Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-06-2010, 04:08 PM
 
379 posts, read 211,510 times
Reputation: 60

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Backspace View Post
We get it, we get that you're for women's rights and feel that women should all be treated as equals to men and should be protected from sexual abuse in the workplace. You feel that women should be paid equally to men and women are capable of doing anything a man can do.... but when conservative women run for office you attack them like a pack of wild dogs and throw around sexist insults like it's no big deal. You see no problem with the media and other liberals attacking conservative or Tea Party women but if a person lays a finger on a Code Pink woman they should get the electric chair.
Get over yourself.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-06-2010, 04:21 PM
 
17,400 posts, read 11,972,033 times
Reputation: 16152
Quote:
Originally Posted by KevK View Post
I don't think you do get it. I really do not. We still have the Senate and the Presidency. If you want a fight, bring it on. That is all I can say. Until 2012, we still run the show.
How's that for cooperation. Remember that comment in 2012, when we run the show.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2010, 04:40 PM
 
Location: My little patch of Earth
6,193 posts, read 5,367,423 times
Reputation: 3059
Quote:
Originally Posted by KevK View Post
I don't think you do get it. I really do not. We still have the Senate and the Presidency. If you want a fight, bring it on. That is all I can say. Until 2012, we still run the show.
I wonder how many of the guys in your 'show' are gonna vote with Republicans in order to bolster their reelection chances in 2012?

Might be rather humorous if those carry over dems vote across party lines.

Maybe vote a veto proof thing or three.

Yeah, baby.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2010, 05:17 PM
 
Location: Reality
9,949 posts, read 8,850,595 times
Reputation: 3315
Quote:
Originally Posted by crbcrbrgv View Post
We get it. We get that you invented the term "anchor baby" yet refuse to acknowledge Michelle Malkin as one just because she is one of your heroes.
We get it, You clearly don't understand what "anchor baby" means but you would love to pin something like that on a conservative person like Michelle Malkin. We get it, we really do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2010, 05:26 PM
 
Location: #
9,598 posts, read 16,563,825 times
Reputation: 6324
Quote:
Originally Posted by Backspace View Post
We get it, You clearly don't understand what "anchor baby" means but you would love to pin something like that on a conservative person like Michelle Malkin. We get it, we really do.
An anchor baby is any child born in the United States to non U.S. citizens. Since her parents were here on work visas which have a renewal policy that is inherently conditional, she is by definition an anchor baby.

Not really too hard to get, if you ask me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2010, 07:54 PM
 
Location: Reality
9,949 posts, read 8,850,595 times
Reputation: 3315
Quote:
Originally Posted by crbcrbrgv View Post
An anchor baby is any child born in the United States to non U.S. citizens. Since her parents were here on work visas which have a renewal policy that is inherently conditional, she is by definition an anchor baby.

Not really too hard to get, if you ask me.
An anchor baby is a child born in the united states to illegal aliens who come here illegally for the sole purpose of having a child on US soil and taking advantage of the 14th amendment of the US Constitution. I's not children born to "non-citizens" as you claim. Her parents came here on legal work visas and followed the proper procedure to become legal US citizens which is exactly what conservatives like myself want. You claimed that conservatives made up the term anchor baby, it looks like you need to learn what it actually means instead of trying

Anchor baby - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2010, 08:02 PM
 
Location: #
9,598 posts, read 16,563,825 times
Reputation: 6324
FAIR says otherwise.

FAIR: Anchor Baby: Part of the Immigration-Related American Lexicon (http://www.fairus.org/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&id=16535&security=1601&news _iv_ctrl=1007 - broken link)

I suppose you win this debate. Wikipedia is never incorrect.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2010, 08:08 PM
 
Location: Reality
9,949 posts, read 8,850,595 times
Reputation: 3315
Quote:
Originally Posted by crbcrbrgv View Post
We get it. We get that you invented the term "anchor baby" yet refuse to acknowledge Michelle Malkin as one just because she is one of your heroes.
Quote:
Originally Posted by crbcrbrgv View Post
FAIR says otherwise.

FAIR: Anchor Baby: Part of the Immigration-Related American Lexicon (http://www.fairus.org/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&id=16535&security=1601&news _iv_ctrl=1007 - broken link)

I suppose you win this debate. Wikipedia is never incorrect.
We get it, you will believe anything you read on any liberal leaning pro-illegal website you find. We get that you don't have the ability to discern what is true fact and what is propaganda unless of course it's found at a Fox News web address then you're 100% sure it's propaganda before you even read it. If I, along with millions of other conservatives invented the term anchor baby I would think we would be a better resource for it's definition than some biased website.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2010, 11:38 PM
 
Location: #
9,598 posts, read 16,563,825 times
Reputation: 6324
Quote:
Originally Posted by Backspace View Post
We get it, you will believe anything you read on any liberal leaning pro-illegal website you find. We get that you don't have the ability to discern what is true fact and what is propaganda unless of course it's found at a Fox News web address then you're 100% sure it's propaganda before you even read it. If I, along with millions of other conservatives invented the term anchor baby I would think we would be a better resource for it's definition than some biased website.
You lose.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-07-2010, 12:17 AM
 
785 posts, read 619,191 times
Reputation: 243
Quote:
Originally Posted by crbcrbrgv View Post
You lose.
Actually, he won. He's been on point in this entire discussion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:18 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top