Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-07-2010, 12:59 PM
 
6,762 posts, read 11,630,098 times
Reputation: 3028

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by AnUnidentifiedMale View Post
How about if someone is too poor to pay the fee, or is in the hospital for an extended period of time when the due date comes? Would you still support letting his house burn down?
I already stated that from everything that has been said, the man could afford the $75 and chose not to.

In the case of the poor, maybe the county should figure out how to help them afford it. Maybe some way of qualifying residents who can't afford it and figuring out a way to create a fund to help them out.

Do you understand that the city that is offering the coverage is offering it to people who are outside the city? That means they do not pay city taxes. The only way for a small town fire dept to be able to afford to expand its coverage is to increase revenue. That is why they only cover those who pay the rather tiny $75 fee. They have limited resources, limited man power, and limited equipment. If they are out fighting a fire in rural areas, they are leaving the people in the town exposed to a higher risk if they have a fire. They simply cannot run around putting out rural fires and leave the city at a higher risk for free.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-07-2010, 01:02 PM
 
Location: Va. Beach
6,391 posts, read 5,167,094 times
Reputation: 2283
Default Let me explain,

Quote:
Originally Posted by proudvoterofObama View Post
Aren't lifeguards volunteers? As are *most* firefighters - especially in small towns. I'm still not sure why they had a $75 fee anyway. I've never heard of such a thing. I hope my house doesn't catch on fire or the regulations of OKC differ b/c I would be royally screwed. I have renter's insurance, but have never paid anything to a fire dept.
Since you are incapable of researching before opining.

1. He lives in a municipality without a fire station.

2. His municipality has an agreement with 8 surrounding municipalities that requires a 75$ fee.

3. He plays no taxes for fire fighting support.

4. Even volunteer fire departments have a certain range on which they will respond to. A lifeguard for a pool, cannot leave the pool, and run over to the ocean 10 miles down the rd, in response to a problem with a swimmer in the ocean.

5. If you had the same arrangement where you lived, you would know because you would have been contacted in 1 way or another.

6. Because you rent, your renter's insurance covers your belongings, the responsibility for insurance on the building is the owner of the property itself.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-07-2010, 01:13 PM
 
2,414 posts, read 5,400,759 times
Reputation: 654
Sound's like homeowner was trying to set up an insurance scam. Don't pay the $75, set trash on fire and then collect the insurance money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-07-2010, 01:15 PM
 
26,680 posts, read 28,667,610 times
Reputation: 7943
I'm just glad that most of America doesn't operate this way. It's not the kind of country I would want to live in.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-07-2010, 01:22 PM
 
Location: Chicago
38,707 posts, read 103,185,348 times
Reputation: 29983
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnUnidentifiedMale View Post
I'm just glad that most of America doesn't operate this way. It's not the kind of country I would want to live in.
And you don't have to. In a country of 300 million people, you have numerous choices about where to live and what type of services are provided. His choice was to live in a rural area with minimal services. Many people make the same choice because they believe the benefits outweigh the risks. So let them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-07-2010, 01:33 PM
 
11,944 posts, read 14,782,788 times
Reputation: 2772
Quote:
Originally Posted by kentuckydad95 View Post
You can't, but WHY is this area pretty unique? A subscription fee is NOT the norm in most places. Most rural places have volunteer FD's. Why doesn't the place in question? It's the key question. Do they make more money off of the subscription fee then they would a tax? Something smells wrong with their entire system. Smells like corruption.
It is unique in that rural communities are less able to provide funds for large projects or objectives without becoming oppressive with taxes. Same with school systems leaning heavily on property taxes to provide funding. That's great for a wealthy neighborhood but economic injustice perpetuates itself in places like appalaichia and lower incomes states like Louisianna or Arkansas.

