News Video, Geraldo Rivera On 911 Truthers - "The Most Obnoxious Protesters In Recent Years Are Right!! (Afghanistan, how much)

[workingclasshero]

Originally Posted by pollyrobin

NIST and the World Trade Center

"NTS could not verify the actual (or as built) construction,
the properties and condition of the materials used." That
includes the steel.

Why wouldn't they want to test the steel from Tower 7?
That seems odd.

"Although no steel was recovered from WTC 7, a 47-story building that also collapsed on September 11, properties for steel used in its construction were estimated based on literature and contemporaneous documents."

polly I was talking about the towers built in the late 60's and early 70's...not building 7 build in the early 80's

there is a big difference there

[workingclasshero]

Originally Posted by Visvaldis

Just amazing! The hijacker's passport survived the fireball impact! Flew out of his pocket! And fluttered to the ground! Absolutely believable!

see post 101

answered already for you

//www.city-data.com/forum/16692805-post101.html


to Retired Marine , thank you, from a Retired Army First Sergeant

[HistorianDude]

Originally Posted by Visvaldis

Just amazing! The hijacker's passport survived the fireball impact! Flew out of his pocket! And fluttered to the ground! Absolutely believable!

Welcome to the law of incredibly large numbers. Something had to survive. That was one of the things that did.

[HistorianDude]

Originally Posted by workingclasshero

Why is it when we talk about bld7, people never:

1. Admit that... <snip>

Because it is harder to understand the truth than it is to just make stuff up.

[ergohead]

Originally Posted by HistorianDude

Welcome to the law of incredibly large numbers. Something had to survive. That was one of the things that did.

"Some circumstantial evidence is very strong, as when you find a trout in the milk." Hank D. Thoreau

[HistorianDude]

Originally Posted by HC475

LOL... I stand corrected...

WTC 2 collapsed at 9:59 AM

WTC 1 collapsed at 10:28 AM

Looks like a controlled and timed demolition to me... The level of denial on this board astounds me... Really...

You "stand corrected," but your conclusion remains unchanged.

QED... you do not care what the evidence says one way or the other. You're sticking with your delusion.

[HistorianDude]

Originally Posted by pollyrobin

There is no reason that the WTC should have totally collapsed because a plane hit it.

It didn't. Both towers survived the plane impacts.

They did not, however, survive the subsequent fires.

[HistorianDude]

Originally Posted by las vegas drunk

Would someone please explain to me?

EXCLUSIVE: Al Qaeda Leader Dined at the Pentagon Just Months After 9/11 - FoxNews.com

What's to explain? The article seems very straightforward.

Let us know what you;re confused about and we'll take a shot at helping you with it.

[ergohead]

Originally Posted by HistorianDude

It didn't. Both towers survived the plane impacts.

They did not, however, survive the subsequent fires.

They didn't survive the plan.

Bush is still smirking about this.

[HistorianDude]

Originally Posted by HC475

Thanks for the correction... still almost exactly 30 minutes apart...

= Controlled Demolition...

I know I'm going to regret asking this question, but what the hell?

What possible reason would somebody have for blowing up these buildings "almost exactly 30 minutes apart?"