Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-19-2010, 04:48 AM
 
Location: Tennessee
37,794 posts, read 40,990,020 times
Reputation: 62169

Advertisements

"The House passed the Telework Enhancement Act (H.R. 1722) on Thursday making way for expanded telework opportunities for federal employees. The Senate passed its version of the bill on Sept. 29, and the legislation now makes its way to President Obama and is expected to be signed into law. The bipartisan bill encourages feds to work from home. Currently about 5 percent of the federal workforce teleworks on some level and the goal is to increase that number. The House vote was 254-152, in the face of Republican opposition to the $28 million pricetag to implement the law over the next five years. "

Federal News Radio 1500 AM: Telework bill passes House, headed to Obama

I know. You who like the bill say $28 million is chump change but all the little chump change things they pass, add up. So, the lame duck Congress is still spending away with Pelosi at the helm and Obama is bs'ing on spending if he signs it.

These are the 14 Republicans that voted for it. Remember their names when they come up for re-election.

Bilbray
Buchanan
Cao
Capito
Dent
Djou
Forbes
Fortenberry
Jones
LaTourette
McCotter
Reichert
Wittman
Wolf

And these are the 16 Republicans that didn't bother to vote: Barrett (SC), Bilirakis, Boozman, Broun (GA), Brown (SC), Brown-Waite, Coble, Davis (KY), Duncan, Fallin, Gallegly, Kirk, Linder, Moran (KS), Radanovich, Westmoreland.

No House Democrat voted against it.

Last edited by LauraC; 11-19-2010 at 05:03 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-19-2010, 04:51 AM
 
Location: Londonderry, NH
41,479 posts, read 59,756,720 times
Reputation: 24863
The Government gets more work, the employees get more time at home without the commute and the gasoline compaanies sell less fuel. Sounds like a great deal over all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-19-2010, 05:32 AM
 
Location: My little patch of Earth
6,193 posts, read 5,366,177 times
Reputation: 3059
Quote:
Originally Posted by GregW View Post
The Government gets more work, the employees get more time at home without the commute and the gasoline compaanies sell less fuel. Sounds like a great deal over all.
It's called 'a green for all'.

Who knows, maybe they'll be able to surf porn sites easier at home.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-19-2010, 08:39 AM
 
Location: Central Maine
4,697 posts, read 6,445,432 times
Reputation: 5047
Quote:
Originally Posted by LauraC View Post
"The House passed the Telework Enhancement Act (H.R. 1722) on Thursday making way for expanded telework opportunities for federal employees. The Senate passed its version of the bill on Sept. 29, and the legislation now makes its way to President Obama and is expected to be signed into law. The bipartisan bill encourages feds to work from home. Currently about 5 percent of the federal workforce teleworks on some level and the goal is to increase that number. The House vote was 254-152, in the face of Republican opposition to the $28 million pricetag to implement the law over the next five years. "
I'm sure it's just coincidence that you stop quoting the story right before this:
"But bill sponsors say telework increases productivity and saves money. Supporters estimate telecommuting saved the government $30 million a day in the government shutdown during last winter's snowstorm."
That's $30 million a day based only on current numbers of federal employees eligible for and allowed to telework.

Quote:
Originally Posted by GregW View Post
The Government gets more work, the employees get more time at home without the commute and the gasoline companies sell less fuel. Sounds like a great deal over all.
Less traffic congestion, less air pollution, less dependence on foreign oil, and if the experience of my former federal agency is any indication, there's more work done (based on careful record-keeping) on a telework day than an at-work day, with phone calls, meetings, etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-19-2010, 09:31 AM
 
Location: Home, Home on the Front Range
25,826 posts, read 20,692,117 times
Reputation: 14818
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenGene View Post
I'm sure it's just coincidence that you stop quoting the story right before this:
"But bill sponsors say telework increases productivity and saves money. Supporters estimate telecommuting saved the government $30 million a day in the government shutdown during last winter's snowstorm."
That's $30 million a day based only on current numbers of federal employees eligible for and allowed to telework.


Less traffic congestion, less air pollution, less dependence on foreign oil, and if the experience of my former federal agency is any indication, there's more work done (based on careful record-keeping) on a telework day than an at-work day, with phone calls, meetings, etc.
Exactly. I am really not understanding the OP's position. This could potentially save more per day than the entire cost of the program. Where is the downside here?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-19-2010, 11:35 AM
 
Location: Earth
24,620 posts, read 28,271,474 times
Reputation: 11416
The OP said she worked for the feds under CSRS for 34 years.
Maybe there's some jealousy that she didn't get to work from home.

Telework saves on resources, including office space (sharing desk space), petrol used to get to work, computer resources (I used my personal PC when I teleworked) and I took fewer breaks, had fewer distractions, got more done and worked later.

What's the losing part of the equation?
I mean other than sour grapes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-19-2010, 01:24 PM
 
6,497 posts, read 11,810,585 times
Reputation: 11124
Aw hell... that's enough to make me quit my job and become a fed employee if I can.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-19-2010, 01:53 PM
 
13,005 posts, read 18,896,239 times
Reputation: 9251
Quote:
Originally Posted by steelstress View Post
Aw hell... that's enough to make me quit my job and become a fed employee if I can.
Do you really want that? Then you can't get out of the office by going home.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-20-2010, 07:03 AM
 
3,378 posts, read 3,705,679 times
Reputation: 710
There are pros & cons. I would agree with the bill if it had restrictions. For example...
1. teleworking should be used only during bad weather or other emergency type situations. In this case, it is better for people to work from home than risk life or limb to get to work.
2. teleworking for ALL gov't agencies all the time is a bad idea. there is way too much wiggle room for fraud, waste, & abuse. How would we really have any accountability? Too much teleworking is a recipe for disaster.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-20-2010, 08:43 AM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,694,120 times
Reputation: 35920
Ever been to DC and seen the traffic there, or actually driven in it? Horrible.

I'd not worry about the trite phrase "waste, fraud and abuse". Many studies have shown just the opposite.

DH once worked at an office an hour's drive from our house. He telecommuted one day a week so he could participate more in our children's activities, or make an appointment.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:20 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top