Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-14-2010, 07:20 AM
 
Location: SARASOTA, FLORIDA
11,486 posts, read 15,304,477 times
Reputation: 4894

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by HC475 View Post
Nice try tossing in the children issue?... that's one of the main sticking points... If that part has already been implemented... How could they not have read it?...

Nancy Pelosi and many dems have said they have NOT READ THE bill but yet voted for it.

You and I both know they did not read the bill and did not take the time to fine tune it.

All they wanted is to pass something no matter what was in it so they can can say they did something and stand up and cheer it like they did.

They have had total control of our congress for almost 4 years and this is the only thing they have done in all that time and it is not right, not constitutional and not good for Americans.

Sad day when liberals believe they did something good and it turns out to be the worst bill ever passed in our congress ever.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-14-2010, 07:23 AM
 
10,854 posts, read 9,299,972 times
Reputation: 3122
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ultralight View Post
So true the Bush tax cuts lead to an explosion of debt since the increase in revenus where by far to small in relation to the tax cuts.
And there you have it!

Bush 43 cut taxes while waging two wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and significantly increasing the size of the federal government. In the meantime the corporations were investing in emerging markets where profits made in those markets are NOT TAXED until the money is repatriated back to the United States. Now why would any company send money back to the United States to be TAXED when they can re-invest it into the FASTEST GROWING ECONOMIES IN THE WORLD?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-14-2010, 07:24 AM
 
5,346 posts, read 4,046,385 times
Reputation: 545
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sunny-Days90 View Post
Nancy Pelosi and many dems have said they have NOT READ THE bill but yet voted for it.

You and I both know they did not read the bill and did not take the time to fine tune it.

All they wanted is to pass something no matter what was in it so they can can say they did something and stand up and cheer it like they did.

They have had total control of our congress for almost 4 years and this is the only thing they have done in all that time and it is not right, not constitutional and not good for Americans.

Sad day when liberals believe they did something good and it turns out to be the worst bill ever passed in our congress ever.
Worst bill ever?... because multi-billion dollar Insurance companies might have one less thing to insure?...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-14-2010, 07:27 AM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,478,139 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by HC475 View Post
Worst bill ever?... because multi-billion dollar Insurance companies might have one less thing to insure?...
nope, because congress has MANDATED that now you will HAVE to BUY that insurance or pay a fine..whether you can afford it on not
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-14-2010, 07:27 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,096,009 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by HC475 View Post
If your rates went up it's because your Insurance Company is gouging you before they have to compete with other Health Insurance plans... Proof that they are preparing for the inevitable...
The Bill hasn't even fully been implemented yet... so why raise your rates now?... because they can't drop children with pre-existing conditions?... Do tell...
The fact that the bill hasnt been fully implemented, doesnt mean that PARTS of it hasnt been enacted.. Even the CBO projected higher costs for insurance companies because of the healthcare bill. Why are you arguing with some anonymous poster claiming that they are being gouged? Shouldnt you be calling the CBO and Obama to tell them that their estimates of costs going up was wrong? You clearly have a higher intelligence level than the CBO and those who do this stuff for a living (cough).. so why dont you try to call those who do the estimates to tell them they are wrong.. Maybe because they were right.. costs are going UP because of the bill.. Stop denying the FACTS of this because even OBAMA said they would go up..
Quote:
Originally Posted by HC475 View Post
Stop which spending?... War spending?... How did Bush pay down debt?...
Spending has climbed 21% over the past 2 years, EXCLUDING the bailouts, and stimulus spending. Are you really telling me all of this spending is needed to "maintain" government? Sorry bub but clearly we have a SPENDING problem in Washington thanks to Democrats..
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ultralight View Post
The level of debt more than doubled under Bush upp from 5.7 to 11.4 trillion.
CONGRESS spends.. not Presidents.. but doubling the debt is something which has taken place during NUMEROUS presidents.. Democrats will triple the debt since they took over Congress in 2007.. Well done!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by HC475 View Post
Nice try tossing in the children issue?... that's one of the main sticking points
Its no sticking point.. its already passed
Quote:
Originally Posted by HC475 View Post
If that part has already been implemented
it doesnt need to have been implemented to raise costs (even though it has been implemented).. You wouldnt understand even if I tried to explain it to you.
Quote:
Originally Posted by HC475 View Post
How could they not have read it?...
Where have you been? There were HUGE debates because the bill was being signed and no one read the bill. The bill wasnt released until HOURS before the bill was signed into law.. NO ONE could possibly have read the bill and understood the ramifications of a bill dealing with 1/6th of the national economy in just a few hours... Listening to your postings trying to educate people on "facts" when you dont even know basic information like this has me really wondering.. Again.. how old are you?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-14-2010, 07:27 AM
 
Location: SARASOTA, FLORIDA
11,486 posts, read 15,304,477 times
Reputation: 4894
Quote:
Originally Posted by HC475 View Post
Worst bill ever?... because multi-billion dollar Insurance companies might have one less thing to insure?...

