky....in the hills.
19,567 posts, read 21,870,208 times
Reputation: 2519
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neuling View Post
When a potentially leading politician has controversial views on minorities, that is more problematic than when your neighbor has such views. After all politicians are supposed to be our representatives.
She is running for a Senator's seat,NOT the President.

Obama doesn't believe in gay marriage,I guess people should not have voted for him then...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-21-2010, 08:51 AM
 
Location: North Cackelacky....in the hills.
19,567 posts, read 21,870,208 times
Reputation: 2519
Quote:
Originally Posted by artsyguy View Post
Being Jewish and left handed are not the norm. Are they disordered too?
You choose to be Jewish...

As to being left handed,it IS abnormal isn't it?
You yourself just stated so in the above post...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-21-2010, 08:57 AM
 
Location: Dorchester
2,605 posts, read 4,843,904 times
Reputation: 1090
Quote:
Originally Posted by padcrasher View Post
The Tea Party wouldn't be the Tea Party without bashing scientists, Professors, knowledgable experts, etc.

This is a cult, an anti-intellectual cult.

Having a degree of higher learning is a bad thing!
The libs just love to toss around this completely unfounded anti-intellectual thing don't they. Do you realize that, BY FAR, the worst critics professors, scientists, and "knowledgeable experts" face are their peers?!!! Do you really think they worry about the effing Tea Party?

Additionally, for every 1 successful scientific breakthrough there are literally thousands of abject scientific failures, many resulting in disastrous consequences. Given this, don't you think that keeping an eye on our scientific community might be a little prudent?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-21-2010, 08:59 AM
 
Location: West Coast of Europe
25,947 posts, read 24,745,361 times
Reputation: 9728
Quote:
Originally Posted by oz in SC View Post
She is running for a Senator's seat,NOT the President.

Obama doesn't believe in gay marriage,I guess people should not have voted for him then...
While a senator ranks below the president, he or she still is an important representative of the people in my view.

Not believing in (what does that mean anyway?) gay marriage is not the same as calling homosexuality a mental disorder.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-21-2010, 09:02 AM
 
Location: North Cackelacky....in the hills.
19,567 posts, read 21,870,208 times
Reputation: 2519
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neuling View Post
While a senator ranks below the president, he or she still is an important representative of the people in my view.

Not believing in (what does that mean anyway?) gay marriage is not the same as calling homosexuality a mental disorder.
But Obama could possibly be in a position to allow gay marriage,his objection to it has some bearing.

O'Donnell would be one of one hundred and should be representative of the people who elected her...so if she is elected they would know what she thinks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-21-2010, 09:04 AM
 
10,854 posts, read 9,301,747 times
Reputation: 3122
Quote:
Originally Posted by tvdxer View Post
I don't think it's so much an identity disorder as a moral disorder (an inclination to an immoral act). A considerable percentage of people DO feel an attraction for the same sex, and this is not a sin in itself. However, sodomy is a grave sin, and any inclination to that sin can be said to be a moral disorder. It's like pedophilia in that sense; pedophiles cannot easily remove their attraction to children, but they can refrain from sexual activity with them.

Whose morals are we talking about?

I could easily classify racism as moral disorder and yet exists and in certain social environments endorsed, and even encouraged.

Pedophilia can be classified as immoral because it is obviously harmful to the healthy development of a child and a child is sexually violated without being aware of the implications of what is happening.

Can you explain to me how two consenting adults that engage in a voluntary sexual activity is immoral. Exactly who does it harm?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-21-2010, 09:05 AM
 
10,854 posts, read 9,301,747 times
Reputation: 3122
Quote:
Originally Posted by padcrasher View Post
The Tea Party wouldn't be the Tea Party without bashing scientists, Professors, knowledgable experts, etc.

This is a cult, an anti-intellectual cult.

Having a degree of higher learning is a bad thing!
They are the Know Nothing Party of the 21st century!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:56 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top