Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-12-2010, 11:03 AM
 
301 posts, read 403,656 times
Reputation: 133

Advertisements

It seems to me that since the 'I dabbled in witchcraft' and the MTV anti-masturbation campaign have gotten more attention, people have started to move away from the TEA party, nervous of it's intentions and ideals. Could this be true or has the Tea only gotten stronger? (Ha!)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-12-2010, 11:05 AM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,940,832 times
Reputation: 7118
Oh yeah, I'm sure that's what's happening out there as the GOP expands the political battlefield and once "safe" dem seats come into play.

Yeah sure.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2010, 11:08 AM
 
Location: Reality
9,949 posts, read 8,851,320 times
Reputation: 3315
Quote:
Originally Posted by TruthBeautyGoodness View Post
It seems to me that since the 'I dabbled in witchcraft' and the MTV anti-masturbation campaign have gotten more attention, people have started to move away from the TEA party, nervous of it's intentions and ideals. Could this be true or has the Tea only gotten stronger? (Ha!)
Sounds like a lot of wishful and delusional thinking to me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2010, 11:17 AM
 
301 posts, read 403,656 times
Reputation: 133
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
Oh yeah, I'm sure that's what's happening out there as the GOP expands the political battlefield and once "safe" dem seats come into play.

Yeah sure.
Is the GOP the same exact thing as the TEA party then? Hahaha, the truth finally comes out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2010, 11:19 AM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,940,832 times
Reputation: 7118
Quote:
Originally Posted by TruthBeautyGoodness View Post
Is the GOP the same as TEA party then? Hahaha, the truth finally comes out.
Is O'Donnell the only Tea Party member?

I guess the $14 million raised by Angle, a TP member, doesn't count.

Epic fail...and so early too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2010, 11:23 AM
 
10,092 posts, read 8,204,237 times
Reputation: 3411
Actually, the latest polling data put out by Charlie Cook shows the republicans picking up at least 40 seats (they were predicting 80). They only need 39 to take control of the House.

In the Senate, Cook thinks they'll pick up 7-9 seats, bringing the numbers close to 50/50. The truth is, that leaves both the house and Senate pretty much equally divided by party, and within one or two votes of each other.

Do you think that's a mandate?

The Cook Political Report | The insider's choice for election analysis
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2010, 11:23 AM
 
25,021 posts, read 27,930,716 times
Reputation: 11790
Quote:
Originally Posted by TruthBeautyGoodness View Post
Is the GOP the same exact thing as the TEA party then? Hahaha, the truth finally comes out.
No it's not. Not at all. The Tea Parties are a genuine movement that represents the average voter, while the GOP (the establishment. The Boehners, Roves, and McConnells of the world) just uses religion to get the vote out, and then never act on their promises because they want to be able to keep their ammunition in stock for the next elections. If they solve the cultural issues of the U.S., then they won't have much to play on, and will ACTUALLY have to rule our way, not the corporation's way. The same goes to the Democrats
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2010, 11:28 AM
 
25,021 posts, read 27,930,716 times
Reputation: 11790
Quote:
Originally Posted by mb1547 View Post
Actually, the latest polling data put out by Charlie Cook shows the republicans picking up at least 40 seats (they were predicting 80). They only need 39 to take control of the House.

In the Senate, Cook thinks they'll pick up 7-9 seats, bringing the numbers close to 50/50. The truth is, that leaves both the house and Senate pretty much equally divided by party, and within one or two votes of each other.

Do you think that's a mandate?

The Cook Political Report | The insider's choice for election analysis
RCP right now is predicting a 50/50 Senate and an average GOP gain of 51 seats in the House with the range being as little as 32 to as much as 71 seats
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2010, 11:28 AM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,940,832 times
Reputation: 7118
Quote:
Originally Posted by mb1547 View Post
Actually, the latest polling data put out by Charlie Cook shows the republicans picking up at least 40 seats (they were predicting 80). They only need 39 to take control of the House.

In the Senate, Cook thinks they'll pick up 7-9 seats, bringing the numbers close to 50/50. The truth is, that leaves both the house and Senate pretty much equally divided by party, and within one or two votes of each other.

Do you think that's a mandate?

The Cook Political Report | The insider's choice for election analysis
Have you looked at the OTHER political analysts, Like 538, RCP, Rothenburg? Funny you choose the one that has the least number of turnovers.......but not surprising.

Besides, not all GOP candidates running for election are TP members.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2010, 11:38 AM
 
10,092 posts, read 8,204,237 times
Reputation: 3411
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
Have you looked at the OTHER political analysts, Like 538, RCP, Rothenburg? Funny you choose the one that has the least number of turnovers.......but not surprising.

Besides, not all GOP candidates running for election are TP members.
You might actually get people who disagree with you to listen to what you say, if you just weren't so rude. It isn't an attractive quality--if you believe that your points are rational and logical, then you shouldn't have to insult people who might disagree with you. No need to be nasty.

If you don't like my choice of polling--just ignore it. The original predictions were (by many pollsters) that the R's would pick up more seats than they're proposing now. Do you think those numbers might go down because of more public attention to some of the more "colorful" tea party candidates, and IF the makeup of the House and Senate wind up being fairly evenly split, do you think it's a mandate for the R's?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:50 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top