Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
During sentencing, he went into rants about how killing americans was the right thing to do. The judge at one point asked him if he swore allegiance to the USA at his naturalization ceremony, and he responded yes, but said he didn't mean it...
During sentencing, he went into rants about how killing americans was the right thing to do. The judge at one point asked him if he swore allegiance to the USA at his naturalization ceremony, and he responded yes, but said he didn't mean it...
Lying during his naturalization ceremony as a soldier of allah so he could kill infidels on US soil is enough reason to take Geert Wilders seriously when he suggests putting a halt to any immigration from Muslim countries, period, regardless of the professed religous or political ideology of the person seeking entry into the US or other Western countries. Political Islam and Western civilization simply do not mix.
Problem is, did we grant citizenship to more people who "didn't mean it"?
I think this answer is obvious given Dearbornistan MI and the radical Somalis in MN. Ever watch the pro-Sharia/Pro-Islam parade footage from Islam Day in NYC?
Yes, we need comprehensive immigration reform alright, it needs to be made more restrictive.
I think this answer is obvious given Dearbornistan MI and the radical Somalis in MN. Ever watch the pro-Sharia/Pro-Islam parade footage from Islam Day in NYC?
Yes, we need comprehensive immigration reform alright, it needs to be made more restrictive.
If you have ever been present at a naturalization ceremony - and I have - you will know that it is a huge deal for the people going through it ... akin to reaching the promised land.
Because one person reneged on their oath does not make the whole process bad. Candidates for naturalization go through a pretty intense screening process. Okay, so they got one wrong. But what about the thousands of others they got right and who are actively contributing to our democracy.
If you have ever been present at a naturalization ceremony - and I have - you will know that it is a huge deal for the people going through it ... akin to reaching the promised land.
Because one person reneged on their oath does not make the whole process bad. Candidates for naturalization go through a pretty intense screening process. Okay, so they got one wrong. But what about the thousands of others they got right and who are actively contributing to our democracy.
Where do you think it's more likely for a naturalization to go wrong and lead to terrorism? An immigrant from Denmark, or an immigrant from Pakistan?
If you have ever been present at a naturalization ceremony - and I have - you will know that it is a huge deal for the people going through it ... akin to reaching the promised land.
Because one person reneged on their oath does not make the whole process bad. Candidates for naturalization go through a pretty intense screening process. Okay, so they got one wrong. But what about the thousands of others they got right and who are actively contributing to our democracy.
I think that until moderate followers of Islam reign in their violent radical factions that are murdering and terrorizing worldwide that the risk is no longer one worth taking. We are, IMO, in a fight for the survival of Western civilization.
I did not suggest halting all immigration, just agreeing with Wilders on his theory of halting immigration of those who are citizens of predominantly Muslim countries, regardless of their personal religion/ideology.
Fact is we have plenty of homegrown radical Islamic terrorism here now and there is no need to continue to leave the door open any longer. Doing the same thing will only procure the same results when it comes to Islamic immigration and the probability of radicalization in mosques and madrassas here, IMO. YMMV
Denial kills. Luckily the Islamic jihadist Times Square Bomber was not so lucky and suffered an impotent detonation. This time another mass murder was avoided due to the incompetance of the jihadist, not because Napalitano's DHS or the US immigration/naturalization "system worked".
Terrorism will continue on US soil. We can reduce the likelyhood and frequency in the long-term ahead by blocking immigration from some countries to the US.
Where do you think it's more likely for a naturalization to go wrong and lead to terrorism? An immigrant from Denmark, or an immigrant from Pakistan?
Is terrorism the sum total of all possible violent crimes? I think not. So while you are stressing over what some immigrant Islamic nut case is doing you just let another 100 nut cases from another part of the world. Brilliant. I feel safer already.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
