Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-29-2010, 11:07 AM
 
Location: Jonquil City (aka Smyrna) Georgia- by Atlanta
16,259 posts, read 24,761,129 times
Reputation: 3587

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
But that wealth is not necessarily in cash.
RE, business, plenty of wealth in asset building.

The poor can't achieve that. Designer sneakers do not appreciate in value over the years but an apartment building does.

Some people worked hard to build their wealth over the years.
And you look down on them for working hard ?
You fight for those on the bottom..some of which are quite happy to stay at the bottom ?

Fight for things like school vouchers, college scholarships, etc.
THAT will do more to give a chance for the next generation of poor to get themselves out of poverty. Funding more food stamps and school meals will NOT do it.

You cannot erase poverty by wealth distribution. But you can give those that are willing to work hard some help in getting out of poverty.
You gotta be kidding me. Worked hard?? How hard is it to flip houses and condos or sell worthless paper to each other?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-29-2010, 11:10 AM
 
Location: Jonquil City (aka Smyrna) Georgia- by Atlanta
16,259 posts, read 24,761,129 times
Reputation: 3587
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
The poor were given a chance to own their own homes.
Did they go after that $75-$100K starter home ?
No..they went after $500K McMansions and then couldn't afford the mortgage payments.

What does that tell you ? (rhetorical here..I'm not looking for answers but just to make you think).
If you can find a "starter" home for $75 or $100K, please tell me where it is. Maybe now you can but in the 90s, a $500K home WAS a starter home.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2010, 11:15 AM
 
783 posts, read 815,005 times
Reputation: 243
The rich have enough of money allready they dont need more through regressive taxes it is the largest broadest and wealthiest and most productive segment of society namely middle class that deserves keep it money the most.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2010, 11:15 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,472,986 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by KevK View Post
You gotta be kidding me. Worked hard?? How hard is it to flip houses and condos or sell worthless paper to each other?
Do you think that's the way everyone got their wealth ?
That could very well be a minority of middle income folks who found a fast path. Usually these types spend it as quick as they get it and are back to square one.

I worked with a guy who did not understand the stock market.
So, over 25 years accumulated 6-8 small apartment buildings all with cash; all in the upper lower, lower middle living areas where renting is not frowned upon yet respect where they live. By the time he retired he was able to hire a handyman to work at all those buildings.

You'd never know to look at him that he had a passive income stream of 6 figures. He told me his story at his retirement party and I was in awe.
He lived below his means for 25 years and slowly accumulated wealth with the money he saved.

There are far more people like that then the flippers of 2004.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2010, 11:20 AM
 
783 posts, read 815,005 times
Reputation: 243
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbohm View Post
think again. check this out;

THE LUCKY RICH - Nealz Nuze on boortz.com

the study that boortz indicates shows that the rich work far more hours and have far less leisure time than the poor do.
It is the broadest largest and overall the most productive segment of society that deserves to keep its money the most and that segment is the middle class.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2010, 11:22 AM
 
783 posts, read 815,005 times
Reputation: 243
You dont have to work hard in order to be rich you just have to be lucky.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2010, 11:23 AM
 
35,016 posts, read 39,151,733 times
Reputation: 6195
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
The poor were given a chance to own their own homes.
Did they go after that $75-$100K starter home ?
No..they went after $500K McMansions and then couldn't afford the mortgage payments.

What does that tell you ? (rhetorical here..I'm not looking for answers but just to make you think).
I'm sure you're not looking for answers, answers would collapse your fantasy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2010, 11:25 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,472,986 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ultralight View Post
You dont have to work hard in order to be rich you just have to be lucky.
Luck is for Las Vegas. A sound investment strategy, good budget and persistence to not cave into current fads.

Slow and steady wins in the long run.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2010, 11:27 AM
 
35,016 posts, read 39,151,733 times
Reputation: 6195
Why are the rich panicking over a less-than-5% increase in their household take-home income ABOVE $250K?

Or with programs like Neal's are they just tweaking the ropes to make sure you all are still in line, you good little guard doggies?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2010, 11:35 AM
 
783 posts, read 815,005 times
Reputation: 243
The broad middle class is the most productive segment of society and largest demand driver and is therefore the segment of society that deserves the keep its money the most.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:32 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top