Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-03-2010, 03:08 PM
 
5,715 posts, read 15,046,738 times
Reputation: 2949

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by AnUnidentifiedMale View Post
It's not that simple. If the bakery refused to serve them based on the fact that the order was from gay people, the bakery may have violated the law.

Imagine if a white-owned bakery refused to fill an order for a black student group, or if a conservative Christian owner refused an order for a Jewish group.
Are gays a protected group under the law?

This wasn't exactly a hate crime...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-03-2010, 03:12 PM
 
Location: FL
1,138 posts, read 3,347,725 times
Reputation: 792
Is'nt this similar to the comment Rand Paul was attempting to answer when asked about the civil rights act, meaning that store owners should have a right to eliminate anyone from their establishment as it is their business? Rand Paul: Civil Rights Act brouhaha clouds Senate campaign - CSMonitor.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2010, 03:15 PM
 
Location: California
11,466 posts, read 19,353,683 times
Reputation: 12713
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnUnidentifiedMale View Post
All of the news stories say that the order was initially refused because the owner didn't think it was appropriate to make rainbow cupcakes because he was against the "gay lifestyle". He later changed his story and said that he didn't have enough colors to fill the order.

The City of Indianapolis is investigating it, but in the meantime, a local radio station has announced the "1st Annual Gay Cupcake Party".

Gay Lesbian Rights: City responds to complaints about bakery not serving gay customer - fox59.com
Well I just think it's never fair unless we get the whole story, too many times we only get what the accuser says and then conclusions are made and the damage is done.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2010, 03:22 PM
 
5,715 posts, read 15,046,738 times
Reputation: 2949
Default Maybe he should have offered to make plain cupcakes instead....

I don't think they were asked to leave the business.

I don't get the impression that the man was disrespectful to them.

He just didn't want to make the cupcakes.

Now, it seems that they want to destroy his business.

Last edited by World Citizen; 10-03-2010 at 03:33 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2010, 03:39 PM
 
1,629 posts, read 2,629,773 times
Reputation: 3510
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roaddog View Post
Actually that is a fair question, did the cookie shop refuse because the cupcakes were rainbow or was there another reason? 100% fair question.
The baker didn't want to make the cupcakes. If the group did not reveal the symbolism behind the cupcakes, the baker would have made them.

Again, I am wondering how the baker found out they were gay.

Quote:
Originally Posted by AnUnidentifiedMale View Post
It's not that simple. If the bakery refused to serve them based on the fact that the order was from gay people, the bakery may have violated the law.

Imagine if a white-owned bakery refused to fill an order for a black student group, or if a conservative Christian owner refused an order for a Jewish group.
No laws were violated. The baker did not refuse to serve them, he refused to make rainbow cupcakes. A store owner refusing to make something that you ask them to make is not prosecutable discrimination. It's really not that difficult to understand.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2010, 03:58 PM
 
26,680 posts, read 28,674,422 times
Reputation: 7943
Quote:
Originally Posted by World Citizen View Post
Are gays a protected group under the law?
Yes, in Marion County, Indiana, sexual orientation is a protected category.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2010, 04:02 PM
 
26,680 posts, read 28,674,422 times
Reputation: 7943
Quote:
Originally Posted by new2colo View Post
No laws were violated. The baker did not refuse to serve them, he refused to make rainbow cupcakes. A store owner refusing to make something that you ask them to make is not prosecutable discrimination. It's really not that difficult to understand.
I wouldn't jump to conclusions about this. True, it's not a violation of the law to merely refuse an order, but if the refusal was based on the customer's sexual orientation, then it is a violation of the law in Marion County, Indiana.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2010, 04:08 PM
 
13,053 posts, read 12,953,537 times
Reputation: 2618
Yes, the bakery has the right to refuse anyone for any reason they choose (note I even disagree with the mandates that try to insist the protected clauses should allow such). Let business take care of itself though the opinions of the individuals who attend it. We can not legislate opinion, for to do so makes us no better than those we accuse.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2010, 04:10 PM
 
26,680 posts, read 28,674,422 times
Reputation: 7943
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nomander View Post
Yes, the bakery has the right to refuse anyone for any reason they choose.
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 says otherwise.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2010, 05:28 PM
 
1,629 posts, read 2,629,773 times
Reputation: 3510
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnUnidentifiedMale View Post
I wouldn't jump to conclusions about this. True, it's not a violation of the law to merely refuse an order, but if the refusal was based on the customer's sexual orientation, then it is a violation of the law in Marion County, Indiana.
There is no way that the baker refused an order because of this group's sexuality. How, again, could the baker have known these people were homosexuals unless the group made it apparent? Why did the group feel the need to let the baker know who they prefer to sleep with at night?

This could have all been avoided had the group just ordered what they wanted and said nothing more.

Quote:
Originally Posted by AnUnidentifiedMale View Post
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 says otherwise.
A private business has the right to refuse service to anyone. The Civil Rights Act only protects you if you can prove that your refusal of service was because you fall into one of the protected classes under the Act.

I want to see how this group is going to prove they were kicked out of the store because of their sexual orientation. They were denied rainbow colored cupcakes because of the connotation the cupcakes carry with them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:26 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top