Why is this psychologist speaking of "Muslim culture", "Muslim inbreeding", etc?
"If a Muslim does not react aggressively when criticized he is seen as weak, not worth trusting and he thus loses social status immediately," Sennels wrote.
Would a Lebanese Christian or atheist not be culturally inclined to have responses similar to that of a Lebanese Muslim, in terms of personal honor?
Haven't other Western cultures required strong reactions to perceived insults of personal honor (e.g. Latin cultures, the American South), and were they also the result of "genetic damage"?
Is there one "Christian culture" that we can psychoanalyze?
Is Saudi culture the same as Pakistani culture, and Moroccan culture, and Indonesian culture, and Turkish culture, and Iranian culture, and Iraqi culture, to name a few?
The "Muslim genetic damage" wouldn't affect a non-Muslim from the same population of a given Muslim country?
Did the endogamy that supposedly produced this genetic damage only start about 1400 years ago, coinciding with the creation of Islam, and not exist prior to that?
Did all Muslim-majority populations in all Muslim-majority countries practice endogamy?
Why does a psychologist consider himself qualified on matters of cultural anthropology or genetics?
Finally, haven't we heard something like this before?
Scientific racism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia