Ann Coulter:Repeal the 26th Amendment! (politician, leader, elect, government)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
She's pointing out the insanity of ObamaCare's policy of considering anyone under 26 as being a child and being covered on their parents' insurance policy. If they are 'children' for the purpose of insurance then why should they be allowed to vote? They're children, right? Well, if they are NOT children, why are they still covered on their parents' insurance policies as if they were children.
Some people's hatred of Ann blinds them to the way she used wit to make her point.
this isnt about the voting age it is about the insanity of Bammers healthcare bill.
Liberals either do not get satire or they refuse to get it so they can have something stupid to argue about.
Ahhh, Ferd, oldboy, how nice of you to defend Ann. Unfortunately, I just see her babbling as just that, babbling. Ann should know better than to try using satire. She should write a more straightforward "rant"......
Ahhh, Ferd, oldboy, how nice of you to defend Ann. Unfortunately, I just see her babbling as just that, babbling. Ann should know better than to try using satire. She should write a more straightforward "rant"......
defending Ann isnt the point.
pointing out the fact that the wackadoodle leftest evidently cannot read is.
Look at what we got when we had a record turnout of young people in 2008.....not saying it's right, but I can see how someone would want to raise the voting age to 30.
Should we take away anyones right to vote because one person does not agree with how they voted?
Once you start taking away people's right to vote, everyone loses freedom.
Look at any dictatorship first elected, and they did the same to protect "the people".
She says to take away people's right to vote because they didn't vote the way they liked, and that voting population gets smaller and smaller. To do so in the name of freedom takes some real balls.
People rant about this one party protecting people's rights and freedoms. Then people come out with this crap. Truly awe inspiring the cognitive dissidence to justify this kind of thinking. What is funny is when she starts ranting about anyone who doesn't agree with her as "drinking the Kool-Aid". Which proves the fact that...
Quote:
They don't seem to get that they, themselves, are far more in line with those who followed Jim Jones into eternity than are those who are based in reality and have better things to do than bother with extremism.
This is the first time I have seen Ann Coulter's name mentioned in months. I doubt the woman has enough gray matter to think anything through to a logical conclusion.
Should we take away anyones right to vote because one person does not agree with how they voted?
Once you start taking away people's right to vote, everyone loses freedom.
Look at any dictatorship first elected, and they did the same to protect "the people".
She says to take away people's right to vote because they didn't vote the way they liked, and that voting population gets smaller and smaller. To do so in the name of freedom takes some real balls.
People rant about this one party protecting people's rights and freedoms. Then people come out with this crap. Truly awe inspiring the cognitive dissidence to justify this kind of thinking. What is funny is when she starts ranting about anyone who doesn't agree with her as "drinking the Kool-Aid". Which proves the fact that...
I wasn't serious. Sorry if that didn't come across. But the point remains though...if we hadn't had the young voter turnout we might be better off.
She's pointing out the insanity of ObamaCare's policy of considering anyone under 26 as being a child and being covered on their parents' insurance policy. If they are 'children' for the purpose of insurance then why should they be allowed to vote? They're children, right? Well, if they are NOT children, why are they still covered on their parents' insurance policies as if they were children.
Some people's hatred of Ann blinds them to the way she used wit to make her point.
Parents should be the ones who are able to make the decision on whether or not to cover their children under their policy and that is exactly what the healthcare plan allows. Should we ban college kids from voting as well since most of them are covered under their parents insurance? I'm sure Ann would like to ban that as well.
I think we should probably either pass a law requiring Ann Coulter to wear a turtleneck so we're not forced to view her Adam's Apple, or else, a law stating that all women with Adam's Apples be stripped of their citizenship and right to vote. Then again, she doesn't really know where to vote, as we've seen in the past.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