Every attempt wealthier states have made to inject cash into these lesser states to give a hand up seems to get gobbled up by administers pocketing for themselves. Rural pick themselves up by the bootstraps folks, hats off to you, but are you really willing to sit idly by watching the standard of education scrape the bottom ensuring a perpetual cycle of lower standards of living and education for your children? The arguments of states rights to self determine have notoriously been used by thieves robbing the poor of any meaningful help the wealthier states have offered. Too many have been fed the hearsay that city folks hate country folks or treat them with disrespect as if they're inferior human beings. What are any of us supposed to do about that?
Quote:
Originally Posted by kentuckydad95 View Post
Oh and I also found out that their county commission meetings are held on Monday mornings at 9 AM!!! Now if that doesn't stink of corruption, I dunno what does. They want absolutely no one to have a say.
My home state of NY usually called open forum town meetings that were highly debatable/ contentious in evening sessions that would allow the majority to attend. Perhaps this meeting was intended for leadership to consider all sides of issue from leadership perspective first?
Quote:
Originally Posted by AONE View Post
They disgraced themselves on this one. Personally I'd rather have firefighters that had the ability to make better choices... I wonder how safe this community feels?
Yuppers. From a real estate valuation perspective it perpetuates deflated soft market of their home values. I don't want to live there and quite a few of your customers would agree with me. So what are the rest of us supposed to do for south fulton TN if they insist they prefer this method, yet out of the other sides of their mouths claim the rest of their countrymen from other states hates them?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nomander View Post
Is this issue one where human life was an issue and they denied? Maybe you could provide us with the contracts to which allows such private agencies to stand by idle when human life is an issue?
I'm glad Peta is involved if animals are involved. I hope they sue the homeowner if his negligence caused the death of these <alleged> animals. Animals are a responsibility as is home ownership and this man burdening his community and neglecting the safety of his pets shouldn't be given free pass just because too many of you only value the life of humans and diminish the lives of animals as worthless. That mentality only feeds sociopaths an entitlement to abuse and neglect animals with social and legal consent. Respect the lives of animals or have none.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-07-2010, 01:49 PM
 
Location: NC
9,984 posts, read 10,391,755 times
Reputation: 3086
The fire fighters made the right decision.

1. He did not pay the fee so why is he entitled to the service?
2. If the firefighters had gone on to the property they could have been held liable for a variety of things in a variety of circumstances.
3. If they saved his house what would prevent everyone else from just deciding to free ride the FD.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-07-2010, 01:50 PM
 
Location: Illinois Delta
5,767 posts, read 5,014,662 times
Reputation: 2063
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohKnip View Post
This clip doesn't say anything about him offering 500 dollars right there on the spot. It does however have a good interview from the fire chief who explains the situation to those who can't stay level headed.

And I specifically said that it wasn't the same clip I'd seen on the news. Call KPSD in Paducah and ask for the clip; what they choose to put on their website isn't up to me. You have the official explaining their lack of compassion; be happy with that. May you never have such a tragedy happen to you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-07-2010, 01:55 PM
 
9,803 posts, read 16,190,154 times
Reputation: 8266
-----trajedy---

??????????

Starting a yard fire he couldn't control
Refusing to pay the yearly $75 fee
raising a stupid son who resorts to violence


If it's a trajedy, it certainly is one that easily could have been prevented.

I wonder if his parents were related.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-07-2010, 02:03 PM
 
Location: Ohio
24,621 posts, read 19,163,062 times
Reputation: 21738
Quote:
Originally Posted by MissDollie View Post
The homeowner placed a $75.00 bet and he lost. See the 8th paragraph. He was certain even if he did not pay, if there was a fire, he would still get service. He gave thought to his decision to not pay.

Hope he did not extend that bet to the fire insurance on the home and contents.

Sometime the consequences of our decisions can be terrible.
Excellent point.

I have always advocated a user pay system, especially at the city and county levels of government, and since this is the 21st Century and everything is computerized people should be able to apportion their taxes as they see fit.

If people don't want to pay for fire or police services, they shouldn't have to, and shouldn't be forced to do so, but then they can't complain when they need those services and they are unavailable.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:22 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top