Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-08-2010, 10:52 AM
 
35,016 posts, read 39,172,024 times
Reputation: 6195

Advertisements

"Do you remember how Texas showed that conservative policies work — it was weathering the slump just fine, it had a balanced budget, and so on?"

Texas Two-Step - NYTimes.com

"Texas was spared the worst of the housing crisis, thanks to unusually strict regulation": The Lone Star Secret | The Big Money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-08-2010, 10:55 AM
 
6,484 posts, read 6,620,504 times
Reputation: 1275
Nothing wrong with regulation if it's needed and it's good. It's when we see the gov't encouraging lending to people that don't qualify that we have problems.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-08-2010, 10:57 AM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
20,054 posts, read 18,293,964 times
Reputation: 3826
Yes, because California has very few regulations and as a result, their real estate market is just peachy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-08-2010, 11:02 AM
 
Location: In a Galaxy far, far away called Germany
4,301 posts, read 4,411,375 times
Reputation: 2394
Quote:
Originally Posted by delusianne View Post
"Do you remember how Texas showed that conservative policies work — it was weathering the slump just fine, it had a balanced budget, and so on?"

Texas Two-Step - NYTimes.com

"Texas was spared the worst of the housing crisis, thanks to unusually strict regulation": The Lone Star Secret | The Big Money.
Strict regulation doesn't equate to anti-conservatism. Conservative lending practices is what keeps banks healthy. It was liberal lending practices that hurt the banking community. If you don't have the credit to get a loan - you simply shouldn't get one. Liberals cried foul and now our banking & housing began a fall that we haven't been able to get out of. This is NOT to say that it is all their fault. Our so-called "Conservatives" (really just wolves in sheep's clothing) helped this landslide along by putting us in tremendous debt themselves.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-08-2010, 11:08 AM
 
Location: Tampa Florida
22,229 posts, read 17,865,913 times
Reputation: 4585
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calvinist View Post
Nothing wrong with regulation if it's needed and it's good. It's when we see the gov't encouraging lending to people that don't qualify that we have problems.
I think they call it "Convenient Conservatism". Basically, if we do it, it's OK.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-08-2010, 11:10 AM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
20,054 posts, read 18,293,964 times
Reputation: 3826
Awwww...some rednecks couldn't afford a house and the banks didn't want to give them the money. Interesting that progressives are pointing this out as if it's a bad thing. Of course, they're probably puzzled because they believe it's OWED to them and that banks should be forced to give them free money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-08-2010, 11:11 AM
 
Location: Londonderry, NH
41,479 posts, read 59,811,485 times
Reputation: 24863
Wild lending was required to keep the real estate Ponzi scheme running. The manipulators at the top made far more money than the house flippers on the bottom. The big guys are still making money off the fraud.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-08-2010, 11:12 AM
 
16,545 posts, read 13,461,752 times
Reputation: 4243
There is a huge difference between deregulation and coerced lending practices. The housing crash was mainly due to the Dems and ACORN throwing a hissy fit that people with bad credit and no job can't own a mcmansion. Nice Liberal Policies that worked like a charm eh?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-08-2010, 11:14 AM
 
16,545 posts, read 13,461,752 times
Reputation: 4243
Quote:
Originally Posted by GregW View Post
Wild lending was required to keep the real estate Ponzi scheme running. The manipulators at the top made far more money than the house flippers on the bottom. The big guys are still making money off the fraud.
Wild lending was pushed forward by the Clinton Administration. ACORN and the Left threw hissy fits and walked into bank meetings with baseball bats and demanded them to loan the losers hundreds of thousands of dollars. Nice Liberal policy eh? Worked out well didn't it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-08-2010, 11:16 AM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
20,054 posts, read 18,293,964 times
Reputation: 3826
OP officially owned. Close it up boys.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:01 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top