Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-21-2013, 01:08 PM
 
33,016 posts, read 27,458,643 times
Reputation: 9074

Advertisements

[quote=petch751;29228153]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Evenstar51 View Post
What an excellent post! The last paragraph quoted is so disturbing. And the distribution of wealth is truly obscene:



Top 1 percent
Income: $1,318,200

Net Worth: $16,439,400

hmmm, but Obama went after people making $200k a year. That is $1,118,200 less than the articles states is the top 1%

So when Obama calls people at $200k a year, the rich, the 1%, he is lying. Imagine that lol

Source? The numbers i've seen suggest that the top 1 percent of tax filers are closer to $200K.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-09-2015, 10:35 PM
 
Location: South Carolina
3,022 posts, read 2,274,221 times
Reputation: 2168
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
Yup..because when labor costs go up cuts have to be made to maintain revenue. You cannot change one side of the equation and expect the same answer.

(rounded for easier math)
20 people at $5/hour = $100
20 people at $7/hour = $140

Where does that extra $40 come from in labor costs ? Does the company just "eat it" or make cuts in other places.

This is what happens to contain costs:

14 people at $7/hour = $98
So 14 people are better off than they were..but 6 are now SOL with no income.
So people who get paid more don't spend that money at businesses they just save all that money. You are looking at it from the cost side not where the money goes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-10-2015, 08:45 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,006 posts, read 44,824,472 times
Reputation: 13709
Quote:
Originally Posted by Storm Eagle View Post
So people who get paid more don't spend that money at businesses they just save all that money.
Save? Don't you mean invest? That money is invested in companies that provide millions of jobs for others, or in municipal bonds that provide the capital for cities, towns, counties, park districts, school districts, etc., to complete capital improvement projects for which they otherwise wouldn't have adequate funding.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-14-2015, 10:05 AM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,948,900 times
Reputation: 5661
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
Yup..because when labor costs go up cuts have to be made to maintain revenue. You cannot change one side of the equation and expect the same answer.

(rounded for easier math)
20 people at $5/hour = $100
20 people at $7/hour = $140

Where does that extra $40 come from in labor costs ? Does the company just "eat it" or make cuts in other places.

This is what happens to contain costs:

14 people at $7/hour = $98
So 14 people are better off than they were..but 6 are now SOL with no income.
If a business didn't need those workers, they would have fired them already. The question is, are those workers producing enough to make it still worth having them employed? The answer is usually, yes.

Where does that extra $40 come from? Either a small hit on profits, a small increase in prices or through productivity. Happier employees work better. This is productivity over time compared to wages.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-14-2015, 11:49 AM
 
34,278 posts, read 19,371,187 times
Reputation: 17261
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech View Post
If a business didn't need those workers, they would have fired them already. The question is, are those workers producing enough to make it still worth having them employed? The answer is usually, yes.

Where does that extra $40 come from? Either a small hit on profits, a small increase in prices or through productivity. Happier employees work better. This is productivity over time compared to wages.
Want a even more depressing chart? Get the chart thats from before 1970 where wages and productivity followed each other much more closely.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:35 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top