Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-27-2010, 09:12 AM
 
2,564 posts, read 1,596,343 times
Reputation: 347

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Melvin.George View Post
One thing I've learned during my 76 years...if you don't try you don't have a chance. I'll keep on speaking up against the NEW Republican party who quadrupled the national debt under Reagan/Bush41 then after it was strightened out doubled it again under George W. Bush. That's the only real insanity I've seen....
How many times is GOP going to keep playing its "clever" name game...the ONLY thing that really changes in the Republican Party
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-27-2010, 10:10 AM
 
2,958 posts, read 2,560,575 times
Reputation: 584
Quote:
Originally Posted by Backspace View Post
Melvin, our current spender in chief will go down as the biggest debt creating president ever. He's spent more in his short time in office than any other president ever came close to and we have very little if anything to show for it. It's amazing how progressives love to live in the past, maybe it's because they can't handle talking about the current and know that they're not going to play much of a part in the future.

If Regan or either Bush were in office right now you would have a leg to stand on but today's spending is 100% progressive democrat. Remember, conservatives like myself are the party of NO.
Can't you read? The man assumed an $11 trillion debt from George Bush and before he ever spent a cent he owed nearly half a trillion dollars just to cover the first year's interest payment. Reagan/Bush41 and George W. Bush borrowed 80% of all the debt this nation had accumulated in it's 232 year history. If you want to talk debt you're either ignorant or something besides a Republican.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-27-2010, 04:08 PM
 
Location: Illinois Delta
5,767 posts, read 5,015,185 times
Reputation: 2063
Quote:
Originally Posted by Melvin.George View Post
Can't you read? The man assumed an $11 trillion debt from George Bush and before he ever spent a cent he owed nearly half a trillion dollars just to cover the first year's interest payment. Reagan/Bush41 and George W. Bush borrowed 80% of all the debt this nation had accumulated in it's 232 year history. If you want to talk debt you're either ignorant or something besides a Republican.

Interesting how some people freak out when they're confronted with the truth. Apparently, like Rip Van Winkle, they slept for eight years and woke up to see that they'd been booted out of office, and quite handily at that.
The fact that President Obama has managed to prevent a full-blown crash with Wall Street and the GOP doing nothing to help is amazing.How odd that people want to complain about money spent on Afghanistan, where the Taliban is, but had no problem with the trillions spent in Iraq, just because Hussein was a "bad guy." Not that he wasn't, but surely the money could have been better spent going after bin Laden.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-27-2010, 04:28 PM
 
2,958 posts, read 2,560,575 times
Reputation: 584
Quote:
Originally Posted by Evenstar51 View Post
Interesting how some people freak out when they're confronted with the truth. Apparently, like Rip Van Winkle, they slept for eight years and woke up to see that they'd been booted out of office, and quite handily at that.
The fact that President Obama has managed to prevent a full-blown crash with Wall Street and the GOP doing nothing to help is amazing.How odd that people want to complain about money spent on Afghanistan, where the Taliban is, but had no problem with the trillions spent in Iraq, just because Hussein was a "bad guy." Not that he wasn't, but surely the money could have been better spent going after bin Laden.
Not to mention the 4000+ young Americans and their families whose lives were lost or devastated by the military/industrial complex. An estimated 150,000 innocent Iraqis lost their lives and after the suicide bombings began more than 2,000,000 fled their homes and looked for refuge in Jordan and Syria. We've had our a$$es in the middle east for nothing but oil interests since the 1930's.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:30 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top