Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-10-2010, 02:50 AM
 
Location: Northridge/Porter Ranch, Calif.
24,511 posts, read 33,312,803 times
Reputation: 7623

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ultralight View Post
The rich are paying higher income taxes because they have higher incomes but other taxes like payroll tax property tax and sales tax and exicise tax are proportionally payed most by the middle class and the working class so in tottal the rich are paying less tax than the middle class and the working class.
During the Bush era, 86% of all federal income taxes were paid by the top 25% of income earners, up from 84% in 2000.

The top 50% paid 97% of all income taxes.

The top 1% of wager earners paid 37% of income taxes, up 2% from 2000.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-10-2010, 05:17 AM
 
3,175 posts, read 3,655,617 times
Reputation: 3747
Does anybody remember the clip of Clinton walking from the parking lot to his friends funeral?
He was laughing up a storm until he saw a camera on him, he then put his hand to his face and pretended he was wiping away tears!
Good old Clinton, so glad he is gone.
Can't remember if that was before or after he made the deal to send all of our jobs to China.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-10-2010, 07:04 AM
 
320 posts, read 290,417 times
Reputation: 137
Say what you will about his morals and personal life. But we were MUCH better off when he was in charge of our country. Bush with his simultaneous increased spending with tax cuts for the rich drove us into the toilet. But it's OK. We can blame it all on the black guy in office. Then again he hasn't done anything to pull us out of Bush's crapper.

No one has the backbone anymore to take on corporate America and bring this country back to where it was. And that's sad.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-10-2010, 07:04 AM
 
3,128 posts, read 6,534,516 times
Reputation: 1599
We need an I.Q minimum to start threads here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-10-2010, 01:12 PM
 
Location: Northridge/Porter Ranch, Calif.
24,511 posts, read 33,312,803 times
Reputation: 7623
Quote:
Originally Posted by Domination83 View Post
Say what you will about his morals and personal life. But we were MUCH better off when he was in charge of our country. Bush with his simultaneous increased spending with tax cuts for the rich drove us into the toilet. But it's OK. We can blame it all on the black guy in office. Then again he hasn't done anything to pull us out of Bush's crapper.

No one has the backbone anymore to take on corporate America and bring this country back to where it was. And that's sad.
Tax cuts and increased spending are two separate things. Tax cuts do not cause "increased" spending, nor do they cause a deficit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-10-2010, 01:56 PM
 
320 posts, read 290,417 times
Reputation: 137
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fleet View Post
Tax cuts and increased spending are two separate things. Tax cuts do not cause "increased" spending, nor do they cause a deficit.
Bush cut taxes right?

And then spent billions in Iraq right?

Lower taxes + increasing spending = Failure
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-10-2010, 03:37 PM
 
Location: Georgia, on the Florida line, right above Tallahassee
10,471 posts, read 15,833,234 times
Reputation: 6438
Oh, the huge manatee!

Oh the huge manatee | Know Your Meme
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-10-2010, 03:53 PM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
4,897 posts, read 8,318,422 times
Reputation: 1911
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metro Matt View Post
During a Martin Luther King speech?

That is the height of disrespect toward the very people he catered to.
It was a memorial speech since the man has been dead almost 40 years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-10-2010, 04:39 PM
 
Location: Northridge/Porter Ranch, Calif.
24,511 posts, read 33,312,803 times
Reputation: 7623
Quote:
Originally Posted by Domination83 View Post
Bush cut taxes right?

And then spent billions in Iraq right?

Lower taxes + increasing spending = Failure
I agree about Bush overspending. Not necessarily in Iraq but in social spending.

However, again, the two are not related. Lower taxes and spending are two different things.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-10-2010, 06:37 PM
 
Location: Upper East Side of Texas
12,498 posts, read 26,994,162 times
Reputation: 4890
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oerdin View Post
It was a memorial speech since the man has been dead almost 40 years.
No ****?

I didn't know that!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:52 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top