Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-18-2010, 01:54 PM
 
13,186 posts, read 14,976,972 times
Reputation: 4555

Advertisements

The real reason the testimony was excluded was the fact that Bush tortured prisoners and hoped that the
"evidence" still would be used against them.

If anybody gets off it's because Bush broke the law.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-18-2010, 01:55 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,940,832 times
Reputation: 7118
Quote:
Originally Posted by MainelyJersey View Post
Oh, OK. I thought the topic was Terrorist Trials in Civilian Court.

So it seemed appropriate (to me) to mention the whole idea of mock trials; predetermined outcome; presidential indefinite detention. You know, that type of stuff.

Carry on with your discourse of the validity and well, American justice, of these trials.
It is appropriate, don't worry.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ovcatto View Post
I'm not missing anything, I'm just trying to stay on topic.
The dog and pony, show trial of obama/holder IS on topic. Do you deny they said this? Do you deny that is what they will do if any high value terrorist is acquitted in civilian court?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ovcatto View Post
Sanrene seems to think that Obama was the jury forman or something.
His policy of trying terrorists in civilian courts, giving them ALL the rights of an American citizen.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TigerLily24 View Post
Salon? Please......

Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
Do you have proof that Ghailani was guilty of any of the other charges lodged against him?
Oh....only his confession and the mountain of evidence against him, including the man who could NOT testify about the truck and explosives. The witness was named BY the defendant.

Wouldn't you know, defending a terrorist that murdered 200+ people....I guess you can claim the guy is lying..right?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2010, 02:02 PM
 
31,387 posts, read 37,045,063 times
Reputation: 15038
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quick Enough View Post
A lot of the evidence was not allowed. In a Military trial it would have been.
Again, based upon the conviction rate and severity of judgments found by the military tribunals, what do you have to base this argument on?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2010, 02:18 PM
 
Location: Home, Home on the Front Range
25,826 posts, read 20,700,795 times
Reputation: 14818
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
Salon? Please......
Your disliking the source doesn't make their presentation of the statute from the UCMJ or the judge's decision any less accurate.
But, you've ignored that reality in several posts already, no reason you would acknowledge it now.


Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
Oh....only his confession and the mountain of evidence against him, including the man who could NOT testify about the truck and explosives. The witness was named BY the defendant.

Wouldn't you know, defending a terrorist that murdered 200+ people....I guess you can claim the guy is lying..right?
Right. The confessions that were obtained through torture. Yes, very credible.
It is a true shame that even those who should be convicted may not ever get just punishment all because someone decided that his administration was above the law.

You won't like this link either, but, it says all that needs to be said about this travesty:

"By throwing aside all norms for prisoner treatment and setting up an apparatus of systemic torture, Bush and Cheney destroyed critical evidence that could have been used by the prosecution to convict."


The Ghailani Verdict And The Price Of Torture - The Daily Dish | By Andrew Sullivan

Oh, there was a miscarriage of justice alright, but it wasn't during this trial.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2010, 03:35 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
14,317 posts, read 22,383,703 times
Reputation: 18436
Default Another win for Obama; terrorist suspect prosecuted

This is another plus for the Obama administration. First, his efforts to help the near-extinct auto industry are working (GM), now this.

Ahmed Ghailani and the Justice Department's Communication Breakdown - Newsweek
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2010, 03:38 PM
 
13,186 posts, read 14,976,972 times
Reputation: 4555
This is just an awesome article on the trial and dismantling right wing myths about civilian trials.

Glenn Greenwald should be read everyday.

The Ghailani verdict and American justice - Glenn Greenwald - Salon.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2010, 03:42 PM
 
Location: Home, Home on the Front Range
25,826 posts, read 20,700,795 times
Reputation: 14818
Thanks OP - it is indeed a win for the administration regardless of how some would prefer to characterize it. The DoJ did the best they could with the evidence allowed and got a conviction. The family members got to see justice served. Another example of the strength of the American justice system. I hope they take Rep. Weiner's advice to heart:

" As outspoken Rep. Anthony Weiner of New York tweeted this morning, "New nominee for most inept messaging by the Obama team: DoJ. Guys, you won! Act like it!""
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2010, 03:48 PM
 
Location: 77441
3,160 posts, read 4,366,471 times
Reputation: 2314
wow
just.....
wow...

you guys are drunk on kool-aid...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2010, 03:57 PM
 
5,915 posts, read 4,812,531 times
Reputation: 1398
He was found guilty on a single conspiracy charge and cleared on 284 other counts. Is that really a successful prosecution?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2010, 04:02 PM
 
14,917 posts, read 13,099,924 times
Reputation: 4828
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kirdik View Post
He was found guilty on a single conspiracy charge and cleared on 284 other counts. Is that really a successful prosecution?
It was a very successful prosecution. It was a win for the security of the American people - it put the bad guy away for a very long time - and it was a win for American values - the Constitution wasn't shredded and stomped all over in the process.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:43 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top