Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I don't think I would trust any administration with this as administrations do change and the abuse could happen. Difference between your boy Obama and Bush is that Bush wanted to wiretap known or suspected terrorists and this clod you support wants to wiretap YOU>
I know, isn't that just hilarious?! They were howling at the moon about what Bush did, but seem to like this violation just fine.
Amazing. It was such a PROBLEM when Bush wanted to wire tap know or suspected terrorists and we could not possibly violate their rights to privacy. But let this intrusive SOG decide to monitor your cell phone and email and it is just peachy. I am telling you liberals, you do not know what freedom you have until it is taken away right under your noses.
Liberals are all about CONTROL...of course unless it infringes upon killing babies in the womb or gay marriage. They have no use for the 4th Amendment; well, again except Obama who refuses to release most of his personal documents for public transparency.
“We’re talking about lawfully authorized intercepts,” said Valerie E. Caproni, general counsel for the Federal Bureau of Investigation. “We’re not talking expanding authority. We’re talking about preserving our ability to execute our existing authority in order to protect the public safety and national security.”
Comparing this to what Bush did is apples and oranges.
I don't think I would trust any administration with this as administrations do change and the abuse could happen. Difference between your boy Obama and Bush is that Bush wanted to wiretap known or suspected terrorists and this clod you support wants to wiretap YOU>
“We’re talking about lawfully authorized intercepts,” said Valerie E. Caproni, general counsel for the Federal Bureau of Investigation. “We’re not talking expanding authority. We’re talking about preserving our ability to execute our existing authority in order to protect the public safety and national security.”
Comparing this to what Bush did is apples and oranges.
intressting.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
