Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-17-2010, 02:40 PM
 
5,346 posts, read 4,048,030 times
Reputation: 545

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Retired Marine 1967 View Post
have you ever even been to New york before

do you understand building 7 was built ontop of a ConEdison power plant
I was living in Queens, NY at the time... In fact... My Verizon DSL I was using at the time went out later that night as a result of WTC 7...

You still haven't answered why the two buildings on either side didn't come down...

Answer... They weren't part of the WTC buildings 1-7 demolition job...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-17-2010, 02:42 PM
 
277 posts, read 228,849 times
Reputation: 71
Quote:
Originally Posted by HC475 View Post
Sure it was convenient... for the ones who planned the demolition... What I believe is... I believe I see both buildings on either side of WTC 7 with virtually no damage at all... By looking at the actual photograph... It's called evidence...
you understand the tallest demo is 29 stories...right???

you understand that to demo a building you need to GUT IT, take walls down, expose beams to be cut 3/4 through, to have wires everywhere

you understand the towers and building 7 were OFFICE BUILDINGS that housed thousdands of employees

you do understand if it could be done to wire those building would take at least a team of 100 men working 12 hour shifts at least 12 moths to get the job done



it was not a demo
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2010, 02:44 PM
 
19,226 posts, read 15,324,078 times
Reputation: 2337
Quote:
Originally Posted by Retired Marine 1967 View Post
what garbage,

the tonkin incident was 1964, we were in nam since 1957
What I think jetgraphics means by "into", is, "into".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2010, 02:45 PM
 
5,346 posts, read 4,048,030 times
Reputation: 545
Quote:
Originally Posted by Retired Marine 1967 View Post
you understand the tallest demo is 29 stories...right???

you understand that to demo a building you need to GUT IT, take walls down, expose beams to be cut 3/4 through, to have wires everywhere

you understand the towers and building 7 were OFFICE BUILDINGS that housed thousdands of employees

you do understand if it could be done to wire those building would take at least a team of 100 men working 12 hour shifts at least 12 moths to get the job done



it was not a demo
The buildings came down at freefall speed... gravity alone cannot do that...

It was a demo...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2010, 02:45 PM
 
277 posts, read 228,849 times
Reputation: 71
Quote:
Originally Posted by HC475 View Post
I was living in Queens, NY at the time... In fact... My Verizon DSL I was using at the time went out later that night as a result of WTC 7...

You still haven't answered why the two buildings on either side didn't come down...

Answer... They weren't part of the WTC buildings 1-7 demolition job...
because those two were not built on top of a ConEd power plant,

http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/images/WTC7Columns_Framing_3x4Poster_HR.jpg (broken link)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2010, 02:47 PM
 
277 posts, read 228,849 times
Reputation: 71
Quote:
Originally Posted by HC475 View Post
The buildings came down at freefall speed... gravity alone cannot do that...

It was a demo...
what do you think gravity does

do you think they would come down in slo-mo???

the siesmic evidence says it took over 19 seconds, the penthouse fell first

in a demo the top doesnt fall first


please think
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2010, 02:50 PM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,892 posts, read 16,080,363 times
Reputation: 3954
Quote:
Originally Posted by HC475 View Post
The buildings came down at freefall speed... gravity alone cannot do that...
Then it's a good thing that gravity alone did not do that. A progressive failure that can be easily seen in the video did that.

Quote:
Originally Posted by HC475
It was a demo...
Wrong yet again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2010, 02:53 PM
 
5,346 posts, read 4,048,030 times
Reputation: 545
Quote:
Originally Posted by Retired Marine 1967 View Post
because those two were not built on top of a ConEd power plant,
So WTC buildings 3-6 were also built on top of a ConEd plant?... First it was fires burning in the basement of WTC 7... Now it's ConEd's fault... So why didn't the two buildings on either side of WTC 7 come down as a result but WTC buildings 3-6 did come down?... Notice how WTC buildings 4-5 didn't totally collapse but WTC 7 did...

This was a textbook controlled demolition...

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2010, 02:53 PM
 
Location: Blankity-blank!
11,446 posts, read 16,188,106 times
Reputation: 6963
9-11 was certainly a day of amazing coincidences with many unusual things happening, some as if guided by supernatural powers.
Many questions but so few explanations.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2010, 02:57 PM
 
277 posts, read 228,849 times
Reputation: 71
Quote:
Originally Posted by HC475 View Post
This was a textbook controlled demolition...
i'd like to see your textbook, because it isnt like any demo I've ever seen or done
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:48 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top