So you are saying that this bill is only to go after those big bad insurance companies? Are you really saying that?

Why not do it right if you are going to fix something instead of passing a bill that makes things worse instead of better?

Why pass a bill that the majority of Americans want repealed?

I know, Nancy and Harry promised if they were elected to the majority they would go after those big bad corporations, take down all those bad insurance companies and go after those bad oil companies for making that awful 2% profit margin.

So it is all about going after corporations and nothing to do with fixing a problem, you said it yourself.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-14-2010, 07:28 AM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,478,139 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by HC475 View Post
Worst bill ever?... because multi-billion dollar Insurance companies might have one less thing to insure?...
people with -"pre existing" dont need insurance (especially since insurance is just that the GAMBLE that you WONT get sick)..they need health CARE...but the dumbocrats just want you to BUY insurnace or be taxed (fined) on it
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-14-2010, 07:31 AM
 
5,346 posts, read 4,046,385 times
Reputation: 545
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sunny-Days90 View Post
So you are saying that this bill is only to go after those big bad insurance companies? Are you really saying that?

Why not do it right if you are going to fix something instead of passing a bill that makes things worse instead of better?

Why pass a bill that the majority of Americans want repealed?

I know, Nancy and Harry promised if they were elected to the majority they would go after those big bad corporations, take down all those bad insurance companies and go after those bad oil companies for making that awful 2% profit margin.

So it is all about going after corporations and nothing to do with fixing a problem, you said it yourself.
It's not about going after the big bad insurance companies... that's how THEY perceive it... It's about having National Health Care... like the other 36 industrialized countries who are ahead of the U.S....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-14-2010, 07:34 AM
 
10,854 posts, read 9,299,972 times
Reputation: 3122
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009 View Post
Amazing.

Tax cuts do not cause debt. One cannot have debt if one does not own the money in the first place.

Spending causes debt. It is mind boggling that liberals do not seem to understand that the property and incomes of the American people is not owned by the government in the first place.

Want to cut debt? Stop spending. Increasing taxes does nothing, as the feds will just blow more money, as they always do. Look at even the fake Clinton "surplus". They were falling all over themselves looking to "spend" the "surplus", rather than the unimaginable- paying down the debt.
If you don't grow revenue fast eniough and you increase expenses then you create debt. That's EXACTLY what happen under the Adminstration of Bush 43.

In the year 2000 federal tax revunes where $2.025 trillion dollars, federal outlays were $1.789 trillion dollars.

In 2008 federal tax revenues were $2.534 trillion dollars, federal outlays were $2.982 trillion dollars.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-14-2010, 07:37 AM
 
5,346 posts, read 4,046,385 times
Reputation: 545
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
The fact that the bill hasnt been fully implemented, doesnt mean that PARTS of it hasnt been enacted.. Even the CBO projected higher costs for insurance companies because of the healthcare bill. Why are you arguing with some anonymous poster claiming that they are being gouged? Shouldnt you be calling the CBO and Obama to tell them that their estimates of costs going up was wrong? You clearly have a higher intelligence level than the CBO and those who do this stuff for a living (cough).. so why dont you try to call those who do the estimates to tell them they are wrong.. Maybe because they were right.. costs are going UP because of the bill.. Stop denying the FACTS of this because even OBAMA said they would go up..

Spending has climbed 21% over the past 2 years, EXCLUDING the bailouts, and stimulus spending. Are you really telling me all of this spending is needed to "maintain" government? Sorry bub but clearly we have a SPENDING problem in Washington thanks to Democrats..

CONGRESS spends.. not Presidents.. but doubling the debt is something which has taken place during NUMEROUS presidents.. Democrats will triple the debt since they took over Congress in 2007.. Well done!!

Its no sticking point.. its already passed

it doesnt need to have been implemented to raise costs (even though it has been implemented).. You wouldnt understand even if I tried to explain it to you.

Where have you been? There were HUGE debates because the bill was being signed and no one read the bill. The bill wasnt released until HOURS before the bill was signed into law.. NO ONE could possibly have read the bill and understood the ramifications of a bill dealing with 1/6th of the national economy in just a few hours... Listening to your postings trying to educate people on "facts" when you dont even know basic information like this has me really wondering.. Again.. how old are you?
The spending over the past 2 years has been stimulus spending... not War spending under Bush... a fact you always seem to ignore...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:05 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top