Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-24-2010, 11:26 AM
 
Location: Wisconsin
37,959 posts, read 22,134,270 times
Reputation: 13794

Advertisements

If you will recall this feisty exchange:

Brig. Gen. Michael Walsh, with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, was testifying on the Louisiana coastal restoration process in the wake of Hurricane Katrina. He began to answer one of Boxer's questions with "ma'am" when Boxer immediately cut him off.

"You know, do me a favor," an irritated Boxer said. "Could say 'senator' instead of 'ma'am?'"

"Yes, ma'am," Walsh interjected.

"It's just a thing, I worked so hard to get that title, so I'd appreciate it, yes, thank you," she said.

"Yes, senator," he responded.

David Zucker, a long time liberal democrat has gone over to the dark side, another casualty of the 0bama era. Zucker has released a very funny spoof on the above incident:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ixiYZ...layer_embedded
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-24-2010, 11:40 AM
 
Location: Wisconsin
37,959 posts, read 22,134,270 times
Reputation: 13794
Here is a web site where Zucker explains his reasoning for making this spoof:

Big Hollywood » Blog Archive » ‘Call Me Senator’: Let This Video Be My Apology for Once Supporting Sen. Boxer

Zucker: I remember immediately feeling embarrassed that a member of Congress would treat an officer of the U.S. military like that. And doubly embarrassed that back in the early 90’s I had contributed to Barbara Boxer’s campaign. I was so outraged at the pure arrogance of that moment, that I sat down to write the spot, highlighting the pure absurdity of our California Senator dressing down a Brigadier General for calling her “Ma’am.”
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2010, 11:46 AM
 
Location: California
11,466 posts, read 19,345,447 times
Reputation: 12713
Thats just good right there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2010, 12:16 PM
 
Location: West Coast
82 posts, read 329,778 times
Reputation: 62
Glad you posted this.

Its an attitude that needs to be exposed.

If she had any decent manners, she would have talked to the General on the side to avoid embarrassment.

That's the way to handle protocol. If its no crisis, just step aside with someone afterward and get things squared away. The open fashion in which she did it exemplifies her arrogance and attitude.

I'd even consider that it implies a certain degree of disdain toward our military folks in general.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2010, 12:22 PM
 
Location: texas
3,135 posts, read 3,779,241 times
Reputation: 1814
Great Thread! Cannot stand that woman....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2010, 12:35 PM
 
Location: Texas
14,076 posts, read 20,521,713 times
Reputation: 7807
Did Boxer refer to him as "General Walsh," or just "Mr. Walsh?"

Senator, like General, is an earned title and if one deserves respect, so does the other.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2010, 12:40 PM
 
Location: Wisconsin
37,959 posts, read 22,134,270 times
Reputation: 13794
Quote:
Originally Posted by Obi_Wan_Kenobi View Post
Glad you posted this.

Its an attitude that needs to be exposed.

If she had any decent manners, she would have talked to the General on the side to avoid embarrassment.

That's the way to handle protocol. If its no crisis, just step aside with someone afterward and get things squared away. The open fashion in which she did it exemplifies her arrogance and attitude.

I'd even consider that it implies a certain degree of disdain toward our military folks in general.

As was pointed out in the video, its just a common courtesy for military members to address men as "sir" and women as "ma’am".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2010, 12:51 PM
 
25,021 posts, read 27,919,738 times
Reputation: 11790
Quote:
Originally Posted by stillkit View Post
Did Boxer refer to him as "General Walsh," or just "Mr. Walsh?"

Senator, like General, is an earned title and if one deserves respect, so does the other.
That's different. In the military all underlings call their superiors sir or ma'am. The only people that the military formally refer to their superiors by anything other than sir or ma'am are the president and vice president and even then they throw sir in there
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2010, 02:48 PM
 
Location: South Bay Native
16,225 posts, read 27,415,942 times
Reputation: 31495
Loved the clip - spot on. Fiorina is practically a shoo-in despite all her shortcomings (including that constant expression of constipation she has on her face) because of Boxer's unprecedented arrogance.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2010, 05:00 PM
 
Location: Wisconsin
37,959 posts, read 22,134,270 times
Reputation: 13794
Quote:
Originally Posted by theunbrainwashed View Post
That's different. In the military all underlings call their superiors sir or ma'am. The only people that the military formally refer to their superiors by anything other than sir or ma'am are the president and vice president and even then they throw sir in there
Not true, when addressing a general grade officer it is customary to use "General" instead of "Sir." At least this is the case in the Marine Corps, not sure about the other services though. In the Air Force I'm sure "dude" works for most all occasions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top