Are you wing challenged? Lib v Con

[rogerbacon]

Added my comments within the quote

Originally Posted by jetgraphics

Which wing supports what?

1. Which wing supports securing your Creator endowed rights to life, liberty and property ownership?
   Conservatives. Liberals don't acknowledge a "Creator" as evidenced by Obama's ommision of it three times when quoting that part of the Declaration of Independance.
2. Which wing only will govern those who consent?
   I'd say neither.
3. Which wing wants government to compel you to "share your wealth"?
   Liberal. Obama, the poser-boy for liberalism said so (and they STILL voted for him)
4. Which wing imposes its rules upon you, without your consent?
   both, but this is more a matter of party than ideology.
5. Which wing honors your natural and personal liberties?
   Conservative.
6. Which wing replaces them with government granted civil and political liberties?
   Liberal. In the absence of a Creator the only place rights can come from must be government. Therefore, government gets to determine what those rights are.
7. Which wing believes "No one should suffer because they lack {fill in the blank}" should be prefaced with "No one should be compelled to labor for the benefit of another, so that..." because slavery is not an acceptable solution to the ills of mankind.
   Conservative, but they do a ****-poor job of enunciating it.

[jetgraphics]

Based on the election, did the Tea'd Partisans really win?
Do their candidates support:

1. securing our Creator endowed rights to life, liberty and property ownership?
2. governing only those who consent?
3. our natural and personal liberties?
4. the belief that "No one should suffer because they lack {fill in the blank}" must be prefaced with "No one should be compelled to labor for the benefit of another, so that..." because slavery is not an acceptable solution to the ills of mankind?

Or did the "new gang" merely change seat warmers, and still support :

1. government coercion to "share your wealth"?
2. government imposition of its rules upon you, without your consent?
3. government granted civil and political liberties, at the expense of natural and personal liberties?

My skepticism on any meaningful change is based on this fact:
U.S. Treasury - FAQs: Legal Tender Status of currency
"Federal Reserve notes are "backed" by all the goods and services in the economy."

"All the goods and services" YOU thought were yours - were really "appropriated" (stolen) by Congress and pledged to underwrite the worthless notes. (Borrowed, at usury, into existence, pursuant to Title 12 USC Sec. 411)

Pursuant to the Declaration of Independence, governments are instituted among men to (a) secure rights - endowed by YOUR CREATOR, and (b) govern those who CONSENT.

Your right to absolutely own private property (protected by the 5th amendment) was abolished when you signed up with Socialist InSecurity. Because, as the FED arrogantly states, the CONGRESS can tax away EVERYTHING from you to "back" their wastepaper notes.

So it would appear that until Americans extricate themselves from "voluntary" participation, it matters little who is in the legislature. And the incessant battle between the "wing flapping" partisans is but a distraction so that the sheeple shearing can go on without delay.